Existance of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moonA world with a moon orbiting much closer than oursOrbiting one star in a binary system: what are the effects of the second star on the planet?Could a civilization engineer supernovae?Two orbits, Four habitable planets in the goldilocks zone?Which gas giant of the solar system could humanity mine and for what resource?How could a TINY Second Moon minimally affect Earth?Is a 1:1 Earth possible in a binary system?How to determine the population size and spread in a fictional ancient world settlingHorseshoe OrbitsDay/night cycle science help?

Dual Irish/Britsh citizens

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

Describing a chess game in a novel

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

How to get the n-th line after a grepped one?

Probably overheated black color SMD pads

Naive Monte Carlo, MCMC and their use in Bayesian Theory

What does "Four-F." mean?

Does multi-classing into Fighter give you heavy armor proficiency?

I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?

Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old

Unfrosted light bulb

Four married couples attend a party. Each person shakes hands with every other person, except their own spouse, exactly once. How many handshakes?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?

Calculate the frequency of characters in a string

Existance of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon

Is there a term for accumulated dirt on the outside of your hands and feet?

What should I install to correct "ld: cannot find -lgbm and -linput" so that I can compile a Rust program?

Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?

Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?



Existance of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon


A world with a moon orbiting much closer than oursOrbiting one star in a binary system: what are the effects of the second star on the planet?Could a civilization engineer supernovae?Two orbits, Four habitable planets in the goldilocks zone?Which gas giant of the solar system could humanity mine and for what resource?How could a TINY Second Moon minimally affect Earth?Is a 1:1 Earth possible in a binary system?How to determine the population size and spread in a fictional ancient world settlingHorseshoe OrbitsDay/night cycle science help?













4












$begingroup$


Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?



  • With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.

  • And occurring each year for one thousand years.

I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.



Thank you!










share|improve this question









New contributor




shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago















4












$begingroup$


Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?



  • With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.

  • And occurring each year for one thousand years.

I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.



Thank you!










share|improve this question









New contributor




shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?



  • With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.

  • And occurring each year for one thousand years.

I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.



Thank you!










share|improve this question









New contributor




shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?



  • With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.

  • And occurring each year for one thousand years.

I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.



Thank you!







space earth-like






share|improve this question









New contributor




shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







shootshi













New contributor




shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









shootshishootshi

233




233




New contributor




shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
    $endgroup$
    – StephenG
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
    $endgroup$
    – shootshi
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.



And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.



enter image description here



A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.



    comet
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg



    I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.



    Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon



    3200 phaeton orbit



    So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141710%2fexistance-of-a-celestial-body-big-enough-for-early-civilization-to-be-thought-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.



      And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.



      enter image description here



      A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        3












        $begingroup$

        Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.



        And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.



        enter image description here



        A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.



          And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.



          enter image description here



          A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.



          And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.



          enter image description here



          A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          LSerniLSerni

          28.3k24990




          28.3k24990





















              0












              $begingroup$

              A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.



              comet
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg



              I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.



              Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.



              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon



              3200 phaeton orbit



              So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.



                comet
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg



                I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.



                Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.



                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon



                3200 phaeton orbit



                So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.



                  comet
                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg



                  I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.



                  Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.



                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon



                  3200 phaeton orbit



                  So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.



                  comet
                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg



                  I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.



                  Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.



                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon



                  3200 phaeton orbit



                  So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 12 mins ago









                  WillkWillk

                  113k27211472




                  113k27211472




















                      shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141710%2fexistance-of-a-celestial-body-big-enough-for-early-civilization-to-be-thought-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                      Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

                      Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar