Use of noexpand in the implementation of TextOrMath for eTeXWhen to use edef, noexpand, and expandafter?Does noexpand have to be a primitive?Problem with nested noexpand and edefReplacement for unexpanded without eTeX extensionWhy do some arguments in a macro need to be preceded by noexpand?How to use noexpand in an edef?Why six noexpand in a row?How can I use noexpand and unexpanded without appending a space to the unexpanded tokens?How should I /protect this command for use in csname?ifx doesn't treat noexpand as relax

Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?

Machine learning testing data

In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?

Salesman text me from his personal phone

Why was the shrink from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)

Rotate ASCII Art by 45 Degrees

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

How to coordinate airplane tickets?

Does Dispel Magic work on Tiny Hut?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

What is a Samsaran Word™?

How does a dynamic QR code work?

Why was Sir Cadogan fired?

Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?

Do creatures with a speed 0ft., fly 30ft. (hover) ever touch the ground?

Different meanings of こわい

What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?

Were days ever written as ordinal numbers when writing day-month-year?

How to calculate the right interval for a timelapse on a boat

GFCI outlets - can they be repaired? Are they really needed at the end of a circuit?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Why were 5.25" floppy drives cheaper than 8"?



Use of noexpand in the implementation of TextOrMath for eTeX


When to use edef, noexpand, and expandafter?Does noexpand have to be a primitive?Problem with nested noexpand and edefReplacement for unexpanded without eTeX extensionWhy do some arguments in a macro need to be preceded by noexpand?How to use noexpand in an edef?Why six noexpand in a row?How can I use noexpand and unexpanded without appending a space to the unexpanded tokens?How should I /protect this command for use in csname?ifx doesn't treat noexpand as relax













4















In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!










share|improve this question






















  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago















4















In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!










share|improve this question






















  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago













4












4








4








In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!










share|improve this question














In latexrelease 2015/01/01, there are two implementations of TextOrMath: one for regular
TeX, the other one for eTeX-like engines (more precisely: those which support protected). My question concerns the latter:



protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
(...) % no problem here
edefTextOrMath#1#2% from latex.ltx
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


I think I understand well these definitions, however I can't figure out why the edef isn't simply written this way:



edefTextOrMath#1#2% from me
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2


Since the internal TextOrMath<space> macro is protected, what is the point of preceding it with noexpand inside the edef? Is it because the author feared that protected might be deficient?..



I made a test like this (ran with pdfTeX):



% From latex.ltx (or p. 153 of source2e.pdf)
protectedexpandafterdefcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname%
ifmmode expandafter@secondoftwo
else expandafter@firstoftwo fi

edefTextOrMath#1#2%
expandafternoexpandcsname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

% My simpler way of doing the same (?)
edefaltTextOrMath#1#2%
csname TextOrMathspaceendcsname
#1#2

showTextOrMath % TextOrMath=macro:#1#2->TextOrMath #1#2.
showaltTextOrMath % altTextOrMath=ditto

ifxTextOrMathaltTextOrMath
identical
else
different
fi

vfill
eject
bye


This test prints 'identical' and seems to indicate that my definition is equivalent to the one in latex.ltx (but slightly simpler). Did I miss something?



Thanks!







macros expansion definition protected-macro






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









frougonfrougon

641611




641611












  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago

















  • thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

    – David Carlisle
    1 hour ago











  • Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

    – frougon
    1 hour ago
















thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

– David Carlisle
1 hour ago





thanks I suppose we could change that:-)

– David Carlisle
1 hour ago













Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

– frougon
1 hour ago





Many thanks for your insight into this, I was really puzzled!

– frougon
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482829%2fuse-of-noexpand-in-the-implementation-of-textormath-for-etex%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....






        share|improve this answer













        No you didn't miss anything, just old habits die hard as we gradually add these modern post 1992 features into the sources....







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        David CarlisleDavid Carlisle

        497k4111441891




        497k4111441891



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482829%2fuse-of-noexpand-in-the-implementation-of-textormath-for-etex%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

            格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订