Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to increase the font size when printing?Is it possible to change the fontsize and simultaneously TabSpacing when printing a notebook in the working enviromentHow to Print a Cell Landscape in a Portrait Orientation Notebook?How can one programatically change Magnification or select others than offered?Printing problem: PDF output has a plot errorStop notebook from auto-scrolling upon printing

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?

Pristine Bit Checking

How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

It's possible to achieve negative score?

On the insanity of kings as an argument against monarchy

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

Why can Shazam do this?

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size



Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to increase the font size when printing?Is it possible to change the fontsize and simultaneously TabSpacing when printing a notebook in the working enviromentHow to Print a Cell Landscape in a Portrait Orientation Notebook?How can one programatically change Magnification or select others than offered?Printing problem: PDF output has a plot errorStop notebook from auto-scrolling upon printing










2












$begingroup$


The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



Do[
Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



    Do[
    Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
    i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


    It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




    the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



    Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



    By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



      Do[
      Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
      i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


      It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




      the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



      Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



      By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



      Do[
      Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
      i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


      It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




      the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



      Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



      By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?







      output-formatting number-form






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 5 mins ago









      m_goldberg

      88.4k872199




      88.4k872199










      asked 7 hours ago









      zyyzyy

      1236




      1236




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



          StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



          Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



          The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



          You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



          Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
          N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



          the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988, It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



            V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



            Here is how you can get your output with Row.



            Column[
            Table[
            Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
            i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


            output



            One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



            numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
            Style[
            Column[
            Table[
            Row[
            "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
            ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
            i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
            FontFamily -> "Arial"]


            styled



            It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "387"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



              StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



              Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



              The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



              You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



              Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
              N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



              the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                5












                $begingroup$

                This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                  StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                  Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                  The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                  You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                  Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                  N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                  the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                  StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                  Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                  The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                  You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                  Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                  N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                  the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 7 hours ago

























                  answered 7 hours ago









                  RomanRoman

                  4,91011130




                  4,91011130





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988, It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                      V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                      Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                      Column[
                      Table[
                      Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                      i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                      output



                      One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                      numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                      Style[
                      Column[
                      Table[
                      Row[
                      "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                      ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                      i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                      FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                      styled



                      It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988, It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                        V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                        Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                        Column[
                        Table[
                        Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                        i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                        output



                        One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                        numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                        Style[
                        Column[
                        Table[
                        Row[
                        "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                        ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                        i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                        FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                        styled



                        It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988, It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                          V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                          Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                          output



                          One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                          numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                          Style[
                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row[
                          "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                          ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                          FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                          styled



                          It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988, It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                          V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                          Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                          output



                          One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                          numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                          Style[
                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row[
                          "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                          ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                          FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                          styled



                          It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 4 mins ago

























                          answered 1 hour ago









                          m_goldbergm_goldberg

                          88.4k872199




                          88.4k872199



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

                              名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                              Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar