Why we try to capture variability? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is a good way to measure how well a set of data fits to a set of functionsScore Variance of supplementary individuals in PCAWhich variables should I transform, center, and/or standardize in my data for Principal Component Analysis?Aside from regression coefficients, what are commonly used approaches to measure one variable's “sensitivity” to another variable?Where is the indeterminacy of factor values on this plot explaining factor analysis?Geometric understanding of PCA in the subject (dual) spaceWhat is the fastest way to compute PC1 scores, without performing the whole PCA?Do the variables having high partial correlation also contributes to a high proportion of variance explained by the computed principal components?PCA: how to select eigen vectors corresponding to small eigenvalues for regressionwhat to say about low variability

Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)

Sum letters are not two different

What order were files/directories output in dir?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

Misunderstanding of Sylow theory

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Trademark violation for app?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Can a Beast Master ranger change beast companions?

One-one communication

What does this say in Elvish?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

How to run automated tests after each commit?

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Co-worker has annoying ringtone

Most bit efficient text communication method?

C's equality operator on converted pointers

Electrolysis of water: Which equations to use? (IB Chem)

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?



Why we try to capture variability?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is a good way to measure how well a set of data fits to a set of functionsScore Variance of supplementary individuals in PCAWhich variables should I transform, center, and/or standardize in my data for Principal Component Analysis?Aside from regression coefficients, what are commonly used approaches to measure one variable's “sensitivity” to another variable?Where is the indeterminacy of factor values on this plot explaining factor analysis?Geometric understanding of PCA in the subject (dual) spaceWhat is the fastest way to compute PC1 scores, without performing the whole PCA?Do the variables having high partial correlation also contributes to a high proportion of variance explained by the computed principal components?PCA: how to select eigen vectors corresponding to small eigenvalues for regressionwhat to say about low variability



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$


















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am new to Statistics and I have a Mathematics background. In Statistics, particularly in Linear Regression and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) so far what I have understood is that the main idea is to try to capture as much as possible variability present in the data. In linear regression, while calculating $ R^2 (R squared)$ measure we are checking the proportion of variability captured by our model and in PCA we are forming a new basis along which our data has the maximum possible variability. Is there any significant result behind this logic? I mean why we have to go after variability? Any help in this matter will be appreciated.







      regression pca variability






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 8 mins ago









      Karolis Koncevičius

      2,38341630




      2,38341630






      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      SatishSatish

      112




      112




      New contributor




      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Satish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



          This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



          Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404014%2fwhy-we-try-to-capture-variability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



            This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



            Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



              This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



              Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



                This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



                Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                In many cases the reason we use regression is to explain variability. In that sense, how much variability is explained is one of the key measures of success.



                This may be more clear with an example. I recently worked on a project where we created a regression model to explain employee performance. We did this because our stakeholders (senior management) wanted to know why some employees were performing well and others weren't. That is, why do we see variance in employee performance?



                Phrased this way it should be clear that a key performance metric for our model is how much variability it anticipates.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                indigochildindigochild

                1535




                1535




















                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Satish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404014%2fwhy-we-try-to-capture-variability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                    格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订