Attenuator Cascaded Connection The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In

Fractional alignment

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

It's possible to achieve negative score?

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

Why can Shazam do this?

Monty Hall variation

Carnot-Caratheodory metric

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

Is it worth rebuilding a wheel myself to save money?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Evaluating number of iteration with a certain map with While

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?

I see my dog run

How to manage monthly salary

Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?

Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid

Lethal sonic weapons

Families of ordered set partitions with disjoint blocks

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size



Attenuator Cascaded Connection



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In










1












$begingroup$


PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?










share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    1 hour ago
















1












$begingroup$


PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?










share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    1 hour ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?










share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?







rf-power electronics






share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Mike Waters

3,7772635




3,7772635






New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









nandflash1nandflash1

252




252




New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    1 hour ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
1 hour ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    4 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f13244%2fattenuator-cascaded-connection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    4 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    4 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









Brian K1LIBrian K1LI

1,737114




1,737114











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
4 hours ago










nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f13244%2fattenuator-cascaded-connection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

瀋陽號驅逐艦 目录 接收與服役 配置反潛直升機 武進三型性能升級 歷史 除役 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Taiwan Air Power海疆老兵-陽字號驅逐艦沿革World Navies Today: Taiwan (Republic of China)DD-839 USS POWER

波兰旗帜列表 目录 国旗 军旗 其他制服部门旗帜 特别国家机构船只 参考文献 外部链接 导航菜单Polskie flagi, chorągwie, bandery... [波兰旗帜、条幅、船旗等]原始内容Ustawa z dnia 31 stycznia 1980 r. o godle, barwach i hymnie Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz o pieczęciach państwowychZarządzenie Ministra Obrony Narodowej z dnia 14 grudnia 2005 r. zmieniające zarządzenie w sprawie szczegółowych zasad używania znaków Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz ustalenia innych znaków używanych w Siłach Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejZarządzenie Ministra Obrony Narodowej z dnia 29 stycznia 1996 r. w sprawie szczegółowych zasad używania znaków Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz ustalenia innych znaków używanych w Siłach Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejUstawa z dnia 19 lutego 1993 r. o znakach Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej PolskiejHistoria Marynarki Wojennej RP [波兰海军史]Rozporządzenie Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 12 kwietnia 2002 r. w sprawie wzoru flagi oraz oznakowania jednostek pływających i statków powietrznych Straży GranicznejRozporządzenie Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji z dnia 18 kwietnia 2005 r. w sprawie wzoru flagi oraz oznakowania jednostek pływających i statków powietrznych PolicjiRozporządzenie Ministra Infrastruktury z dnia 21 października 2005 r. w sprawie wzorów flag dla statków morskich na oznaczenie pełnionej specjalnej służby państwowej oraz okoliczności i warunków ich podnoszenia波兰旗帜波兰

Indenting and Dedenting ASP code with Python