Abstracting getter and setter method references for testingMax heap in JavaApp for communicating with another PCB via BluetoothJava class for creating HeadPhone class and Test classFind the first unique character in a stringQuerying Facebook for details of a user's OAuth tokenComparing each element of a list to all other elements of the same listBinary Puzzle Solver - 10000 questionsJava Singleton getter/setterData processing programJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Today is the Center

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

Finding angle with pure Geometry.

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

How could an uplifted falcon's brain work?

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Dragon forelimb placement

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

What are the differences between the usage of 'it' and 'they'?

Pattern match does not work in bash script

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?



Abstracting getter and setter method references for testing


Max heap in JavaApp for communicating with another PCB via BluetoothJava class for creating HeadPhone class and Test classFind the first unique character in a stringQuerying Facebook for details of a user's OAuth tokenComparing each element of a list to all other elements of the same listBinary Puzzle Solver - 10000 questionsJava Singleton getter/setterData processing programJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0












$begingroup$


Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.



/**
* Example string for testing.
*/
private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";

/**
* Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
*/
@Test
public void testGetterSettersForA()
A a = new A();
assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);


/**
* Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
*/
private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);


/**
* Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
* @param input the object to be set.
* @param setter the setter.
* @param getter the getter.
* @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
*/
private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
setter.accept(input);
T getValue = getter.get();
return areEqual(input,getValue);


/**
* Null safe check if two objects are equal.
* @param first the first object.
* @param second the second object.
* @return whether the two objects are equal.
*/
private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
if(first==null)
return second==null;

return first.equals(second);


/**
* Class for testing a getter and setter.
*/
private static final class A
/**
* Variable named c.
*/
private String c;

/**
* Get c.
* @return c.
*/
public String getC()
return c;


/**
* Set c.
* @param c the value to be set.
*/
public void setC(String c)
this.c = c;










share









New contributor




user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$


















    0












    $begingroup$


    Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.



    /**
    * Example string for testing.
    */
    private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";

    /**
    * Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
    */
    @Test
    public void testGetterSettersForA()
    A a = new A();
    assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);


    /**
    * Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
    * @param input the object to be set.
    * @param setter the setter.
    * @param getter the getter.
    */
    private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
    boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
    assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);


    /**
    * Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
    * @param input the object to be set.
    * @param setter the setter.
    * @param getter the getter.
    * @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
    */
    private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
    setter.accept(input);
    T getValue = getter.get();
    return areEqual(input,getValue);


    /**
    * Null safe check if two objects are equal.
    * @param first the first object.
    * @param second the second object.
    * @return whether the two objects are equal.
    */
    private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
    if(first==null)
    return second==null;

    return first.equals(second);


    /**
    * Class for testing a getter and setter.
    */
    private static final class A
    /**
    * Variable named c.
    */
    private String c;

    /**
    * Get c.
    * @return c.
    */
    public String getC()
    return c;


    /**
    * Set c.
    * @param c the value to be set.
    */
    public void setC(String c)
    this.c = c;










    share









    New contributor




    user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.



      /**
      * Example string for testing.
      */
      private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";

      /**
      * Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
      */
      @Test
      public void testGetterSettersForA()
      A a = new A();
      assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);


      /**
      * Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
      * @param input the object to be set.
      * @param setter the setter.
      * @param getter the getter.
      */
      private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
      boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
      assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);


      /**
      * Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
      * @param input the object to be set.
      * @param setter the setter.
      * @param getter the getter.
      * @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
      */
      private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
      setter.accept(input);
      T getValue = getter.get();
      return areEqual(input,getValue);


      /**
      * Null safe check if two objects are equal.
      * @param first the first object.
      * @param second the second object.
      * @return whether the two objects are equal.
      */
      private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
      if(first==null)
      return second==null;

      return first.equals(second);


      /**
      * Class for testing a getter and setter.
      */
      private static final class A
      /**
      * Variable named c.
      */
      private String c;

      /**
      * Get c.
      * @return c.
      */
      public String getC()
      return c;


      /**
      * Set c.
      * @param c the value to be set.
      */
      public void setC(String c)
      this.c = c;










      share









      New contributor




      user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Is the following code easy to understand? If not how should it be changed to be more understandable. The purpose of this is reducing similar code in unit tests. This avoids repeating lines for calling getters, setters, and checking for equality.



      /**
      * Example string for testing.
      */
      private static final String STRING_EXAMPLE="stringExample";

      /**
      * Test that a getter and setter are consistent.
      */
      @Test
      public void testGetterSettersForA()
      A a = new A();
      assertGetterSetterConsistent(STRING_EXAMPLE,a::setC,a::getC);


      /**
      * Assert that a getter and setter are consistent.
      * @param input the object to be set.
      * @param setter the setter.
      * @param getter the getter.
      */
      private static <T> void assertGetterSetterConsistent(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
      boolean consistent =isSetConsistentToGet(input,setter,getter);
      assertTrue("Getter and Setter should be consistent.",consistent);


      /**
      * Check if the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
      * @param input the object to be set.
      * @param setter the setter.
      * @param getter the getter.
      * @return whether the object being set is the same as the object being gotten.
      */
      private static <T> boolean isSetConsistentToGet(T input, Consumer<T> setter, Supplier<T> getter)
      setter.accept(input);
      T getValue = getter.get();
      return areEqual(input,getValue);


      /**
      * Null safe check if two objects are equal.
      * @param first the first object.
      * @param second the second object.
      * @return whether the two objects are equal.
      */
      private static <T> boolean areEqual(Object first, Object second)
      if(first==null)
      return second==null;

      return first.equals(second);


      /**
      * Class for testing a getter and setter.
      */
      private static final class A
      /**
      * Variable named c.
      */
      private String c;

      /**
      * Get c.
      * @return c.
      */
      public String getC()
      return c;


      /**
      * Set c.
      * @param c the value to be set.
      */
      public void setC(String c)
      this.c = c;








      java functional-programming





      share









      New contributor




      user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share









      New contributor




      user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share








      edited 51 secs ago







      user3624390













      New contributor




      user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 9 mins ago









      user3624390user3624390

      1




      1




      New contributor




      user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user3624390 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216993%2fabstracting-getter-and-setter-method-references-for-testing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          user3624390 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216993%2fabstracting-getter-and-setter-method-references-for-testing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

          Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

          Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar