Abstracting getter and setter method references for testingMax heap in JavaApp for communicating with another PCB via BluetoothJava class for creating HeadPhone class and Test classFind the first unique character in a stringQuerying Facebook for details of a user's OAuth tokenComparing each element of a list to all other elements of the same listBinary Puzzle Solver - 10000 questionsJava Singleton getter/setterData processing programJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
Test whether all array elements are factors of a number
What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?
Today is the Center
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
Finding angle with pure Geometry.
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance
Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
How could an uplifted falcon's brain work?
"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"
Dragon forelimb placement
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
What are the differences between the usage of 'it' and 'they'?
Pattern match does not work in bash script
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?
Abstracting getter and setter method references for testing
Max heap in JavaApp for communicating with another PCB via BluetoothJava class for creating HeadPhone class and Test classFind the first unique character in a stringQuerying Facebook for details of a user's OAuth tokenComparing each element of a list to all other elements of the same listBinary Puzzle Solver - 10000 questionsJava Singleton getter/setterData processing programJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.
/**
* Example string for testing.
*/
private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";
/**
* Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
*/
@Test
public void testGetterSettersForA()
A a = new A();
assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);
/**
* Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
*/
private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);
/**
* Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
* @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
*/
private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
setter.accept(input);
T getValue = getter.get();
return areEqual(input,getValue);
/**
* Null safe check if two objects are equal.
* @param first the first object.
* @param second the second object.
* @return whether the two objects are equal.
*/
private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
if(first==null)
return second==null;
return first.equals(second);
/**
* Class for testing a getter and setter.
*/
private static final class A
/**
* Variable named c.
*/
private String c;
/**
* Get c.
* @return c.
*/
public String getC()
return c;
/**
* Set c.
* @param c the value to be set.
*/
public void setC(String c)
this.c = c;
java functional-programming
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.
/**
* Example string for testing.
*/
private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";
/**
* Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
*/
@Test
public void testGetterSettersForA()
A a = new A();
assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);
/**
* Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
*/
private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);
/**
* Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
* @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
*/
private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
setter.accept(input);
T getValue = getter.get();
return areEqual(input,getValue);
/**
* Null safe check if two objects are equal.
* @param first the first object.
* @param second the second object.
* @return whether the two objects are equal.
*/
private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
if(first==null)
return second==null;
return first.equals(second);
/**
* Class for testing a getter and setter.
*/
private static final class A
/**
* Variable named c.
*/
private String c;
/**
* Get c.
* @return c.
*/
public String getC()
return c;
/**
* Set c.
* @param c the value to be set.
*/
public void setC(String c)
this.c = c;
java functional-programming
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.
/**
* Example string for testing.
*/
private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";
/**
* Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
*/
@Test
public void testGetterSettersForA()
A a = new A();
assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);
/**
* Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
*/
private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);
/**
* Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
* @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
*/
private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
setter.accept(input);
T getValue = getter.get();
return areEqual(input,getValue);
/**
* Null safe check if two objects are equal.
* @param first the first object.
* @param second the second object.
* @return whether the two objects are equal.
*/
private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
if(first==null)
return second==null;
return first.equals(second);
/**
* Class for testing a getter and setter.
*/
private static final class A
/**
* Variable named c.
*/
private String c;
/**
* Get c.
* @return c.
*/
public String getC()
return c;
/**
* Set c.
* @param c the value to be set.
*/
public void setC(String c)
this.c = c;
java functional-programming
New contributor
$endgroup$
Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.
/**
* Example string for testing.
*/
private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";
/**
* Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
*/
@Test
public void testGetterSettersForA()
A a = new A();
assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);
/**
* Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
*/
private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);
/**
* Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
* @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
*/
private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
setter.accept(input);
T getValue = getter.get();
return areEqual(input,getValue);
/**
* Null safe check if two objects are equal.
* @param first the first object.
* @param second the second object.
* @return whether the two objects are equal.
*/
private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
if(first==null)
return second==null;
return first.equals(second);
/**
* Class for testing a getter and setter.
*/
private static final class A
/**
* Variable named c.
*/
private String c;
/**
* Get c.
* @return c.
*/
public String getC()
return c;
/**
* Set c.
* @param c the value to be set.
*/
public void setC(String c)
this.c = c;
java functional-programming
java functional-programming
New contributor
New contributor
edited 51 secs ago
user3624390
New contributor
asked 9 mins ago
user3624390user3624390
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216993%2fabstracting-getter-and-setter-method-references-for-testing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216993%2fabstracting-getter-and-setter-method-references-for-testing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown