Grouping models without dictionary Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Haskell Bencoded Dictionary ParserSwift complexities with DictionaryOrdered dictionary in swift 2Grouping an array by postId and userIdTime manipulation for notification remindersNotifying view controller of changes to any of five types of modelsSimple wrapper function grouping and summarising variableGrouping array elements into batches of at most threeExtension for grouping array into two dimensional array based on element ([] -> [[]])Grouping Date Objects by year and month
Where are Serre’s lectures at Collège de France to be found?
8 Prisoners wearing hats
Generate an RGB colour grid
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?
How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"
Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?
2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?
Using audio cues to encourage good posture
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?
How to find all the available tools in mac terminal?
Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline
Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?
Extracting terms with certain heads in a function
First console to have temporary backward compatibility
Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?
How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)
Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other
What font is "z" in "z-score"?
When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?
Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?
Grouping models without dictionary
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Haskell Bencoded Dictionary ParserSwift complexities with DictionaryOrdered dictionary in swift 2Grouping an array by postId and userIdTime manipulation for notification remindersNotifying view controller of changes to any of five types of modelsSimple wrapper function grouping and summarising variableGrouping array elements into batches of at most threeExtension for grouping array into two dimensional array based on element ([] -> [[]])Grouping Date Objects by year and month
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I want to group an array of structs only using arrays into an array of new structs. In this example I want to group the Person
structs by Job
and put them in new Department
structs and put them in an array.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
func combinator(accumulator: [Department], current: Person) -> [Department]
var accumulator = accumulator
if let index = accumulator.index(where: $0.job == current.job )
var department = accumulator[index]
department.staff.append(current)
accumulator[index] = department
else
accumulator.append(Department(job: current.job, staff: [current]))
return accumulator
var departments: [Department] = initial.reduce([], combinator)
I feel like the if statement in the combinator(accumulator:current:)
function is a bit clunky, is there a better way to write that part or any other part of this piece of code?
functional-programming swift swift3
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to group an array of structs only using arrays into an array of new structs. In this example I want to group the Person
structs by Job
and put them in new Department
structs and put them in an array.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
func combinator(accumulator: [Department], current: Person) -> [Department]
var accumulator = accumulator
if let index = accumulator.index(where: $0.job == current.job )
var department = accumulator[index]
department.staff.append(current)
accumulator[index] = department
else
accumulator.append(Department(job: current.job, staff: [current]))
return accumulator
var departments: [Department] = initial.reduce([], combinator)
I feel like the if statement in the combinator(accumulator:current:)
function is a bit clunky, is there a better way to write that part or any other part of this piece of code?
functional-programming swift swift3
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to group an array of structs only using arrays into an array of new structs. In this example I want to group the Person
structs by Job
and put them in new Department
structs and put them in an array.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
func combinator(accumulator: [Department], current: Person) -> [Department]
var accumulator = accumulator
if let index = accumulator.index(where: $0.job == current.job )
var department = accumulator[index]
department.staff.append(current)
accumulator[index] = department
else
accumulator.append(Department(job: current.job, staff: [current]))
return accumulator
var departments: [Department] = initial.reduce([], combinator)
I feel like the if statement in the combinator(accumulator:current:)
function is a bit clunky, is there a better way to write that part or any other part of this piece of code?
functional-programming swift swift3
$endgroup$
I want to group an array of structs only using arrays into an array of new structs. In this example I want to group the Person
structs by Job
and put them in new Department
structs and put them in an array.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
func combinator(accumulator: [Department], current: Person) -> [Department]
var accumulator = accumulator
if let index = accumulator.index(where: $0.job == current.job )
var department = accumulator[index]
department.staff.append(current)
accumulator[index] = department
else
accumulator.append(Department(job: current.job, staff: [current]))
return accumulator
var departments: [Department] = initial.reduce([], combinator)
I feel like the if statement in the combinator(accumulator:current:)
function is a bit clunky, is there a better way to write that part or any other part of this piece of code?
functional-programming swift swift3
functional-programming swift swift3
asked Jun 22 '17 at 0:51
richyrichy
1134
1134
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Swift 4
i would use the new swift 4 init(grouping:by:)
since you create always new Department
s then the following code is possible.
if you have an existing [Department]
then the code not fit your request.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
let grouped = Dictionary(grouping: initial, by: $0.job )
let departments = grouped.map key, value in Department( job: key, staff: value )
( NOTE: i don't tested it in playground - just from head to the answer)
Swift 3
in Swift 3 you can use an extension to the array to resolve this grouping
public extension Sequence
func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]]
var categories: [U: [Iterator.Element]] = [:]
for element in self
let key = key(element)
if case nil = categories[key]?.append(element)
categories[key] = [element]
return categories
the extension is from here https://stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509 and when you need a more performat grouping you can find it at the link
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is specifically tagged swift3...
$endgroup$
– Mr. Xcoder
Jun 25 '17 at 10:47
$begingroup$
There existing some collection extension for grouping by for swift3 if he like my 2 lines solution.
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 25 '17 at 15:48
$begingroup$
Yeah sorry, I was looking for a Swift 3 solution
$endgroup$
– richy
Jun 25 '17 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@richy then you can use this extension for swift3 to have a groupby in Swift 3: stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
with this a later upgrade to swift 4 is easy :)
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f166367%2fgrouping-models-without-dictionary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Swift 4
i would use the new swift 4 init(grouping:by:)
since you create always new Department
s then the following code is possible.
if you have an existing [Department]
then the code not fit your request.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
let grouped = Dictionary(grouping: initial, by: $0.job )
let departments = grouped.map key, value in Department( job: key, staff: value )
( NOTE: i don't tested it in playground - just from head to the answer)
Swift 3
in Swift 3 you can use an extension to the array to resolve this grouping
public extension Sequence
func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]]
var categories: [U: [Iterator.Element]] = [:]
for element in self
let key = key(element)
if case nil = categories[key]?.append(element)
categories[key] = [element]
return categories
the extension is from here https://stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509 and when you need a more performat grouping you can find it at the link
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is specifically tagged swift3...
$endgroup$
– Mr. Xcoder
Jun 25 '17 at 10:47
$begingroup$
There existing some collection extension for grouping by for swift3 if he like my 2 lines solution.
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 25 '17 at 15:48
$begingroup$
Yeah sorry, I was looking for a Swift 3 solution
$endgroup$
– richy
Jun 25 '17 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@richy then you can use this extension for swift3 to have a groupby in Swift 3: stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
with this a later upgrade to swift 4 is easy :)
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Swift 4
i would use the new swift 4 init(grouping:by:)
since you create always new Department
s then the following code is possible.
if you have an existing [Department]
then the code not fit your request.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
let grouped = Dictionary(grouping: initial, by: $0.job )
let departments = grouped.map key, value in Department( job: key, staff: value )
( NOTE: i don't tested it in playground - just from head to the answer)
Swift 3
in Swift 3 you can use an extension to the array to resolve this grouping
public extension Sequence
func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]]
var categories: [U: [Iterator.Element]] = [:]
for element in self
let key = key(element)
if case nil = categories[key]?.append(element)
categories[key] = [element]
return categories
the extension is from here https://stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509 and when you need a more performat grouping you can find it at the link
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is specifically tagged swift3...
$endgroup$
– Mr. Xcoder
Jun 25 '17 at 10:47
$begingroup$
There existing some collection extension for grouping by for swift3 if he like my 2 lines solution.
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 25 '17 at 15:48
$begingroup$
Yeah sorry, I was looking for a Swift 3 solution
$endgroup$
– richy
Jun 25 '17 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@richy then you can use this extension for swift3 to have a groupby in Swift 3: stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
with this a later upgrade to swift 4 is easy :)
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Swift 4
i would use the new swift 4 init(grouping:by:)
since you create always new Department
s then the following code is possible.
if you have an existing [Department]
then the code not fit your request.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
let grouped = Dictionary(grouping: initial, by: $0.job )
let departments = grouped.map key, value in Department( job: key, staff: value )
( NOTE: i don't tested it in playground - just from head to the answer)
Swift 3
in Swift 3 you can use an extension to the array to resolve this grouping
public extension Sequence
func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]]
var categories: [U: [Iterator.Element]] = [:]
for element in self
let key = key(element)
if case nil = categories[key]?.append(element)
categories[key] = [element]
return categories
the extension is from here https://stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509 and when you need a more performat grouping you can find it at the link
$endgroup$
Swift 4
i would use the new swift 4 init(grouping:by:)
since you create always new Department
s then the following code is possible.
if you have an existing [Department]
then the code not fit your request.
enum Job
case developer
case programmer
case coder
struct Person
let id: Int
let job: Job
struct Department
let job: Job
var staff: [Person]
mutating func addStaff(_ person: Person)
staff.append(person)
let initial = [
Person(id: 0, job: .developer),
Person(id: 1, job: .developer),
Person(id: 2, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 3, job: .programmer),
Person(id: 4, job: .coder)
]
let grouped = Dictionary(grouping: initial, by: $0.job )
let departments = grouped.map key, value in Department( job: key, staff: value )
( NOTE: i don't tested it in playground - just from head to the answer)
Swift 3
in Swift 3 you can use an extension to the array to resolve this grouping
public extension Sequence
func group<U: Hashable>(by key: (Iterator.Element) -> U) -> [U:[Iterator.Element]]
var categories: [U: [Iterator.Element]] = [:]
for element in self
let key = key(element)
if case nil = categories[key]?.append(element)
categories[key] = [element]
return categories
the extension is from here https://stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509 and when you need a more performat grouping you can find it at the link
edited Jun 26 '17 at 16:01
answered Jun 22 '17 at 21:49
mueschamuescha
1765
1765
1
$begingroup$
This is specifically tagged swift3...
$endgroup$
– Mr. Xcoder
Jun 25 '17 at 10:47
$begingroup$
There existing some collection extension for grouping by for swift3 if he like my 2 lines solution.
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 25 '17 at 15:48
$begingroup$
Yeah sorry, I was looking for a Swift 3 solution
$endgroup$
– richy
Jun 25 '17 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@richy then you can use this extension for swift3 to have a groupby in Swift 3: stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
with this a later upgrade to swift 4 is easy :)
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
This is specifically tagged swift3...
$endgroup$
– Mr. Xcoder
Jun 25 '17 at 10:47
$begingroup$
There existing some collection extension for grouping by for swift3 if he like my 2 lines solution.
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 25 '17 at 15:48
$begingroup$
Yeah sorry, I was looking for a Swift 3 solution
$endgroup$
– richy
Jun 25 '17 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@richy then you can use this extension for swift3 to have a groupby in Swift 3: stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
with this a later upgrade to swift 4 is easy :)
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
1
1
$begingroup$
This is specifically tagged swift3...
$endgroup$
– Mr. Xcoder
Jun 25 '17 at 10:47
$begingroup$
This is specifically tagged swift3...
$endgroup$
– Mr. Xcoder
Jun 25 '17 at 10:47
$begingroup$
There existing some collection extension for grouping by for swift3 if he like my 2 lines solution.
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 25 '17 at 15:48
$begingroup$
There existing some collection extension for grouping by for swift3 if he like my 2 lines solution.
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 25 '17 at 15:48
$begingroup$
Yeah sorry, I was looking for a Swift 3 solution
$endgroup$
– richy
Jun 25 '17 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Yeah sorry, I was looking for a Swift 3 solution
$endgroup$
– richy
Jun 25 '17 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@richy then you can use this extension for swift3 to have a groupby in Swift 3: stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
@richy then you can use this extension for swift3 to have a groupby in Swift 3: stackoverflow.com/a/31220067/1930509
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
with this a later upgrade to swift 4 is easy :)
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
$begingroup$
with this a later upgrade to swift 4 is easy :)
$endgroup$
– muescha
Jun 26 '17 at 15:53
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f166367%2fgrouping-models-without-dictionary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown