Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFinding the distribution when the observations are dependentThe correct probability distribution / way to identify large deviations in a set of daily changes to portfolio valueWhich Distribution Does the Data Point Belong to?Distribution of Sample Means Compared to Population MeanRight skewed asymmetric Gaussian-like distributionModel building and data analysisWhat would the distribution of time spent per day on a given site look like?Distinguish between underlying Distribution and data shape in data transforming?Test to determine whether the empirical distribution for a given day is an outlier compared with other daysError on mean from measurements made from a distribution with a possible long tail

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Measuring resistivity of dielectric liquid

How a 64-bit process virtual address space is divided in Linux?

Need help understanding a power circuit (caps and diodes)

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Some questions about different axiomatic systems for neighbourhoods

Running a General Election and the European Elections together

Newlines in BSD sed vs gsed

Proper way to express "He disappeared them"

Why does the flight controls check come before arming the autobrake on the A320?

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

How do I align (1) and (2)?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

No sign flipping while figuring out the emf of voltaic cell?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Why is my new battery behaving weirdly?



Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFinding the distribution when the observations are dependentThe correct probability distribution / way to identify large deviations in a set of daily changes to portfolio valueWhich Distribution Does the Data Point Belong to?Distribution of Sample Means Compared to Population MeanRight skewed asymmetric Gaussian-like distributionModel building and data analysisWhat would the distribution of time spent per day on a given site look like?Distinguish between underlying Distribution and data shape in data transforming?Test to determine whether the empirical distribution for a given day is an outlier compared with other daysError on mean from measurements made from a distribution with a possible long tail










3












$begingroup$


I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?



My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.



Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?



    My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.



    Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?



      My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.



      Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?



      My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.



      Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?







      distributions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      CauderCauder

      556




      556




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
            $endgroup$
            – Cauder
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
            $endgroup$
            – jbowman
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
            $endgroup$
            – Cauder
            1 hour ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
            $endgroup$
            – Cauder
            1 hour ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.



          enter image description here



          It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:



          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.



            Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)



            More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "65"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400316%2fis-a-distribution-that-is-normal-but-highly-skewed-considered-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
                $endgroup$
                – jbowman
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago















              5












              $begingroup$

              A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
                $endgroup$
                – jbowman
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago













              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered 1 hour ago









              Peter FlomPeter Flom

              76.5k11107213




              76.5k11107213











              • $begingroup$
                What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
                $endgroup$
                – jbowman
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago
















              • $begingroup$
                What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
                $endgroup$
                – jbowman
                1 hour ago










              • $begingroup$
                Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
                $endgroup$
                – Cauder
                1 hour ago















              $begingroup$
              What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
              $endgroup$
              – Cauder
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
              $endgroup$
              – Cauder
              1 hour ago




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
              $endgroup$
              – jbowman
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
              $endgroup$
              – jbowman
              1 hour ago












              $begingroup$
              Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
              $endgroup$
              – Cauder
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
              $endgroup$
              – Cauder
              1 hour ago




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
              $endgroup$
              – Cauder
              1 hour ago




              $begingroup$
              As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
              $endgroup$
              – Cauder
              1 hour ago













              2












              $begingroup$

              If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.



              enter image description here



              It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:



              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.



                enter image description here



                It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:



                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor




                behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.



                  enter image description here



                  It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:



                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.



                  enter image description here



                  It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:



                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution







                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 1 hour ago









                  beholdbehold

                  456




                  456




                  New contributor




                  behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  behold is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.



                      Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)



                      More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.



                        Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)



                        More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.



                          Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)



                          More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.



                          Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)



                          More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 1 hour ago









                          Stephan KolassaStephan Kolassa

                          47.1k7100175




                          47.1k7100175



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400316%2fis-a-distribution-that-is-normal-but-highly-skewed-considered-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                              格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订

                              聖斯德望教堂 (塞克什白堡) 參考資料 导航菜单