wrapper of subset of auto_ptr API that forwards to unique_ptrboost::any replacement with std::unique_ptr supportunique_ptr usage too unwieldyFunction wrapper like std::function that uses “small buffer” allocationCustom class for a borrowed unique_ptr<T>?DeepPtr: a deep-copying unique_ptr wrapper in C++Thread class that uses std::unique_ptrMy implementation for std::unique_ptrBlocking queue implementation with std::unique_ptrUnique_Ptr Implementationunique_ptr basic implementation for single objects

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?

Does capillary rise violate hydrostatic paradox?

Derivative of an interpolated function

What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?

How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?

Travelling in US for more than 90 days

Capacitor electron flow

What is the purpose of using a decision tree?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

"Oh no!" in Latin

A seasonal riddle

What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

1 John in Luther’s Bibel

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to give it to him

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Is there a page on which I can view all Sitecore jobs running?

Mortal danger in mid-grade literature

Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?



wrapper of subset of auto_ptr API that forwards to unique_ptr


boost::any replacement with std::unique_ptr supportunique_ptr usage too unwieldyFunction wrapper like std::function that uses “small buffer” allocationCustom class for a borrowed unique_ptr<T>?DeepPtr: a deep-copying unique_ptr wrapper in C++Thread class that uses std::unique_ptrMy implementation for std::unique_ptrBlocking queue implementation with std::unique_ptrUnique_Ptr Implementationunique_ptr basic implementation for single objects













0












$begingroup$


I read an interesting old question on the Software Engineering SE about how to transition away from std::auto_ptr. So I wrote a wrapper around std::unique_ptr that exposes a subset of std::auto_ptr's API.



The wrapper's mission in life at runtime is to clean up pointers created with new when the scope ends regardless of how the scope is exited. Its job at compile time is to make compilation fail as informatively as possible when fake_autoptr is used in a non-lowest-common-denominator way when the code is compiled as C++11 or later.



The example given in the old question is this. This example is not leveraging many of the things that an autoptr can do. I think, but am not 100% certain that the autoptr's job here is just to run delete when its destructor is called and not to steal resources from other autoptrs.



// NOT MINE DO NOT REVIEW

Foo* GetFoo()

autoptr<Foo> ptr(new Foo);

// Initialize Foo
ptr->Initialize(...);

// Now configure remaining attributes
ptr->SomeSetting(...);

return ptr.release();



Here is the wrapper I came up with.



#ifndef FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED
#define FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED 1

#include <memory>
#include <type_traits>


namespace fake_autoptr_ns
namespace detail
template <class T>
void destroy(T* goner)
delete goner;



template <class T>
class fake_autoptr
public:
std::unique_ptr<T, decltype(&detail::destroy<T>)> uniqptr_;
using my_uniqptr = decltype(uniqptr_);

fake_autoptr() = delete;
~fake_autoptr() = default;

template <class CtorArg>
explicit fake_autoptr(CtorArg something) : uniqptr_(something, detail::destroy<T>)
static_assert(std::is_same<T*, CtorArg>::value, "constructor argument must be T*");



// delete special member functions
explicit fake_autoptr(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
explicit fake_autoptr(fake_autoptr<T>&&) = delete;
fake_autoptr& operator=(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
fake_autoptr& operator=(fake_autoptr<T> &&) = delete;

T& operator*() = delete;
T* get() = delete;

const std::unique_ptr<T>& operator->() const
return uniqptr_;


my_uniqptr& operator->()
return uniqptr_;


T* release()
return uniqptr_.release();


const T* release() const = delete;

void reset() = delete;

void reset() const = delete;
;


#endif // FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED


This is less interesting, but here's a smoke test to make sure it works



#include "fake_autoptr.hpp"
#include <cstdio>

struct TwoInts
int int1;
int int2;
void print_first_int()
printf("1st %dn", int1);

void print_second_int()
printf("2nd %dn", int2);

;


TwoInts* GetInt()

using namespace fake_autoptr_ns;
fake_autoptr<TwoInts> ptr(new TwoInts3, 7);
ptr->print_first_int();
ptr->print_second_int();
return ptr.release();


int main()
TwoInts *t = GetInt();
delete t;
return 0;









share









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I read an interesting old question on the Software Engineering SE about how to transition away from std::auto_ptr. So I wrote a wrapper around std::unique_ptr that exposes a subset of std::auto_ptr's API.



    The wrapper's mission in life at runtime is to clean up pointers created with new when the scope ends regardless of how the scope is exited. Its job at compile time is to make compilation fail as informatively as possible when fake_autoptr is used in a non-lowest-common-denominator way when the code is compiled as C++11 or later.



    The example given in the old question is this. This example is not leveraging many of the things that an autoptr can do. I think, but am not 100% certain that the autoptr's job here is just to run delete when its destructor is called and not to steal resources from other autoptrs.



    // NOT MINE DO NOT REVIEW

    Foo* GetFoo()

    autoptr<Foo> ptr(new Foo);

    // Initialize Foo
    ptr->Initialize(...);

    // Now configure remaining attributes
    ptr->SomeSetting(...);

    return ptr.release();



    Here is the wrapper I came up with.



    #ifndef FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED
    #define FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED 1

    #include <memory>
    #include <type_traits>


    namespace fake_autoptr_ns
    namespace detail
    template <class T>
    void destroy(T* goner)
    delete goner;



    template <class T>
    class fake_autoptr
    public:
    std::unique_ptr<T, decltype(&detail::destroy<T>)> uniqptr_;
    using my_uniqptr = decltype(uniqptr_);

    fake_autoptr() = delete;
    ~fake_autoptr() = default;

    template <class CtorArg>
    explicit fake_autoptr(CtorArg something) : uniqptr_(something, detail::destroy<T>)
    static_assert(std::is_same<T*, CtorArg>::value, "constructor argument must be T*");



    // delete special member functions
    explicit fake_autoptr(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
    explicit fake_autoptr(fake_autoptr<T>&&) = delete;
    fake_autoptr& operator=(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
    fake_autoptr& operator=(fake_autoptr<T> &&) = delete;

    T& operator*() = delete;
    T* get() = delete;

    const std::unique_ptr<T>& operator->() const
    return uniqptr_;


    my_uniqptr& operator->()
    return uniqptr_;


    T* release()
    return uniqptr_.release();


    const T* release() const = delete;

    void reset() = delete;

    void reset() const = delete;
    ;


    #endif // FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED


    This is less interesting, but here's a smoke test to make sure it works



    #include "fake_autoptr.hpp"
    #include <cstdio>

    struct TwoInts
    int int1;
    int int2;
    void print_first_int()
    printf("1st %dn", int1);

    void print_second_int()
    printf("2nd %dn", int2);

    ;


    TwoInts* GetInt()

    using namespace fake_autoptr_ns;
    fake_autoptr<TwoInts> ptr(new TwoInts3, 7);
    ptr->print_first_int();
    ptr->print_second_int();
    return ptr.release();


    int main()
    TwoInts *t = GetInt();
    delete t;
    return 0;









    share









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I read an interesting old question on the Software Engineering SE about how to transition away from std::auto_ptr. So I wrote a wrapper around std::unique_ptr that exposes a subset of std::auto_ptr's API.



      The wrapper's mission in life at runtime is to clean up pointers created with new when the scope ends regardless of how the scope is exited. Its job at compile time is to make compilation fail as informatively as possible when fake_autoptr is used in a non-lowest-common-denominator way when the code is compiled as C++11 or later.



      The example given in the old question is this. This example is not leveraging many of the things that an autoptr can do. I think, but am not 100% certain that the autoptr's job here is just to run delete when its destructor is called and not to steal resources from other autoptrs.



      // NOT MINE DO NOT REVIEW

      Foo* GetFoo()

      autoptr<Foo> ptr(new Foo);

      // Initialize Foo
      ptr->Initialize(...);

      // Now configure remaining attributes
      ptr->SomeSetting(...);

      return ptr.release();



      Here is the wrapper I came up with.



      #ifndef FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED
      #define FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED 1

      #include <memory>
      #include <type_traits>


      namespace fake_autoptr_ns
      namespace detail
      template <class T>
      void destroy(T* goner)
      delete goner;



      template <class T>
      class fake_autoptr
      public:
      std::unique_ptr<T, decltype(&detail::destroy<T>)> uniqptr_;
      using my_uniqptr = decltype(uniqptr_);

      fake_autoptr() = delete;
      ~fake_autoptr() = default;

      template <class CtorArg>
      explicit fake_autoptr(CtorArg something) : uniqptr_(something, detail::destroy<T>)
      static_assert(std::is_same<T*, CtorArg>::value, "constructor argument must be T*");



      // delete special member functions
      explicit fake_autoptr(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
      explicit fake_autoptr(fake_autoptr<T>&&) = delete;
      fake_autoptr& operator=(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
      fake_autoptr& operator=(fake_autoptr<T> &&) = delete;

      T& operator*() = delete;
      T* get() = delete;

      const std::unique_ptr<T>& operator->() const
      return uniqptr_;


      my_uniqptr& operator->()
      return uniqptr_;


      T* release()
      return uniqptr_.release();


      const T* release() const = delete;

      void reset() = delete;

      void reset() const = delete;
      ;


      #endif // FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED


      This is less interesting, but here's a smoke test to make sure it works



      #include "fake_autoptr.hpp"
      #include <cstdio>

      struct TwoInts
      int int1;
      int int2;
      void print_first_int()
      printf("1st %dn", int1);

      void print_second_int()
      printf("2nd %dn", int2);

      ;


      TwoInts* GetInt()

      using namespace fake_autoptr_ns;
      fake_autoptr<TwoInts> ptr(new TwoInts3, 7);
      ptr->print_first_int();
      ptr->print_second_int();
      return ptr.release();


      int main()
      TwoInts *t = GetInt();
      delete t;
      return 0;









      share









      $endgroup$




      I read an interesting old question on the Software Engineering SE about how to transition away from std::auto_ptr. So I wrote a wrapper around std::unique_ptr that exposes a subset of std::auto_ptr's API.



      The wrapper's mission in life at runtime is to clean up pointers created with new when the scope ends regardless of how the scope is exited. Its job at compile time is to make compilation fail as informatively as possible when fake_autoptr is used in a non-lowest-common-denominator way when the code is compiled as C++11 or later.



      The example given in the old question is this. This example is not leveraging many of the things that an autoptr can do. I think, but am not 100% certain that the autoptr's job here is just to run delete when its destructor is called and not to steal resources from other autoptrs.



      // NOT MINE DO NOT REVIEW

      Foo* GetFoo()

      autoptr<Foo> ptr(new Foo);

      // Initialize Foo
      ptr->Initialize(...);

      // Now configure remaining attributes
      ptr->SomeSetting(...);

      return ptr.release();



      Here is the wrapper I came up with.



      #ifndef FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED
      #define FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED 1

      #include <memory>
      #include <type_traits>


      namespace fake_autoptr_ns
      namespace detail
      template <class T>
      void destroy(T* goner)
      delete goner;



      template <class T>
      class fake_autoptr
      public:
      std::unique_ptr<T, decltype(&detail::destroy<T>)> uniqptr_;
      using my_uniqptr = decltype(uniqptr_);

      fake_autoptr() = delete;
      ~fake_autoptr() = default;

      template <class CtorArg>
      explicit fake_autoptr(CtorArg something) : uniqptr_(something, detail::destroy<T>)
      static_assert(std::is_same<T*, CtorArg>::value, "constructor argument must be T*");



      // delete special member functions
      explicit fake_autoptr(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
      explicit fake_autoptr(fake_autoptr<T>&&) = delete;
      fake_autoptr& operator=(const fake_autoptr<T>&) = delete;
      fake_autoptr& operator=(fake_autoptr<T> &&) = delete;

      T& operator*() = delete;
      T* get() = delete;

      const std::unique_ptr<T>& operator->() const
      return uniqptr_;


      my_uniqptr& operator->()
      return uniqptr_;


      T* release()
      return uniqptr_.release();


      const T* release() const = delete;

      void reset() = delete;

      void reset() const = delete;
      ;


      #endif // FAKE_AUTOPTR_FAKE_AUTOPTR_INCLUDED


      This is less interesting, but here's a smoke test to make sure it works



      #include "fake_autoptr.hpp"
      #include <cstdio>

      struct TwoInts
      int int1;
      int int2;
      void print_first_int()
      printf("1st %dn", int1);

      void print_second_int()
      printf("2nd %dn", int2);

      ;


      TwoInts* GetInt()

      using namespace fake_autoptr_ns;
      fake_autoptr<TwoInts> ptr(new TwoInts3, 7);
      ptr->print_first_int();
      ptr->print_second_int();
      return ptr.release();


      int main()
      TwoInts *t = GetInt();
      delete t;
      return 0;







      c++11





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 7 mins ago









      Gregory NisbetGregory Nisbet

      128111




      128111




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215798%2fwrapper-of-subset-of-auto-ptr-api-that-forwards-to-unique-ptr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215798%2fwrapper-of-subset-of-auto-ptr-api-that-forwards-to-unique-ptr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

          Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

          Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar