Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digitsDivisibility by 7 rule, and Congruence Arithmetic LawsWhy is $9$ special in testing divisiblity by $9$ by summing decimal digits? (casting out nines)Divisibility criteria for $7,11,13,17,19$Divisibility Rules for Bases other than $10$divisibility for numbers like 13,17 and 19 - Compartmentalization methodTrying to prove a congruence for Stirling numbers of the second kindThe following is a necessary condition for a number to be prime, from its digit expansion. Has it been referred somewhere?Let N be a four digit number, and N' be N with its digits reversed. Prove that N-N' is divisble by 9. Prove that N+N' is divisble by 11.Digit-sum division check in base-$n$Rules of thumb for divisibilityDivisibility by 7 involving grouping and alternating sumDivisibility of a 7-digit number by 21Divisibility Rule Proof about Special Numbers

Finding angle with pure Geometry.

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

How to format long polynomial?

Theorems that impeded progress

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

Mage Armor with Defense fighting style (for Adventurers League bladeslinger)

Today is the Center

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

To string or not to string

"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

Modeling an IP Address

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?

Mathematical cryptic clues

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items



Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits


Divisibility by 7 rule, and Congruence Arithmetic LawsWhy is $9$ special in testing divisiblity by $9$ by summing decimal digits? (casting out nines)Divisibility criteria for $7,11,13,17,19$Divisibility Rules for Bases other than $10$divisibility for numbers like 13,17 and 19 - Compartmentalization methodTrying to prove a congruence for Stirling numbers of the second kindThe following is a necessary condition for a number to be prime, from its digit expansion. Has it been referred somewhere?Let N be a four digit number, and N' be N with its digits reversed. Prove that N-N' is divisble by 9. Prove that N+N' is divisble by 11.Digit-sum division check in base-$n$Rules of thumb for divisibilityDivisibility by 7 involving grouping and alternating sumDivisibility of a 7-digit number by 21Divisibility Rule Proof about Special Numbers













2












$begingroup$


Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    3 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    3 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose that we are given a two digit number $AB$, where $A$ and $B$ represents the digits, i.e 21 would be A=2 , B=1. I wish to prove that the sum of $AB$ and $BA$ is always divisible by $11$.
My initial idée was to use the fact that if a number is divisible by $11$ then the sum of its digits with alternating sign is also divisible by 11. For example
$$1-2+3-3+2-1=0 $$
so $11$ divides $123321$. So my proof would then be to consider the two digit number $(A+B)(B+A)$ or $CC$ which clearly is divisible by $11$ by the above statement if $C$ is $1$ through $9$. However, I am having truble justifying the case were $A+B$ is greater than or equal to $10$ and it got me wondering if the more generel is true: Let $ABCD...$ be a $n-digit$ number, if $$A-B+C-... equiv 0 (mod 11)$$
then $$S=sum_k=1^n(A+B+C+...)10^k equiv0(mod 11)$$
I am not really familliar with the whole congruence thingy, so incase the above is trivial I would be greatful on some source which could aid the solving of the above . Any tips or suggestion are also very welcome







divisibility






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







André Armatowski

















asked 3 hours ago









André ArmatowskiAndré Armatowski

233




233











  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/328562/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Use pmod11 to produce $pmod11$. So aequiv bpmod11 produces $aequiv bpmod11$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

More generally, recall that the radix $rm:b:$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0:, $ where $rm: P(x): = d_n x^n +:cdots: d_1 x + d_0:.: $ The reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bar P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bar P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bar P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $,b=10, n=1$.



Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $b$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



    We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



    It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Very clean, totally escaped me!
      $endgroup$
      – André Armatowski
      3 hours ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177167%2fcan-divisibility-rules-for-digits-be-generalized-to-sum-of-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      More generally, recall that the radix $rm:b:$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0:, $ where $rm: P(x): = d_n x^n +:cdots: d_1 x + d_0:.: $ The reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bar P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bar P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bar P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $,b=10, n=1$.



      Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $b$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        More generally, recall that the radix $rm:b:$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0:, $ where $rm: P(x): = d_n x^n +:cdots: d_1 x + d_0:.: $ The reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bar P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bar P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bar P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $,b=10, n=1$.



        Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $b$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          More generally, recall that the radix $rm:b:$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0:, $ where $rm: P(x): = d_n x^n +:cdots: d_1 x + d_0:.: $ The reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bar P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bar P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bar P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $,b=10, n=1$.



          Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $b$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          More generally, recall that the radix $rm:b:$ digit string $rm d_n cdots d_1 d_0 $ denotes a polynomial expression $rm P(b) = d_n b^n +:cdots: + d_1 b + d_0:, $ where $rm: P(x): = d_n x^n +:cdots: d_1 x + d_0:.: $ The reversed (digits) polynomial is $rm bar P(x) = x^n P(1/x).,$ If $rm:n:$ is odd the Polynomial Congruence Rule yields $$rm: mod b!+!1: color#c00bequiv -1 Rightarrow bar P(b) = color#c00b^n P(1/color#c00b) equiv (color#c00-1)^n P(color#c00-1)equiv -P(-1),:$$ therefore we conclude that $rm P(b) + bar P(b)equiv P(-1)-P(-1)equiv 0.,$ OP is case $,b=10, n=1$.



          Remark $ $ Essentially we have twice applied the radix $b$ analog of casting out elevens (the analog of casting out nines).







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

          213k29196654




          213k29196654





















              3












              $begingroup$

              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                3 hours ago















              3












              $begingroup$

              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                3 hours ago













              3












              3








              3





              $begingroup$

              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              It's simpler than you are making it...and no congruences are needed:



              We have $$overline AB=10A+B quad &quad overline BA=10B+A$$



              It follows that $$overline AB+overline BA=11times (A+B)$$ and we are done.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited 3 hours ago

























              answered 3 hours ago









              lulululu

              43.4k25080




              43.4k25080











              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                3 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                Very clean, totally escaped me!
                $endgroup$
                – André Armatowski
                3 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              Very clean, totally escaped me!
              $endgroup$
              – André Armatowski
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Very clean, totally escaped me!
              $endgroup$
              – André Armatowski
              3 hours ago











              1












              $begingroup$

              You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You can easily push through what you were trying though. Say your numbers are $AB$ and $BA$. If $A+Bgt 10$, then write it as $A+B=10+c$; note that $0leq cleq 8$, because two digits cannot add to $19$. That means that when you do the carry, the second digit is $(c+1)$, and so $AB+BA$ will be a three digit number: $1$, then $c+1$, and then $c$. At this point, your test gives you $1-(c+1)+c = 0$, so you get a multiple of $11$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin

                  266k34590920




                  266k34590920



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177167%2fcan-divisibility-rules-for-digits-be-generalized-to-sum-of-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                      格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订