A non-linear recurrence relation in two variablesCounting sequences - a recurrence relation.Solving a general two-term combinatorial recurrence relationDetermining a recurrence relationLinear Recurrence Relations in 2 Variables with Variable CoefficientsSolving a two dimensional non-homogenous linear recurrenceEliminating a variable from a two-variable linear recurrenceA two variable recurrence relation with conditionalsLinear two-dimensional recurrence relationCounting some binary trees with lots of extra stucturelinear recurrence relation for square of sequence given recursively

A non-linear recurrence relation in two variables


Counting sequences - a recurrence relation.Solving a general two-term combinatorial recurrence relationDetermining a recurrence relationLinear Recurrence Relations in 2 Variables with Variable CoefficientsSolving a two dimensional non-homogenous linear recurrenceEliminating a variable from a two-variable linear recurrenceA two variable recurrence relation with conditionalsLinear two-dimensional recurrence relationCounting some binary trees with lots of extra stucturelinear recurrence relation for square of sequence given recursively













1












$begingroup$


I'm interested in solving a particular non-linear recurrence in two variables:



$$lambda_j,k = (j+k) lambda_j,k-1 + beginpmatrix j+k \ 2 endpmatrix lambda_j-1, k-1.$$



Here $j geq -1$ and $k geq 0$, and we have initial conditions:



$lambda_-1,k = 0$ for all $k$;



$lambda_j,0 = 0$ for all $j>0$;



$lambda_0,0 = 1$.



This is a relation between the leading coefficients of certain polynomials occurring in a problem in modular invariant theory. $lambda_-1,k$ doesn't really make sense in context, but introducing it simplifies the relation and initial conditions nicely. Because of the context, I happen to know that for any prime $p$, $lambda_j,k neq 0$ mod $p$ unless $j+k geq p$. This suggests to me that there is a particularly simple solution, possibly a product of binomial coefficients.



Some starting points: Obviously $lambda_0,k = k!$ and it's easy to show that $lambda_j,k = 0$ if $j>k$ and $lambda_k,k = frac(2k)!2^k$ for $k geq 0$. I've tried solving it with generating functions in two variables, but that just produces a truly terrifying PDE of order 2 and degree 4.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Great answer @Fedor Petrov, thanks a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Elmer
    3 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


I'm interested in solving a particular non-linear recurrence in two variables:



$$lambda_j,k = (j+k) lambda_j,k-1 + beginpmatrix j+k \ 2 endpmatrix lambda_j-1, k-1.$$



Here $j geq -1$ and $k geq 0$, and we have initial conditions:



$lambda_-1,k = 0$ for all $k$;



$lambda_j,0 = 0$ for all $j>0$;



$lambda_0,0 = 1$.



This is a relation between the leading coefficients of certain polynomials occurring in a problem in modular invariant theory. $lambda_-1,k$ doesn't really make sense in context, but introducing it simplifies the relation and initial conditions nicely. Because of the context, I happen to know that for any prime $p$, $lambda_j,k neq 0$ mod $p$ unless $j+k geq p$. This suggests to me that there is a particularly simple solution, possibly a product of binomial coefficients.



Some starting points: Obviously $lambda_0,k = k!$ and it's easy to show that $lambda_j,k = 0$ if $j>k$ and $lambda_k,k = frac(2k)!2^k$ for $k geq 0$. I've tried solving it with generating functions in two variables, but that just produces a truly terrifying PDE of order 2 and degree 4.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Great answer @Fedor Petrov, thanks a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Elmer
    3 hours ago













1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


I'm interested in solving a particular non-linear recurrence in two variables:



$$lambda_j,k = (j+k) lambda_j,k-1 + beginpmatrix j+k \ 2 endpmatrix lambda_j-1, k-1.$$



Here $j geq -1$ and $k geq 0$, and we have initial conditions:



$lambda_-1,k = 0$ for all $k$;



$lambda_j,0 = 0$ for all $j>0$;



$lambda_0,0 = 1$.



This is a relation between the leading coefficients of certain polynomials occurring in a problem in modular invariant theory. $lambda_-1,k$ doesn't really make sense in context, but introducing it simplifies the relation and initial conditions nicely. Because of the context, I happen to know that for any prime $p$, $lambda_j,k neq 0$ mod $p$ unless $j+k geq p$. This suggests to me that there is a particularly simple solution, possibly a product of binomial coefficients.



Some starting points: Obviously $lambda_0,k = k!$ and it's easy to show that $lambda_j,k = 0$ if $j>k$ and $lambda_k,k = frac(2k)!2^k$ for $k geq 0$. I've tried solving it with generating functions in two variables, but that just produces a truly terrifying PDE of order 2 and degree 4.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm interested in solving a particular non-linear recurrence in two variables:



$$lambda_j,k = (j+k) lambda_j,k-1 + beginpmatrix j+k \ 2 endpmatrix lambda_j-1, k-1.$$



Here $j geq -1$ and $k geq 0$, and we have initial conditions:



$lambda_-1,k = 0$ for all $k$;



$lambda_j,0 = 0$ for all $j>0$;



$lambda_0,0 = 1$.



This is a relation between the leading coefficients of certain polynomials occurring in a problem in modular invariant theory. $lambda_-1,k$ doesn't really make sense in context, but introducing it simplifies the relation and initial conditions nicely. Because of the context, I happen to know that for any prime $p$, $lambda_j,k neq 0$ mod $p$ unless $j+k geq p$. This suggests to me that there is a particularly simple solution, possibly a product of binomial coefficients.



Some starting points: Obviously $lambda_0,k = k!$ and it's easy to show that $lambda_j,k = 0$ if $j>k$ and $lambda_k,k = frac(2k)!2^k$ for $k geq 0$. I've tried solving it with generating functions in two variables, but that just produces a truly terrifying PDE of order 2 and degree 4.







co.combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









Jon ElmerJon Elmer

233




233











  • $begingroup$
    Great answer @Fedor Petrov, thanks a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Elmer
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Great answer @Fedor Petrov, thanks a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Elmer
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
Great answer @Fedor Petrov, thanks a lot!
$endgroup$
– Jon Elmer
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Great answer @Fedor Petrov, thanks a lot!
$endgroup$
– Jon Elmer
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Denote $lambda_j,k=(j+k)! a_j,k$ (unless $j=-1,k=0$). Then we get $a_j,k=a_j,k-1+a_j-1,k-1/2$. Further denoting $a_j,k=2^-jb_j,k$ we get $b_j,k=b_j,k-1+b_j-1,k-1$ that looks like a Pascal triangle recurrence. So $b_j,k=binomkj$ (check the initial conditions also) and $lambda_j,k=2^-j(j+k)!binomkj$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327032%2fa-non-linear-recurrence-relation-in-two-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    Denote $lambda_j,k=(j+k)! a_j,k$ (unless $j=-1,k=0$). Then we get $a_j,k=a_j,k-1+a_j-1,k-1/2$. Further denoting $a_j,k=2^-jb_j,k$ we get $b_j,k=b_j,k-1+b_j-1,k-1$ that looks like a Pascal triangle recurrence. So $b_j,k=binomkj$ (check the initial conditions also) and $lambda_j,k=2^-j(j+k)!binomkj$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      Denote $lambda_j,k=(j+k)! a_j,k$ (unless $j=-1,k=0$). Then we get $a_j,k=a_j,k-1+a_j-1,k-1/2$. Further denoting $a_j,k=2^-jb_j,k$ we get $b_j,k=b_j,k-1+b_j-1,k-1$ that looks like a Pascal triangle recurrence. So $b_j,k=binomkj$ (check the initial conditions also) and $lambda_j,k=2^-j(j+k)!binomkj$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Denote $lambda_j,k=(j+k)! a_j,k$ (unless $j=-1,k=0$). Then we get $a_j,k=a_j,k-1+a_j-1,k-1/2$. Further denoting $a_j,k=2^-jb_j,k$ we get $b_j,k=b_j,k-1+b_j-1,k-1$ that looks like a Pascal triangle recurrence. So $b_j,k=binomkj$ (check the initial conditions also) and $lambda_j,k=2^-j(j+k)!binomkj$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Denote $lambda_j,k=(j+k)! a_j,k$ (unless $j=-1,k=0$). Then we get $a_j,k=a_j,k-1+a_j-1,k-1/2$. Further denoting $a_j,k=2^-jb_j,k$ we get $b_j,k=b_j,k-1+b_j-1,k-1$ that looks like a Pascal triangle recurrence. So $b_j,k=binomkj$ (check the initial conditions also) and $lambda_j,k=2^-j(j+k)!binomkj$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Fedor PetrovFedor Petrov

        51.6k6121238




        51.6k6121238



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327032%2fa-non-linear-recurrence-relation-in-two-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

            格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订

            聖斯德望教堂 (塞克什白堡) 參考資料 导航菜单