Module with helper functions to initialize or reinitialize a Slick carouselFirst “Revealing Module” implementationMini school database with JS revealing module patternRock-Paper-Scissors with the revealing module patternRock, Paper, Scissors, and the Revealing Module PatternGoogle Maps API implementation with a revealing module patternClipboard support in jQuery using revealing module patternPig Dice Game: Luck game to get to 100 pointsReusable carousel slider component using the revealing module patternJavascript 5 Module Pattern internal nameImage carousel with jQuery 3.3.1

Add an angle to a sphere

Is this relativistic mass?

Copycat chess is back

Finding files for which a command fails

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Lied on resume at previous job

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

How can I add custom success page

Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

Check if two datetimes are between two others

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?



Module with helper functions to initialize or reinitialize a Slick carousel


First “Revealing Module” implementationMini school database with JS revealing module patternRock-Paper-Scissors with the revealing module patternRock, Paper, Scissors, and the Revealing Module PatternGoogle Maps API implementation with a revealing module patternClipboard support in jQuery using revealing module patternPig Dice Game: Luck game to get to 100 pointsReusable carousel slider component using the revealing module patternJavascript 5 Module Pattern internal nameImage carousel with jQuery 3.3.1






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


I been getting into javascript patterns and would love to get some feedback. I notice that I got some general helper functions. Is this a good approach of dealing with it?



// carousel.js

var Carousel = (function()
var timeout = 340;

function init()
applyForTheseQueries();

$(window).on('resize', Helpers.debounce(function()
applyForTheseQueries();
, timeout));


function applyForTheseQueries()
var $carousel = $('.js-slick');
var query = $carousel.data('query');
var mediaQuery = Helpers.executeFunctionByName(query, window);

if (mediaQuery && !$carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
$carousel.addClass('init-done').slick();
else if (!mediaQuery && $carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
$carousel.removeClass('init-done').slick('unslick');



return
init: init
;
)();

$(function()
Carousel.init();
);



// helpers.js

var Helpers = (function()
function executeFunctionByName(functionName, context)
var args = [].slice.call(arguments).splice(2);
var namespaces = functionName.split(".");
var func = namespaces.pop();

for (var i = 0; i < namespaces.length; i++)
context = context[namespaces[i]];


return context[func].apply(context, args);


function debounce(func, wait, immediate)
var timeout;
return function()
var context = this;
var args = arguments;

var later = function()
timeout = null;
if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args);
;

var callNow = immediate && !timeout;
clearTimeout(timeout);
timeout = setTimeout(later, wait);

if (callNow) func.apply(context, args);
;
;

return
executeFunctionByName: executeFunctionByName,
debounce: debounce
;
)();









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.





















    4












    $begingroup$


    I been getting into javascript patterns and would love to get some feedback. I notice that I got some general helper functions. Is this a good approach of dealing with it?



    // carousel.js

    var Carousel = (function()
    var timeout = 340;

    function init()
    applyForTheseQueries();

    $(window).on('resize', Helpers.debounce(function()
    applyForTheseQueries();
    , timeout));


    function applyForTheseQueries()
    var $carousel = $('.js-slick');
    var query = $carousel.data('query');
    var mediaQuery = Helpers.executeFunctionByName(query, window);

    if (mediaQuery && !$carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
    $carousel.addClass('init-done').slick();
    else if (!mediaQuery && $carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
    $carousel.removeClass('init-done').slick('unslick');



    return
    init: init
    ;
    )();

    $(function()
    Carousel.init();
    );



    // helpers.js

    var Helpers = (function()
    function executeFunctionByName(functionName, context)
    var args = [].slice.call(arguments).splice(2);
    var namespaces = functionName.split(".");
    var func = namespaces.pop();

    for (var i = 0; i < namespaces.length; i++)
    context = context[namespaces[i]];


    return context[func].apply(context, args);


    function debounce(func, wait, immediate)
    var timeout;
    return function()
    var context = this;
    var args = arguments;

    var later = function()
    timeout = null;
    if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args);
    ;

    var callNow = immediate && !timeout;
    clearTimeout(timeout);
    timeout = setTimeout(later, wait);

    if (callNow) func.apply(context, args);
    ;
    ;

    return
    executeFunctionByName: executeFunctionByName,
    debounce: debounce
    ;
    )();









    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$




    bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      I been getting into javascript patterns and would love to get some feedback. I notice that I got some general helper functions. Is this a good approach of dealing with it?



      // carousel.js

      var Carousel = (function()
      var timeout = 340;

      function init()
      applyForTheseQueries();

      $(window).on('resize', Helpers.debounce(function()
      applyForTheseQueries();
      , timeout));


      function applyForTheseQueries()
      var $carousel = $('.js-slick');
      var query = $carousel.data('query');
      var mediaQuery = Helpers.executeFunctionByName(query, window);

      if (mediaQuery && !$carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
      $carousel.addClass('init-done').slick();
      else if (!mediaQuery && $carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
      $carousel.removeClass('init-done').slick('unslick');



      return
      init: init
      ;
      )();

      $(function()
      Carousel.init();
      );



      // helpers.js

      var Helpers = (function()
      function executeFunctionByName(functionName, context)
      var args = [].slice.call(arguments).splice(2);
      var namespaces = functionName.split(".");
      var func = namespaces.pop();

      for (var i = 0; i < namespaces.length; i++)
      context = context[namespaces[i]];


      return context[func].apply(context, args);


      function debounce(func, wait, immediate)
      var timeout;
      return function()
      var context = this;
      var args = arguments;

      var later = function()
      timeout = null;
      if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args);
      ;

      var callNow = immediate && !timeout;
      clearTimeout(timeout);
      timeout = setTimeout(later, wait);

      if (callNow) func.apply(context, args);
      ;
      ;

      return
      executeFunctionByName: executeFunctionByName,
      debounce: debounce
      ;
      )();









      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I been getting into javascript patterns and would love to get some feedback. I notice that I got some general helper functions. Is this a good approach of dealing with it?



      // carousel.js

      var Carousel = (function()
      var timeout = 340;

      function init()
      applyForTheseQueries();

      $(window).on('resize', Helpers.debounce(function()
      applyForTheseQueries();
      , timeout));


      function applyForTheseQueries()
      var $carousel = $('.js-slick');
      var query = $carousel.data('query');
      var mediaQuery = Helpers.executeFunctionByName(query, window);

      if (mediaQuery && !$carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
      $carousel.addClass('init-done').slick();
      else if (!mediaQuery && $carousel.hasClass('init-done'))
      $carousel.removeClass('init-done').slick('unslick');



      return
      init: init
      ;
      )();

      $(function()
      Carousel.init();
      );



      // helpers.js

      var Helpers = (function()
      function executeFunctionByName(functionName, context)
      var args = [].slice.call(arguments).splice(2);
      var namespaces = functionName.split(".");
      var func = namespaces.pop();

      for (var i = 0; i < namespaces.length; i++)
      context = context[namespaces[i]];


      return context[func].apply(context, args);


      function debounce(func, wait, immediate)
      var timeout;
      return function()
      var context = this;
      var args = arguments;

      var later = function()
      timeout = null;
      if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args);
      ;

      var callNow = immediate && !timeout;
      clearTimeout(timeout);
      timeout = setTimeout(later, wait);

      if (callNow) func.apply(context, args);
      ;
      ;

      return
      executeFunctionByName: executeFunctionByName,
      debounce: debounce
      ;
      )();






      javascript revealing-module-pattern






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 21 '17 at 15:26









      200_success

      131k17157422




      131k17157422










      asked Feb 21 '17 at 13:36









      Dejan.SDejan.S

      1463




      1463





      bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Yes, this is a nice, clean way to do it. I do not see smth wrong here. You have your helper methods isolated, they are exposed correctly, and the methods within are dry, they only care for what they get from arguments, and they return one thing only.



          Maybe you have to get sure that nothing breaks if init() gets called for more than one times, that is the one thing I would suggest.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "196"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f155931%2fmodule-with-helper-functions-to-initialize-or-reinitialize-a-slick-carousel%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Yes, this is a nice, clean way to do it. I do not see smth wrong here. You have your helper methods isolated, they are exposed correctly, and the methods within are dry, they only care for what they get from arguments, and they return one thing only.



            Maybe you have to get sure that nothing breaks if init() gets called for more than one times, that is the one thing I would suggest.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              Yes, this is a nice, clean way to do it. I do not see smth wrong here. You have your helper methods isolated, they are exposed correctly, and the methods within are dry, they only care for what they get from arguments, and they return one thing only.



              Maybe you have to get sure that nothing breaks if init() gets called for more than one times, that is the one thing I would suggest.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Yes, this is a nice, clean way to do it. I do not see smth wrong here. You have your helper methods isolated, they are exposed correctly, and the methods within are dry, they only care for what they get from arguments, and they return one thing only.



                Maybe you have to get sure that nothing breaks if init() gets called for more than one times, that is the one thing I would suggest.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Yes, this is a nice, clean way to do it. I do not see smth wrong here. You have your helper methods isolated, they are exposed correctly, and the methods within are dry, they only care for what they get from arguments, and they return one thing only.



                Maybe you have to get sure that nothing breaks if init() gets called for more than one times, that is the one thing I would suggest.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 13 '18 at 19:08









                JohnPanJohnPan

                1862




                1862



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f155931%2fmodule-with-helper-functions-to-initialize-or-reinitialize-a-slick-carousel%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                    Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

                    Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar