Why is this estimator biased?How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator

creating a ":KeepCursor" command

How do I delete all blank lines in a buffer?

Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?

Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

What to do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Lowest total scrabble score

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

PTIJ: Haman's bad computer

Why "had" in "[something] we would have made had we used [something]"?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Invalid date error by date command

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Store Credit Card Information in Password Manager?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

Why is short-wave infrared portion of electromagnetic spectrum so sensitive to fire?

Non-trope happy ending?



Why is this estimator biased?


How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator













1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$







estimation poisson-distribution bias






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









QualityQuality

29019




29019







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago







3




3




$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
1 hour ago













$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
$$
E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
$$

for all $s in mathbbR$



Proof.
We just compute:
$$
beginaligned
E[e^s X]
&= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
&= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
&= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
&= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
endaligned
$$

We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
$$
widehattheta
= expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
= prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
$$

then, using independence,
$$
beginaligned
E[widehattheta]
&= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
&= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&neq e^-mu,
endaligned
$$

so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$

As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



$$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



, provided the expectations exist.



Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    Artem MavrinArtem Mavrin

    1,066710




    1,066710











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      1 hour ago















    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    1 hour ago













    3












    $begingroup$

    As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



    $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



    , provided the expectations exist.



    Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



    The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



      $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



      , provided the expectations exist.



      Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



      The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        StubbornAtomStubbornAtom

        2,7771532




        2,7771532



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            瀋陽號驅逐艦 目录 接收與服役 配置反潛直升機 武進三型性能升級 歷史 除役 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Taiwan Air Power海疆老兵-陽字號驅逐艦沿革World Navies Today: Taiwan (Republic of China)DD-839 USS POWER

            波兰旗帜列表 目录 国旗 军旗 其他制服部门旗帜 特别国家机构船只 参考文献 外部链接 导航菜单Polskie flagi, chorągwie, bandery... [波兰旗帜、条幅、船旗等]原始内容Ustawa z dnia 31 stycznia 1980 r. o godle, barwach i hymnie Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz o pieczęciach państwowychZarządzenie Ministra Obrony Narodowej z dnia 14 grudnia 2005 r. zmieniające zarządzenie w sprawie szczegółowych zasad używania znaków Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz ustalenia innych znaków używanych w Siłach Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejZarządzenie Ministra Obrony Narodowej z dnia 29 stycznia 1996 r. w sprawie szczegółowych zasad używania znaków Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz ustalenia innych znaków używanych w Siłach Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejUstawa z dnia 19 lutego 1993 r. o znakach Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejHistoria Marynarki Wojennej RP [波兰海军史]Rozporządzenie Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 12 kwietnia 2002 r. w sprawie wzoru flagi oraz oznakowania jednostek pływających i statków powietrznych Straży GranicznejRozporządzenie Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 18 kwietnia 2005 r. w sprawie wzoru flagi oraz oznakowania jednostek pływających i statków powietrznych PolicjiRozporządzenie Ministra Infrastruktury z dnia 21 października 2005 r. w sprawie wzorów flag dla statków morskich na oznaczenie pełnionej specjalnej służby państwowej oraz okoliczności i warunków ich podnoszenia波兰旗帜波兰

            Indenting and Dedenting ASP code with Python