How many terms of the Maclaurin series for $ln(1+x)$ do you need to use to estimate $ln(1.4)$ to within $0.001$? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding the first 5 terms of a Maclaurin Series using division?Estimate error using Taylor SeriesStrategy to recognize and solve sequence and series problems?Use the Maclaurin series for $cos(x)$to compute the value of $cos(5^circ)$ correct to five decimal places.Number of terms to estimate the integral within the indicated accuracy using series!User remainder theorem to estimate $ sum^infty_k=1 frac12(-1)^k+1k^2 $ within $frac25$How do you find nth maclaurin/taylor series or polynomial?Solving an integral using first two terms of the Mclaurin series for $f(x)$Show $log(1-x)=-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nn,forall xin(-1,1)$.Calculating the approximation of an integral using the first four terms of a Maclaurin series.

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Generate an RGB colour grid

Time to Settle Down!

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?

Sum letters are not two different

How to tell that you are a giant?

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

How to write the following sign?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

What order were files/directories outputted in dir?

I am having problem understanding the behavior of below code in JavaScript

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Trademark violation for app?

What is "gratricide"?

Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?

Morning, Afternoon, Night Kanji

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

What initially awakened the Balrog?



How many terms of the Maclaurin series for $ln(1+x)$ do you need to use to estimate $ln(1.4)$ to within $0.001$?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Finding the first 5 terms of a Maclaurin Series using division?Estimate error using Taylor SeriesStrategy to recognize and solve sequence and series problems?Use the Maclaurin series for $cos(x)$to compute the value of $cos(5^circ)$ correct to five decimal places.Number of terms to estimate the integral within the indicated accuracy using series!User remainder theorem to estimate $ sum^infty_k=1 frac12(-1)^k+1k^2 $ within $frac25$How do you find nth maclaurin/taylor series or polynomial?Solving an integral using first two terms of the Mclaurin series for $f(x)$Show $log(1-x)=-sum_n=1^inftyfracx^nn,forall xin(-1,1)$.Calculating the approximation of an integral using the first four terms of a Maclaurin series.










1












$begingroup$


My question:




How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



So my process is this:



  • find the general formula for this series

  • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

  • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



I have the derivatives of each:



$$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
$$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
$$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
$$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    My question:




    How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




    I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



    So my process is this:



    • find the general formula for this series

    • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

    • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

    Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



    I have the derivatives of each:



    $$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
    $$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
    $$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
    $$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      My question:




      How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




      I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



      So my process is this:



      • find the general formula for this series

      • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

      • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

      Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



      I have the derivatives of each:



      $$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
      $$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
      $$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
      $$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My question:




      How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ln(1+x) do you need to use to estimate ln(1.4) to within 0.001?




      I feel like I'm lost and my textbook that I'm using doesn't really go into how to solve problems like these in the section Taylor series and Maclaurin. Even worse, I'm a bit confused about all of this so I'm not sure where to even proceed.



      So my process is this:



      • find the general formula for this series

      • If it's alternating, find the term so that the error is less than 0.001

      • I can also use the Taylor Inequality to estimate the error.

      Where in the Stewart book does it even go into problems like these?



      I have the derivatives of each:



      $$f'(x) = frac11+x$$
      $$f''(x) = frac-1(1+x)^2$$
      $$f'''(x) = frac2(1+x)(1+x)^4 = frac2(1+x)^3$$
      $$f^iv(x) = frac-6(1+x)^4$$







      sequences-and-series






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 5 mins ago









      TheSimpliFire

      13.2k62464




      13.2k62464










      asked 1 hour ago









      Jwan622Jwan622

      2,41111632




      2,41111632




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



          Use directly



          • classical Taylor expansion :

          $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



          with $x=0.4$ and



          • the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).

          The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such



          $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



          Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




          Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




          Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
          $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
            Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
            $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
            you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
            In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
            In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



            Explicitly,
            $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
            with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193207%2fhow-many-terms-of-the-maclaurin-series-for-ln1x-do-you-need-to-use-to-esti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



              Use directly



              • classical Taylor expansion :

              $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



              with $x=0.4$ and



              • the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).

              The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such



              $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



              Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




              Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




              Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
              $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



                Use directly



                • classical Taylor expansion :

                $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



                with $x=0.4$ and



                • the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).

                The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such



                $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



                Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




                Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




                Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
                $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



                  Use directly



                  • classical Taylor expansion :

                  $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



                  with $x=0.4$ and



                  • the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).

                  The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such



                  $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



                  Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




                  Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




                  Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
                  $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  You don't have to compute the derivatives as you do.



                  Use directly



                  • classical Taylor expansion :

                  $$ln(1+x)=x-tfracx^22+tfracx^33-tfracx^44-...tag1$$



                  with $x=0.4$ and



                  • the theorem about alternating series saying that the error done by truncating this series is less that the module of the first discarded term (i.e., the first one not present in the truncated series).

                  The condition is that this first discarded $n$th term is such



                  $$tfrac0.4^nnleq 0.001$$



                  Due to the fact that $tfrac0.4^66 < 0.001 < tfrac0.4^55$, we have $n=6$.




                  Thus we need $n-1=5$ terms in expansion (1).




                  Verification : $ln(1.4)= 0.3364722366...$ whereas
                  $0.4-tfrac0.4^22+tfrac0.4^33-tfrac0.4^44+tfrac0.4^55=0.3369813333...$. The error $approx 0.0003$ is indeed less than $0.001$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 15 mins ago

























                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Jean MarieJean Marie

                  31.6k42355




                  31.6k42355





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                      Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                      $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                      you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                      In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                      In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                      Explicitly,
                      $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                      with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                        Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                        $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                        you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                        In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                        In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                        Explicitly,
                        $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                        with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                          Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                          $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                          you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                          In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                          In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                          Explicitly,
                          $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                          with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          First of all, you do need the MacLaurin series $$ tag1ln(1+x)=sum_k=0^infty a_kx^k.$$
                          Given that the derivative of $ln(1+x)$ is $frac11+x$, and from the geometric series
                          $$ frac11+x=sum_k=0^infty (-1)^kx^k,$$
                          you ought to see that $a_k=frac(-1)^k-1k$ for $k>0$ (and $a_0=0$).
                          In particular, for $0<x<1$, $(1)$ is an alternating series with secreasong (in absolute value) terms. Hence we can just stop when the further summands would be smaller than the desired error bound, without checking any specific error formula.
                          In other words, we find $n$ with $frac0.4^nn<0.001$ and then take $sum_k=0^n-1frac-(-0.4)^kk$ as our approximation of $ln(1.4)$.



                          Explicitly,
                          $$ ln(1.4)approx 0.4-0.08+0.021overline3-0.0064+0.002048$$
                          with the next summand $-0.000682overline6$ already small enough.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 59 mins ago









                          Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

                          283k23273508




                          283k23273508



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193207%2fhow-many-terms-of-the-maclaurin-series-for-ln1x-do-you-need-to-use-to-esti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                              Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar

                              香港授勳及嘉獎制度 目录 勳章及獎狀類別 嘉獎等級 授勳及嘉獎提名 統計數字 多次獲頒勳章或獎狀的人士 爭議 褫奪機制 参考文献 外部連結 参见 导航菜单統計數字一九九七年七月二日(星期三)香港特別行政區的授勳制度六七暴動領袖獲大紫荊勳章 董建華被斥為肯定殺人放火董建華授勳楊光 議員窮追猛打蘋論:顛倒是非黑白的大紫荊董讚楊光有貢獻避談暴動董拒答授勳楊光原因撤除勳銜撤除勳銜撤除勳銜特首掌「搣柴」生殺權行為失當罪 隨時「搣柴」失長糧政府刊憲 許仕仁郭炳江遭「搣柴」去年中終極上訴失敗 許仕仁郭炳江撤勳章太平紳士猛料阿Sir講古—— 「搣柴」有故一九九八年授勳名單一九九九年授勳名單二○○三年授勳名單二○○八年授勳名單二○○七年授勳名單政府總部禮賓處 - 授勳及嘉獎香港特別行政區勳章綬帶一覽(PDF)(非官方)