Use of noexpand in the implementation of TextOrMath for eTeXWhen to use edef, noexpand, and expandafter?Does noexpand have to be a primitive?Problem with nested noexpand and edefReplacement for unexpanded without eTeX extensionWhy do some arguments in a macro need to be preceded by noexpand?How to use noexpand in an edef?Why six noexpand in a row?How can I use noexpand and unexpanded without appending a space to the unexpanded tokens?How should I /protect this command for use in csname?ifx doesn't treat noexpand as relax

Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?

Machine learning testing data

In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?

Salesman text me from his personal phone

Why was the shrink from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)

Rotate ASCII Art by 45 Degrees

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

How to coordinate airplane tickets?

Does Dispel Magic work on Tiny Hut?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

What is a Samsaran Word™?

How does a dynamic QR code work?

Why was Sir Cadogan fired?

Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?

Do creatures with a speed 0ft., fly 30ft. (hover) ever touch the ground?

Different meanings of こわい

What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?

Were days ever written as ordinal numbers when writing day-month-year?

How to calculate the right interval for a timelapse on a boat

GFCI outlets - can they be repaired? Are they really needed at the end of a circuit?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Why were 5.25" floppy drives cheaper than 8"?



Use of noexpand in the implementation of TextOrMath for eTeX


When to use edef, noexpand, and expandafter?Does noexpand have to be a primitive?Problem with nested noexpand and edefReplacement for unexpanded without eTeX extensionWhy do some arguments in a macro need to be preceded by noexpand?How to use noexpand in an edef?Why six noexpand in a row?How can I use noexpand and unexpanded without appending a space to the unexpanded tokens?How should I /protect this command for use in csname?ifx doesn't treat noexpand as relax













4















In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!










share|improve this question






















  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago















4















In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!










share|improve this question






















  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago













4












4








4








In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!










share|improve this question














In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!







macros expansion definition protected-macro






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









frougonfrougon

641611




641611












  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago

















  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago
















thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

– David Carlisle
1 hour ago





thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

– David Carlisle
1 hour ago













Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

– frougon
1 hour ago





Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

– frougon
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482829%2fuse-of-noexpand-in-the-implementation-of-textormath-for-etex%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






        share|improve this answer













        No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        David CarlisleDavid Carlisle

        497k4111441891




        497k4111441891



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482829%2fuse-of-noexpand-in-the-implementation-of-textormath-for-etex%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            瀋陽號驅逐艦 目录 接收與服役 配置反潛直升機 武進三型性能升級 歷史 除役 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Taiwan Air Power海疆老兵-陽字號驅逐艦沿革World Navies Today: Taiwan (Republic of China)DD-839 USS POWER

            波兰旗帜列表 目录 国旗 军旗 其他制服部门旗帜 特别国家机构船只 参考文献 外部链接 导航菜单Polskie flagi, chorągwie, bandery... [波兰旗帜、条幅、船旗等]原始内容Ustawa z dnia 31 stycznia 1980 r. o godle, barwach i hymnie Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz o pieczęciach państwowychZarządzenie Ministra Obrony Narodowej z dnia 14 grudnia 2005 r. zmieniające zarządzenie w sprawie szczegółowych zasad używania znaków Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz ustalenia innych znaków używanych w Siłach Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejZarządzenie Ministra Obrony Narodowej z dnia 29 stycznia 1996 r. w sprawie szczegółowych zasad używania znaków Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz ustalenia innych znaków używanych w Siłach Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejUstawa z dnia 19 lutego 1993 r. o znakach Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejHistoria Marynarki Wojennej RP [波兰海军史]Rozporządzenie Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 12 kwietnia 2002 r. w sprawie wzoru flagi oraz oznakowania jednostek pływających i statków powietrznych Straży GranicznejRozporządzenie Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 18 kwietnia 2005 r. w sprawie wzoru flagi oraz oznakowania jednostek pływających i statków powietrznych PolicjiRozporządzenie Ministra Infrastruktury z dnia 21 października 2005 r. w sprawie wzorów flag dla statków morskich na oznaczenie pełnionej specjalnej służby państwowej oraz okoliczności i warunków ich podnoszenia波兰旗帜波兰

            Indenting and Dedenting ASP code with Python