Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past ContinuousPast Progressive + BEFORE/AFTER + GerundIs this past perfect tense put because of the previous tense?past perfect necessary herePast perfect in “after” and “before” clausesWhy is the past perfect continuous connected to the present?Past perfect and Past perfect continuousIs past perfect necessary in 'It had been here before we came.'?The only use of past perfect tense is to distinguish which event happened first in the past?The past tense instead of the past perfect tensePast Perfect or Present Perfect for the verb “Think”?past perfect continous for an action that has recently stopped?

Constant Current LED Circuit

Does .bashrc contain syntax errors?

Usage and meaning of "up" in "...worth at least a thousand pounds up in London"

Synchronized implementation of a bank account in Java

Light propagating through a sound wave

PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?

Tikz: place node leftmost of two nodes of different widths

Print last inputted byte

Bash - pair each line of file

What exactly term 'companion plants' means?

I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?

Brake pads destroying wheels

How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawn

The average age of first marriage in Russia

Does the attack bonus from a Masterwork weapon stack with the attack bonus from Masterwork ammunition?

Four married couples attend a party. Each person shakes hands with every other person, except their own spouse, exactly once. How many handshakes?

Does multi-classing into Fighter give you heavy armor proficiency?

How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?

Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

What should I install to correct "ld: cannot find -lgbm and -linput" so that I can compile a Rust program?

Unfrosted light bulb

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?



Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous


Past Progressive + BEFORE/AFTER + GerundIs this past perfect tense put because of the previous tense?past perfect necessary herePast perfect in “after” and “before” clausesWhy is the past perfect continuous connected to the present?Past perfect and Past perfect continuousIs past perfect necessary in 'It had been here before we came.'?The only use of past perfect tense is to distinguish which event happened first in the past?The past tense instead of the past perfect tensePast Perfect or Present Perfect for the verb “Think”?past perfect continous for an action that has recently stopped?













2















I've seen this sentence in another post here:




  1. Tom Cruise was thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.



Would it be fine to use the Past-Perfect as well? If so, which tense is better?



Here are a few options that came to my mind:




  1. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.
    or

  2. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.

  3. Tom Cruise had thought of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.










share|improve this question




























    2















    I've seen this sentence in another post here:




    1. Tom Cruise was thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.



    Would it be fine to use the Past-Perfect as well? If so, which tense is better?



    Here are a few options that came to my mind:




    1. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.
      or

    2. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.

    3. Tom Cruise had thought of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      I've seen this sentence in another post here:




      1. Tom Cruise was thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.



      Would it be fine to use the Past-Perfect as well? If so, which tense is better?



      Here are a few options that came to my mind:




      1. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.
        or

      2. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.

      3. Tom Cruise had thought of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.










      share|improve this question
















      I've seen this sentence in another post here:




      1. Tom Cruise was thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.



      Would it be fine to use the Past-Perfect as well? If so, which tense is better?



      Here are a few options that came to my mind:




      1. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before finding a job in the movies.
        or

      2. Tom Cruise had been thinking of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.

      3. Tom Cruise had thought of a career in the church before he found a job in the movies.







      past-perfect past-perfect-continuous






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 47 mins ago







      SunnySideDown

















      asked 1 hour ago









      SunnySideDownSunnySideDown

      504




      504




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          All three of these sentences are grammatical as well. The past perfect tense is no better than the simple past tense in this situation; they're equally good. The word before tells you that the thinking happened, and then the finding happened afterwards.






          share|improve this answer






























            2














            All of these are perfectly acceptable. The forms using "had been thinking" suggest a process of thought which extended over some time, but ended, either when the job was found, or before that. The for with "had thought" suggests a single instance of thought that occurred before the job was found.



            But many native speakers will not make these fine distinctions, and may use any of the four forms in the question interchangeably, with no difference of meaning.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.



















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "481"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201024%2fusing-past-perfect-interchangeably-with-the-past-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              All three of these sentences are grammatical as well. The past perfect tense is no better than the simple past tense in this situation; they're equally good. The word before tells you that the thinking happened, and then the finding happened afterwards.






              share|improve this answer



























                2














                All three of these sentences are grammatical as well. The past perfect tense is no better than the simple past tense in this situation; they're equally good. The word before tells you that the thinking happened, and then the finding happened afterwards.






                share|improve this answer

























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  All three of these sentences are grammatical as well. The past perfect tense is no better than the simple past tense in this situation; they're equally good. The word before tells you that the thinking happened, and then the finding happened afterwards.






                  share|improve this answer













                  All three of these sentences are grammatical as well. The past perfect tense is no better than the simple past tense in this situation; they're equally good. The word before tells you that the thinking happened, and then the finding happened afterwards.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  MixolydianMixolydian

                  3,098511




                  3,098511























                      2














                      All of these are perfectly acceptable. The forms using "had been thinking" suggest a process of thought which extended over some time, but ended, either when the job was found, or before that. The for with "had thought" suggests a single instance of thought that occurred before the job was found.



                      But many native speakers will not make these fine distinctions, and may use any of the four forms in the question interchangeably, with no difference of meaning.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                        2














                        All of these are perfectly acceptable. The forms using "had been thinking" suggest a process of thought which extended over some time, but ended, either when the job was found, or before that. The for with "had thought" suggests a single instance of thought that occurred before the job was found.



                        But many native speakers will not make these fine distinctions, and may use any of the four forms in the question interchangeably, with no difference of meaning.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                          2












                          2








                          2







                          All of these are perfectly acceptable. The forms using "had been thinking" suggest a process of thought which extended over some time, but ended, either when the job was found, or before that. The for with "had thought" suggests a single instance of thought that occurred before the job was found.



                          But many native speakers will not make these fine distinctions, and may use any of the four forms in the question interchangeably, with no difference of meaning.






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.










                          All of these are perfectly acceptable. The forms using "had been thinking" suggest a process of thought which extended over some time, but ended, either when the job was found, or before that. The for with "had thought" suggests a single instance of thought that occurred before the job was found.



                          But many native speakers will not make these fine distinctions, and may use any of the four forms in the question interchangeably, with no difference of meaning.







                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer






                          New contributor




                          David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          answered 1 hour ago









                          David SiegelDavid Siegel

                          3746




                          3746




                          New contributor




                          David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                          New contributor





                          David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          David Siegel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201024%2fusing-past-perfect-interchangeably-with-the-past-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                              Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

                              Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar