Why is this estimator biased?How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator

creating a ":KeepCursor" command

How do I delete all blank lines in a buffer?

Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?

Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

What to do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Lowest total scrabble score

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

PTIJ: Haman's bad computer

Why "had" in "[something] we would have made had we used [something]"?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Invalid date error by date command

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Store Credit Card Information in Password Manager?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

Why is short-wave infrared portion of electromagnetic spectrum so sensitive to fire?

Non-trope happy ending?



Why is this estimator biased?


How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator













1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$







estimation poisson-distribution bias






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









QualityQuality

29019




29019







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago







3




3




$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
1 hour ago













$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
$$
E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
$$

for all $s in mathbbR$



Proof.
We just compute:
$$
beginaligned
E[e^s X]
&= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
&= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
&= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
&= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
endaligned
$$

We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
$$
widehattheta
= expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
= prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
$$

then, using independence,
$$
beginaligned
E[widehattheta]
&= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
&= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&neq e^-mu,
endaligned
$$

so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$

As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



$$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



, provided the expectations exist.



Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    Artem MavrinArtem Mavrin

    1,066710




    1,066710











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago















    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago













    3












    $begingroup$

    As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



    $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



    , provided the expectations exist.



    Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



    The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



      $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



      , provided the expectations exist.



      Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



      The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        StubbornAtomStubbornAtom

        2,7771532




        2,7771532



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

            Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

            Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar