Minkowski spacePoincare group vs Galilean groupMinkowski MetricConservation of phase space volume in Rindler space-timeMinkowski Metric SignatureMinkowski metric — why does it follow from the constancy of the speed of light?Space-like pion electromagnetic form factorMinkowski metric: Why does it look like it does?Understanding space-like hyperplanes in Minkowski spaceCan an a distance in Minkowski space, based on a Euclidean plane, be time-like?How to Construct Proper Spherical Coordinates in Minkowski Spacetime?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )

Pattern match does not work in bash script

Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?

Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

How to add double frame in tcolorbox?

To string or not to string

can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Mage Armor with Defense fighting style (for Adventurers League bladeslinger)

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

Does Unearthed Arcana render Favored Souls redundant?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Why do falling prices hurt debtors?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

How does strength of boric acid solution increase in presence of salicylic acid?



Minkowski space


Poincare group vs Galilean groupMinkowski MetricConservation of phase space volume in Rindler space-timeMinkowski Metric SignatureMinkowski metric — why does it follow from the constancy of the speed of light?Space-like pion electromagnetic form factorMinkowski metric: Why does it look like it does?Understanding space-like hyperplanes in Minkowski spaceCan an a distance in Minkowski space, based on a Euclidean plane, be time-like?How to Construct Proper Spherical Coordinates in Minkowski Spacetime?













1












$begingroup$


In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy



x2=t2-X2>0



Region of space time is time-like.
If its.



x2=t2-X2<0



Region is space-like.
But if



x2=t2-X2=0



` then its "trajectory of light like particles".



I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy



    x2=t2-X2>0



    Region of space time is time-like.
    If its.



    x2=t2-X2<0



    Region is space-like.
    But if



    x2=t2-X2=0



    ` then its "trajectory of light like particles".



    I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
    My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy



      x2=t2-X2>0



      Region of space time is time-like.
      If its.



      x2=t2-X2<0



      Region is space-like.
      But if



      x2=t2-X2=0



      ` then its "trajectory of light like particles".



      I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
      My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      In Minkowski space, coordinates which satisfy



      x2=t2-X2>0



      Region of space time is time-like.
      If its.



      x2=t2-X2<0



      Region is space-like.
      But if



      x2=t2-X2=0



      ` then its "trajectory of light like particles".



      I have understood the first two points about time and space like region but I could not get the third one about "light like particles".
      My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.







      quantum-field-theory special-relativity






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 27 mins ago









      sk9298sk9298

      595




      595




      New contributor




      sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      sk9298 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$


          My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.




          You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.



          An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.



            The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "151"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470979%2fminkowski-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$


              My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.




              You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.



              An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$


                My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.




                You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.



                An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$


                  My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.




                  You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.



                  An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$




                  My confusion is about why just light like particles? there are many other particles at quantum level.




                  You are correct. The terminology is historical in nature. Light was the first massless particle to be discovered. The terminology “lightlike” was established before any other massless particles were discovered. Once other massless particles were discovered it was shown that they also travel along lightlike geodesics, but by then the term “lightlike” was well established.



                  An alternative term with the same meaning as “lightlike” is “null”. If you prefer then you can always use “null” and just understand that people saying “lightlike” mean the same thing.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 17 mins ago









                  DaleDale

                  6,5871829




                  6,5871829





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.



                      The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.



                        The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.



                          The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Only particles with zero mass can travel between two events which are separated by a light-like distance. The trajectory is called light-like because photons (light) are massless, and historically the first example of a massless particle, as well as the only example in the 1910's. There are other massless particles, like gluons which would also be able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance.



                          The reason why only massless particles are able to travel between two events separated by a light-like distance is that it requires you to travel at exactly the speed of light. You can see this by considering the equation $t^2-x^2=0$, this means that $x=pm t$. These equations are with the units such that the speed of light $c=1$. Thus the particle taking this trajectory is travelling at the speed of light.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 20 mins ago









                          LucashWindowWasherLucashWindowWasher

                          30310




                          30310




















                              sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              sk9298 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470979%2fminkowski-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                              格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订