Multiprocessing slowing script down Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Project Euler - Problem 54: testing poker handsChinese Poker using classesVIM colors downloader in Python, using multiprocessingFind and display best Poker handWatchdog for multiprocessingLoad balancing consumer and producer with multiprocessingPython tool to reduce number of resistors in circuitSubprocess CSV validator and multiprocessing on PythonDeal three Poker hands of five cards each in PythonForming the best possible poker hand
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
What to do with repeated rejections for phd position
If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?
Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https
Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?
Draw 4 of the same figure in the same tikzpicture
How many time has Arya actually used Needle?
Antipodal Land Area Calculation
Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?
How does Belgium enforce obligatory attendance in elections?
How long can equipment go unused before powering up runs the risk of damage?
How to identify unknown coordinate type and convert to lat/lon?
Drawing spherical mirrors
Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?
How could we fake a moon landing now?
Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript
Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours
Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?
Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?
Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)
Tannaka duality for semisimple groups
Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?
Multiprocessing slowing script down
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Project Euler - Problem 54: testing poker handsChinese Poker using classesVIM colors downloader in Python, using multiprocessingFind and display best Poker handWatchdog for multiprocessingLoad balancing consumer and producer with multiprocessingPython tool to reduce number of resistors in circuitSubprocess CSV validator and multiprocessing on PythonDeal three Poker hands of five cards each in PythonForming the best possible poker hand
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I am writing a script to help me analyze and get statistics for poker hands. After a lot of research I was able to work with bit manipulation and get my statistics very efficiently for one hand. I want, thought, to be able to run it for several times (millions) and I don't know how to to this efficiently. I tried using multiprocess map (probably wrong) and it slowed the script down significantly.
This is what I had originally:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand = h + b
score = eval_hand(candidate_hand)
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What the function is doing:
- It combines 2 cards from hand = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5] and 3 cards from board = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5]
- Evaluates the combination and assign a score for it
- Stores and returns the best score and best rank for all possible combinations between hand and board (total of 100 combinations).
This runs really fast for (1 hand, 1 board) (0.02s) but I want to call this function for a lot of different hands and a lot of different boards for every hand. Tried to implement multiprocessing for this but for my surprise it slowed down to almost 40s.
This is what I tried:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
p = Pool()
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand.append(h+b)
results = p.map(eval_hand, candidate_hand)
for score in results:
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What is wrong with it? Whys is it slowing the script down instead of speeding it up?
Thanks!
python multiprocessing
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a script to help me analyze and get statistics for poker hands. After a lot of research I was able to work with bit manipulation and get my statistics very efficiently for one hand. I want, thought, to be able to run it for several times (millions) and I don't know how to to this efficiently. I tried using multiprocess map (probably wrong) and it slowed the script down significantly.
This is what I had originally:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand = h + b
score = eval_hand(candidate_hand)
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What the function is doing:
- It combines 2 cards from hand = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5] and 3 cards from board = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5]
- Evaluates the combination and assign a score for it
- Stores and returns the best score and best rank for all possible combinations between hand and board (total of 100 combinations).
This runs really fast for (1 hand, 1 board) (0.02s) but I want to call this function for a lot of different hands and a lot of different boards for every hand. Tried to implement multiprocessing for this but for my surprise it slowed down to almost 40s.
This is what I tried:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
p = Pool()
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand.append(h+b)
results = p.map(eval_hand, candidate_hand)
for score in results:
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What is wrong with it? Whys is it slowing the script down instead of speeding it up?
Thanks!
python multiprocessing
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a script to help me analyze and get statistics for poker hands. After a lot of research I was able to work with bit manipulation and get my statistics very efficiently for one hand. I want, thought, to be able to run it for several times (millions) and I don't know how to to this efficiently. I tried using multiprocess map (probably wrong) and it slowed the script down significantly.
This is what I had originally:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand = h + b
score = eval_hand(candidate_hand)
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What the function is doing:
- It combines 2 cards from hand = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5] and 3 cards from board = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5]
- Evaluates the combination and assign a score for it
- Stores and returns the best score and best rank for all possible combinations between hand and board (total of 100 combinations).
This runs really fast for (1 hand, 1 board) (0.02s) but I want to call this function for a lot of different hands and a lot of different boards for every hand. Tried to implement multiprocessing for this but for my surprise it slowed down to almost 40s.
This is what I tried:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
p = Pool()
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand.append(h+b)
results = p.map(eval_hand, candidate_hand)
for score in results:
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What is wrong with it? Whys is it slowing the script down instead of speeding it up?
Thanks!
python multiprocessing
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am writing a script to help me analyze and get statistics for poker hands. After a lot of research I was able to work with bit manipulation and get my statistics very efficiently for one hand. I want, thought, to be able to run it for several times (millions) and I don't know how to to this efficiently. I tried using multiprocess map (probably wrong) and it slowed the script down significantly.
This is what I had originally:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand = h + b
score = eval_hand(candidate_hand)
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What the function is doing:
- It combines 2 cards from hand = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5] and 3 cards from board = [Card1, Card2, Card3, Card4, Card5]
- Evaluates the combination and assign a score for it
- Stores and returns the best score and best rank for all possible combinations between hand and board (total of 100 combinations).
This runs really fast for (1 hand, 1 board) (0.02s) but I want to call this function for a lot of different hands and a lot of different boards for every hand. Tried to implement multiprocessing for this but for my surprise it slowed down to almost 40s.
This is what I tried:
def get_best_combination(hand, board):
candidate_hand = []
best_score = 9999
best_rank = -1
p = Pool()
for h in itertools.combinations(hand, 2):
for b in itertools.combinations(board,3):
candidate_hand.append(h+b)
results = p.map(eval_hand, candidate_hand)
for score in results:
if (score < best_score):
best_score = score
best_rank = hand_rank(best_score)
return best_score, best_rank
What is wrong with it? Whys is it slowing the script down instead of speeding it up?
Thanks!
python multiprocessing
python multiprocessing
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 mins ago
Vandré Dreer BonaiteVandré Dreer Bonaite
72
72
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Vandré Dreer Bonaite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217761%2fmultiprocessing-slowing-script-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Vandré Dreer Bonaite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Vandré Dreer Bonaite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Vandré Dreer Bonaite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Vandré Dreer Bonaite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217761%2fmultiprocessing-slowing-script-down%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown