What is the plural TO / OF somethingexperience at/in/on high school levels“Not until” and “by”Write plural of/to the following wordsIs there any difference between “changing mind on something” and “changing mind about something”On the end of somethingwhen to use 'for' in this case?“do to” vs. “do with”“sort of” vs. “a sort of”In the field or on the field?Why is it 'a ticket _to_ the cinema' but 'a ticket _for_ a/the concert'?

Maths symbols and unicode-math input inside siunitx commands

Synchronized implementation of a bank account in Java

Worshiping one God at a time?

Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of fibres of Lipschitz maps

Probably overheated black color SMD pads

Constant Current LED Circuit

Fewest number of steps to reach 200 using special calculator

If "dar" means "to give", what does "daros" mean?

TikZ-decoration: control decoration amplitude along curve

What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?

What is the plural TO / OF something

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

Generic TVP tradeoffs?

Practical application of matrices and determinants

T-SQL LIKE Predicate failed to match with whitespace in XML converted varchar

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

In the 1924 version of The Thief of Bagdad, no character is named, right?

Brake pads destroying wheels

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Print last inputted byte

Dual Irish/Britsh citizens

Why does the degree of dissociation change when we dilute a weak acid even though the equilibrium constant K is constant?

How is the partial sum of a geometric sequence calculated?

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?



What is the plural TO / OF something


experience at/in/on high school levels“Not until” and “by”Write plural of/to the following wordsIs there any difference between “changing mind on something” and “changing mind about something”On the end of somethingwhen to use 'for' in this case?“do to” vs. “do with”“sort of” vs. “a sort of”In the field or on the field?Why is it 'a ticket _to_ the cinema' but 'a ticket _for_ a/the concert'?













3
















What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    7 hours ago















3
















What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    7 hours ago













3












3








3


1







What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?










share|improve this question

















What is the plural of boy?



What is the plural to boy?




Are they interchangeable?







prepositions grammaticality-in-context






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









jwodder

13714




13714










asked 12 hours ago









Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

373111




373111







  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    7 hours ago












  • 2





    Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

    – userr2684291
    7 hours ago







2




2





Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

– userr2684291
7 hours ago





Please don't use the backslash when listing alternatives; instead, use the forward slash (/).

– userr2684291
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















9














It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer























  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    12 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    11 hours ago


















2















"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    4 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    3 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    3 hours ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200923%2fwhat-is-the-plural-to-of-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9














It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer























  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    12 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    11 hours ago















9














It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer























  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    12 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    11 hours ago













9












9








9







It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?







share|improve this answer













It’s always the plural of something.




What is the plural of “boy”?



To make the plural of "dog" you add the plural ending -s.



“Are” is the second person plural of the verb “to be”.



The word “teeth” is an irregular plural of the noun “tooth”.



What's the plural of “tooth”?








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

1,628521




1,628521












  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    12 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    11 hours ago

















  • But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

    – Kumar sadhu
    12 hours ago







  • 4





    @Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

    – Chris Melville
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

    – amI
    11 hours ago
















But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

– Kumar sadhu
12 hours ago






But I have seen the sentence: "there is no singular to audience."

– Kumar sadhu
12 hours ago





4




4





@Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

– Chris Melville
11 hours ago





@Kumarsadhu - You may have seen this, but it’s incorrect. English has a very large number of speakers as a non-native language, and as such, mistakes are extremely common.

– Chris Melville
11 hours ago




4




4





@Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

– amI
11 hours ago





@Kumar sadhu- That is not normal English. You could get away with 'for', but 'of' is preferred.

– amI
11 hours ago













2















"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    4 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    3 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    3 hours ago















2















"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    4 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    3 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    3 hours ago













2












2








2








"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











"there is no singular to audience."




This is semantically incorrect - audience is a singular word, the plural of which is audiences - but syntactically, it's fine. If we instead pick a word like sheep, where the same word stands for one or many, then there is no plural to sheep is equally as correct as there is no plural of sheep.



The use of the different prepositions (of, to) gives different inflections to the adjective (singular). We can see this if we add explicit nouns:




There is no plural form of 'sheep'



There is no plural equivalent to 'sheep'




This holds while we are saying there is no.... In all the examples so far provided, we are making the adjectives plural or singular stand in for nouns. If we are asking about the existence of a plural, then form makes sense as the noun, but so might equivalent or aspect, both of which will be happy with a to.



In the examples provided by Andrew Tobilko, this would not hold. of is the only valid choice in those examples.



Generally, to can be used to relate qualities to objects. For example, it's natural and correct to say there is no flavour to this food - especially if you are a visitor to Britain.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 5 hours ago









FSCKurFSCKur

211




211




New contributor




FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






FSCKur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    4 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    3 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    3 hours ago












  • 1





    +1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

    – fred2
    4 hours ago











  • Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

    – amI
    3 hours ago











  • An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

    – FSCKur
    3 hours ago







1




1





+1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

– fred2
4 hours ago





+1 for the joke in the final paragraph.

– fred2
4 hours ago













Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

– amI
3 hours ago





Note that 'equivalent' is an adjective in a reduced relative phrase: "There is no plural [that is] equivalent to 'sheep'." If it was parsed as a noun (with 'plural' as adjective) then 'to' is just as clunky as "There is no plural to 'sheep'."

– amI
3 hours ago













An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

– FSCKur
3 hours ago





An excellent and germane clarification, thank you!

– FSCKur
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200923%2fwhat-is-the-plural-to-of-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar