Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?Can't observe DC offset in a simple RC circuit with an oscilloscopeWhy I cannot see SPI signal properly with oscilloscope?See if signal is amplified without an oscilloscopeTiming diagram of circuit involving switch debouncingMy “audio oscilloscope” can't measure static/constant voltages but only changesHow to add bouncing to a switch in LTspice?Oscilloscope saving data unexpectedlyWhy do I see multiple waveforms on my oscilloscope in normal trigger mode?Bouncing at some points in square waveFrequency of contact bouncing
meaning of に in 本当に?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply
RSA: Danger of using p to create q
Modeling an IP Address
DC-DC converter from low voltage at high current, to high voltage at low current
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?
Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?
Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?
How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?
Java Casting: Java 11 throws LambdaConversionException while 1.8 does not
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX
Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?
Why can't we play rap on piano?
Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file
Theorems that impeded progress
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?
Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?
Add text to same line using sed
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
Can't observe DC offset in a simple RC circuit with an oscilloscopeWhy I cannot see SPI signal properly with oscilloscope?See if signal is amplified without an oscilloscopeTiming diagram of circuit involving switch debouncingMy “audio oscilloscope” can't measure static/constant voltages but only changesHow to add bouncing to a switch in LTspice?Oscilloscope saving data unexpectedlyWhy do I see multiple waveforms on my oscilloscope in normal trigger mode?Bouncing at some points in square waveFrequency of contact bouncing
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm trying to view the bouncing of a simple switch on an oscilloscope.
I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as a perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of the scope screen and the circuit.
Please help me understand why I can't catch the bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: Here is a photo showing a zoomed-in time scale (50us/div). As you can see it is rising from 0V to 9V within 150us and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. The resistor in the picture is 220-Ohm, 0.5-Watt.
switches oscilloscope debounce
New contributor
$endgroup$
|
show 16 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm trying to view the bouncing of a simple switch on an oscilloscope.
I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as a perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of the scope screen and the circuit.
Please help me understand why I can't catch the bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: Here is a photo showing a zoomed-in time scale (50us/div). As you can see it is rising from 0V to 9V within 150us and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. The resistor in the picture is 220-Ohm, 0.5-Watt.
switches oscilloscope debounce
New contributor
$endgroup$
9
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
7 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Deniz Set the time base reasonably fast (maybe 1ms), the scope trigger to "single" and "rising edge", then press the button. That should be OK. You might also want to look at the display settings, and either change the points to just show dots for each point, or to step to each point (giving a ”staircase" effect). That'll stop you getting fooled when you zoom in too far.
$endgroup$
– Graham
5 hours ago
|
show 16 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm trying to view the bouncing of a simple switch on an oscilloscope.
I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as a perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of the scope screen and the circuit.
Please help me understand why I can't catch the bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: Here is a photo showing a zoomed-in time scale (50us/div). As you can see it is rising from 0V to 9V within 150us and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. The resistor in the picture is 220-Ohm, 0.5-Watt.
switches oscilloscope debounce
New contributor
$endgroup$
I'm trying to view the bouncing of a simple switch on an oscilloscope.
I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as a perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of the scope screen and the circuit.
Please help me understand why I can't catch the bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: Here is a photo showing a zoomed-in time scale (50us/div). As you can see it is rising from 0V to 9V within 150us and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. The resistor in the picture is 220-Ohm, 0.5-Watt.
switches oscilloscope debounce
switches oscilloscope debounce
New contributor
New contributor
edited 43 mins ago
bitsmack
11.9k73677
11.9k73677
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
DenizDeniz
1363
1363
New contributor
New contributor
9
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
7 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Deniz Set the time base reasonably fast (maybe 1ms), the scope trigger to "single" and "rising edge", then press the button. That should be OK. You might also want to look at the display settings, and either change the points to just show dots for each point, or to step to each point (giving a ”staircase" effect). That'll stop you getting fooled when you zoom in too far.
$endgroup$
– Graham
5 hours ago
|
show 16 more comments
9
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
7 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Deniz Set the time base reasonably fast (maybe 1ms), the scope trigger to "single" and "rising edge", then press the button. That should be OK. You might also want to look at the display settings, and either change the points to just show dots for each point, or to step to each point (giving a ”staircase" effect). That'll stop you getting fooled when you zoom in too far.
$endgroup$
– Graham
5 hours ago
9
9
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
7 hours ago
8
8
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Deniz Set the time base reasonably fast (maybe 1ms), the scope trigger to "single" and "rising edge", then press the button. That should be OK. You might also want to look at the display settings, and either change the points to just show dots for each point, or to step to each point (giving a ”staircase" effect). That'll stop you getting fooled when you zoom in too far.
$endgroup$
– Graham
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz Set the time base reasonably fast (maybe 1ms), the scope trigger to "single" and "rising edge", then press the button. That should be OK. You might also want to look at the display settings, and either change the points to just show dots for each point, or to step to each point (giving a ”staircase" effect). That'll stop you getting fooled when you zoom in too far.
$endgroup$
– Graham
5 hours ago
|
show 16 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Deniz To convince oneself, switch the scope display mode to points if possible
$endgroup$
– crasic
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is an issue with scope setup and misunderstanding of how to interpret scope captures. You must capture the rising edge of a single pulse at a reasonably small resolution by using a single trigger. Good news is that this is exactly what oscilloscopes are designed to do
The generic procedure is:
- Set trigger to edge (up) and trigger level at Approximately half scale of your button voltage
- (Optional) Move the trigger (horizontal) offset to the left hand of screen to maximize the portion of capture after trigger
- Switch trigger to "normal" and "single mode" to arm the trigger for a single capture
- Press your button
- If you use continuous trigger you will get a new capture with every button press
- If you don't use normal mode you may lose the captured signal due to preview refresh (typically triggered at 60hz to have a simulated "live signal" mode) , "single-normal" mode freezes the scope after capture
Most Digital capture scopes record a fixed number of points at all time base so the sample rate is determined by a combination of time base and capture depth (which may be configured) and limited by the maximum sampling rate. On my Tek the scope displays both the time per div and effective sample rate
What is displayed may also be "windowed" depending on mode so it may not always be clear what your sample rate actually is. For example 100K pts into 1s timebase with 10 divisions on screen would be 10ksps. 100k pts into 10us timebase with 10divisions on screen would be 1gsps, typically this is near the limit for common digital scopes so time bases below 10us are often "zoomed in" divisions at 10us (e.g. 100k pts into 10divisions at 10us, but display one division with 1us time base on screen)
Also note that analog bandwith (e..g "100Mhz ") does not directly related to the digital sample rate.
An additional quirk, triggering is not done on the (digital) sampled signal, but directly on the input through a dedicated trigger system. What this means is that you can trigger (sometimes) on a pulse that is too short to be resolved in the digital signal. Or you can add a trigger delay much much longer than the sample depth (e..g display the capture at 10us resolution but 1second after trigger) . This is also why there is often an "aux" or "external trigger" port that can be used to trigger but never displayed or captured
The scope is effectively sampling continuously into a ring buffer and the trigger comes along and tells the sampling systems to store the buffer. This is a large amount of data so it requires some time to store the data and to rearm the sample system. The electronics and suitable memory to process a gigabit stream continuously is very expensive so scopes are designed to make use of limited storage depth and digital bandwidth through triggering schemes
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1! Much more informative than my answer :)
$endgroup$
– bitsmack
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming that the pull-down resistor is a reasonable value (1k - 10k), the very next thing that I would check is to see if there is a filter active on that channel. I wouldn't be looking for signal averaging - this is a single-event occurrence and the trace shows that single event. But it is entirely possible that there is a very-low frequency low-pass filter that is turned ON in the scope.
Another way to find out if it is a scope problem is to simply plug a pair of wires into the busses for the switch contacts. Then brush the two switch wires together and look at the noise (or lack thereof). Noise means scope is probably okay. Smooth ramp says that the scope isn't displaying the full bandwidth of the input signal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
use an old switch or store your new switch in a mixture of salt water and vinegar for a few hours, that will corrode the contacts and increase the bounce
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why would it bounce upon switching? Have u any L or C in your circuit that would cause damping, or say bouncing? No bouncing in pure resistive circuits when switched on.
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of switches
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have gone thru the answers mentioned above.
But First, please change your oscilloscope.
The scope you are using would have a shallow memory.(Acquisition Memory ...may be 1K or a few K memory).
Try with Deep Memory Scopes.Tektronix TDS 3000 or 4000 series , Keysight DSOx 3000 to 6000 series or many more brands and models are available.
You will definitely get a beautiful contact bounce ringing at the top the vertical rising/ falling edges.
The number of ringing edges is proportional to the length of your grounding wire length.Less the length, less ringing.The more the length, more ringing.
The Deep Memory scopes will contain record length or Acquisition memory in terms of Mb ....say 2Mb , 4Mb, 8Mb etc......Don't worry about Sampling rates. Deep memory will control to sustain the sampling rate.
I have captured enough time these switching circuits,in Deep memory scopes.
Try ...
Best Regards
A Senthil
New contributor
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
The instrument in use is orders or magnitude more than sufficient if used properly. Recommending the purchase of new gear over learning to use the ordinary and suitable gear at hand is the mark of those who do not know what they are doing. There exists a capture rate, within the capability of that scope where the bouncing of the actual contacts is easily represented on the screen alone, nevermind any off-screen memory.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430983%2fwhy-cant-i-see-bouncing-of-a-switch-on-an-oscilloscope%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Deniz To convince oneself, switch the scope display mode to points if possible
$endgroup$
– crasic
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Deniz To convince oneself, switch the scope display mode to points if possible
$endgroup$
– crasic
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
$endgroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
11.9k73677
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Deniz To convince oneself, switch the scope display mode to points if possible
$endgroup$
– crasic
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
6 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Deniz To convince oneself, switch the scope display mode to points if possible
$endgroup$
– crasic
27 mins ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
7
7
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
6 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Deniz To convince oneself, switch the scope display mode to points if possible
$endgroup$
– crasic
27 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz To convince oneself, switch the scope display mode to points if possible
$endgroup$
– crasic
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is an issue with scope setup and misunderstanding of how to interpret scope captures. You must capture the rising edge of a single pulse at a reasonably small resolution by using a single trigger. Good news is that this is exactly what oscilloscopes are designed to do
The generic procedure is:
- Set trigger to edge (up) and trigger level at Approximately half scale of your button voltage
- (Optional) Move the trigger (horizontal) offset to the left hand of screen to maximize the portion of capture after trigger
- Switch trigger to "normal" and "single mode" to arm the trigger for a single capture
- Press your button
- If you use continuous trigger you will get a new capture with every button press
- If you don't use normal mode you may lose the captured signal due to preview refresh (typically triggered at 60hz to have a simulated "live signal" mode) , "single-normal" mode freezes the scope after capture
Most Digital capture scopes record a fixed number of points at all time base so the sample rate is determined by a combination of time base and capture depth (which may be configured) and limited by the maximum sampling rate. On my Tek the scope displays both the time per div and effective sample rate
What is displayed may also be "windowed" depending on mode so it may not always be clear what your sample rate actually is. For example 100K pts into 1s timebase with 10 divisions on screen would be 10ksps. 100k pts into 10us timebase with 10divisions on screen would be 1gsps, typically this is near the limit for common digital scopes so time bases below 10us are often "zoomed in" divisions at 10us (e.g. 100k pts into 10divisions at 10us, but display one division with 1us time base on screen)
Also note that analog bandwith (e..g "100Mhz ") does not directly related to the digital sample rate.
An additional quirk, triggering is not done on the (digital) sampled signal, but directly on the input through a dedicated trigger system. What this means is that you can trigger (sometimes) on a pulse that is too short to be resolved in the digital signal. Or you can add a trigger delay much much longer than the sample depth (e..g display the capture at 10us resolution but 1second after trigger) . This is also why there is often an "aux" or "external trigger" port that can be used to trigger but never displayed or captured
The scope is effectively sampling continuously into a ring buffer and the trigger comes along and tells the sampling systems to store the buffer. This is a large amount of data so it requires some time to store the data and to rearm the sample system. The electronics and suitable memory to process a gigabit stream continuously is very expensive so scopes are designed to make use of limited storage depth and digital bandwidth through triggering schemes
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1! Much more informative than my answer :)
$endgroup$
– bitsmack
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is an issue with scope setup and misunderstanding of how to interpret scope captures. You must capture the rising edge of a single pulse at a reasonably small resolution by using a single trigger. Good news is that this is exactly what oscilloscopes are designed to do
The generic procedure is:
- Set trigger to edge (up) and trigger level at Approximately half scale of your button voltage
- (Optional) Move the trigger (horizontal) offset to the left hand of screen to maximize the portion of capture after trigger
- Switch trigger to "normal" and "single mode" to arm the trigger for a single capture
- Press your button
- If you use continuous trigger you will get a new capture with every button press
- If you don't use normal mode you may lose the captured signal due to preview refresh (typically triggered at 60hz to have a simulated "live signal" mode) , "single-normal" mode freezes the scope after capture
Most Digital capture scopes record a fixed number of points at all time base so the sample rate is determined by a combination of time base and capture depth (which may be configured) and limited by the maximum sampling rate. On my Tek the scope displays both the time per div and effective sample rate
What is displayed may also be "windowed" depending on mode so it may not always be clear what your sample rate actually is. For example 100K pts into 1s timebase with 10 divisions on screen would be 10ksps. 100k pts into 10us timebase with 10divisions on screen would be 1gsps, typically this is near the limit for common digital scopes so time bases below 10us are often "zoomed in" divisions at 10us (e.g. 100k pts into 10divisions at 10us, but display one division with 1us time base on screen)
Also note that analog bandwith (e..g "100Mhz ") does not directly related to the digital sample rate.
An additional quirk, triggering is not done on the (digital) sampled signal, but directly on the input through a dedicated trigger system. What this means is that you can trigger (sometimes) on a pulse that is too short to be resolved in the digital signal. Or you can add a trigger delay much much longer than the sample depth (e..g display the capture at 10us resolution but 1second after trigger) . This is also why there is often an "aux" or "external trigger" port that can be used to trigger but never displayed or captured
The scope is effectively sampling continuously into a ring buffer and the trigger comes along and tells the sampling systems to store the buffer. This is a large amount of data so it requires some time to store the data and to rearm the sample system. The electronics and suitable memory to process a gigabit stream continuously is very expensive so scopes are designed to make use of limited storage depth and digital bandwidth through triggering schemes
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1! Much more informative than my answer :)
$endgroup$
– bitsmack
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is an issue with scope setup and misunderstanding of how to interpret scope captures. You must capture the rising edge of a single pulse at a reasonably small resolution by using a single trigger. Good news is that this is exactly what oscilloscopes are designed to do
The generic procedure is:
- Set trigger to edge (up) and trigger level at Approximately half scale of your button voltage
- (Optional) Move the trigger (horizontal) offset to the left hand of screen to maximize the portion of capture after trigger
- Switch trigger to "normal" and "single mode" to arm the trigger for a single capture
- Press your button
- If you use continuous trigger you will get a new capture with every button press
- If you don't use normal mode you may lose the captured signal due to preview refresh (typically triggered at 60hz to have a simulated "live signal" mode) , "single-normal" mode freezes the scope after capture
Most Digital capture scopes record a fixed number of points at all time base so the sample rate is determined by a combination of time base and capture depth (which may be configured) and limited by the maximum sampling rate. On my Tek the scope displays both the time per div and effective sample rate
What is displayed may also be "windowed" depending on mode so it may not always be clear what your sample rate actually is. For example 100K pts into 1s timebase with 10 divisions on screen would be 10ksps. 100k pts into 10us timebase with 10divisions on screen would be 1gsps, typically this is near the limit for common digital scopes so time bases below 10us are often "zoomed in" divisions at 10us (e.g. 100k pts into 10divisions at 10us, but display one division with 1us time base on screen)
Also note that analog bandwith (e..g "100Mhz ") does not directly related to the digital sample rate.
An additional quirk, triggering is not done on the (digital) sampled signal, but directly on the input through a dedicated trigger system. What this means is that you can trigger (sometimes) on a pulse that is too short to be resolved in the digital signal. Or you can add a trigger delay much much longer than the sample depth (e..g display the capture at 10us resolution but 1second after trigger) . This is also why there is often an "aux" or "external trigger" port that can be used to trigger but never displayed or captured
The scope is effectively sampling continuously into a ring buffer and the trigger comes along and tells the sampling systems to store the buffer. This is a large amount of data so it requires some time to store the data and to rearm the sample system. The electronics and suitable memory to process a gigabit stream continuously is very expensive so scopes are designed to make use of limited storage depth and digital bandwidth through triggering schemes
$endgroup$
This is an issue with scope setup and misunderstanding of how to interpret scope captures. You must capture the rising edge of a single pulse at a reasonably small resolution by using a single trigger. Good news is that this is exactly what oscilloscopes are designed to do
The generic procedure is:
- Set trigger to edge (up) and trigger level at Approximately half scale of your button voltage
- (Optional) Move the trigger (horizontal) offset to the left hand of screen to maximize the portion of capture after trigger
- Switch trigger to "normal" and "single mode" to arm the trigger for a single capture
- Press your button
- If you use continuous trigger you will get a new capture with every button press
- If you don't use normal mode you may lose the captured signal due to preview refresh (typically triggered at 60hz to have a simulated "live signal" mode) , "single-normal" mode freezes the scope after capture
Most Digital capture scopes record a fixed number of points at all time base so the sample rate is determined by a combination of time base and capture depth (which may be configured) and limited by the maximum sampling rate. On my Tek the scope displays both the time per div and effective sample rate
What is displayed may also be "windowed" depending on mode so it may not always be clear what your sample rate actually is. For example 100K pts into 1s timebase with 10 divisions on screen would be 10ksps. 100k pts into 10us timebase with 10divisions on screen would be 1gsps, typically this is near the limit for common digital scopes so time bases below 10us are often "zoomed in" divisions at 10us (e.g. 100k pts into 10divisions at 10us, but display one division with 1us time base on screen)
Also note that analog bandwith (e..g "100Mhz ") does not directly related to the digital sample rate.
An additional quirk, triggering is not done on the (digital) sampled signal, but directly on the input through a dedicated trigger system. What this means is that you can trigger (sometimes) on a pulse that is too short to be resolved in the digital signal. Or you can add a trigger delay much much longer than the sample depth (e..g display the capture at 10us resolution but 1second after trigger) . This is also why there is often an "aux" or "external trigger" port that can be used to trigger but never displayed or captured
The scope is effectively sampling continuously into a ring buffer and the trigger comes along and tells the sampling systems to store the buffer. This is a large amount of data so it requires some time to store the data and to rearm the sample system. The electronics and suitable memory to process a gigabit stream continuously is very expensive so scopes are designed to make use of limited storage depth and digital bandwidth through triggering schemes
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
crasiccrasic
3,084926
3,084926
$begingroup$
+1! Much more informative than my answer :)
$endgroup$
– bitsmack
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
+1! Much more informative than my answer :)
$endgroup$
– bitsmack
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
+1! Much more informative than my answer :)
$endgroup$
– bitsmack
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
+1! Much more informative than my answer :)
$endgroup$
– bitsmack
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming that the pull-down resistor is a reasonable value (1k - 10k), the very next thing that I would check is to see if there is a filter active on that channel. I wouldn't be looking for signal averaging - this is a single-event occurrence and the trace shows that single event. But it is entirely possible that there is a very-low frequency low-pass filter that is turned ON in the scope.
Another way to find out if it is a scope problem is to simply plug a pair of wires into the busses for the switch contacts. Then brush the two switch wires together and look at the noise (or lack thereof). Noise means scope is probably okay. Smooth ramp says that the scope isn't displaying the full bandwidth of the input signal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming that the pull-down resistor is a reasonable value (1k - 10k), the very next thing that I would check is to see if there is a filter active on that channel. I wouldn't be looking for signal averaging - this is a single-event occurrence and the trace shows that single event. But it is entirely possible that there is a very-low frequency low-pass filter that is turned ON in the scope.
Another way to find out if it is a scope problem is to simply plug a pair of wires into the busses for the switch contacts. Then brush the two switch wires together and look at the noise (or lack thereof). Noise means scope is probably okay. Smooth ramp says that the scope isn't displaying the full bandwidth of the input signal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming that the pull-down resistor is a reasonable value (1k - 10k), the very next thing that I would check is to see if there is a filter active on that channel. I wouldn't be looking for signal averaging - this is a single-event occurrence and the trace shows that single event. But it is entirely possible that there is a very-low frequency low-pass filter that is turned ON in the scope.
Another way to find out if it is a scope problem is to simply plug a pair of wires into the busses for the switch contacts. Then brush the two switch wires together and look at the noise (or lack thereof). Noise means scope is probably okay. Smooth ramp says that the scope isn't displaying the full bandwidth of the input signal.
$endgroup$
Assuming that the pull-down resistor is a reasonable value (1k - 10k), the very next thing that I would check is to see if there is a filter active on that channel. I wouldn't be looking for signal averaging - this is a single-event occurrence and the trace shows that single event. But it is entirely possible that there is a very-low frequency low-pass filter that is turned ON in the scope.
Another way to find out if it is a scope problem is to simply plug a pair of wires into the busses for the switch contacts. Then brush the two switch wires together and look at the noise (or lack thereof). Noise means scope is probably okay. Smooth ramp says that the scope isn't displaying the full bandwidth of the input signal.
answered 3 hours ago
Dwayne ReidDwayne Reid
18.2k21949
18.2k21949
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
$endgroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
answered 7 hours ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
88.2k785189
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
use an old switch or store your new switch in a mixture of salt water and vinegar for a few hours, that will corrode the contacts and increase the bounce
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
use an old switch or store your new switch in a mixture of salt water and vinegar for a few hours, that will corrode the contacts and increase the bounce
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
use an old switch or store your new switch in a mixture of salt water and vinegar for a few hours, that will corrode the contacts and increase the bounce
New contributor
$endgroup$
use an old switch or store your new switch in a mixture of salt water and vinegar for a few hours, that will corrode the contacts and increase the bounce
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
ronron
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why would it bounce upon switching? Have u any L or C in your circuit that would cause damping, or say bouncing? No bouncing in pure resistive circuits when switched on.
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of switches
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why would it bounce upon switching? Have u any L or C in your circuit that would cause damping, or say bouncing? No bouncing in pure resistive circuits when switched on.
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of switches
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why would it bounce upon switching? Have u any L or C in your circuit that would cause damping, or say bouncing? No bouncing in pure resistive circuits when switched on.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Why would it bounce upon switching? Have u any L or C in your circuit that would cause damping, or say bouncing? No bouncing in pure resistive circuits when switched on.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
HAMOOD UR REHMANHAMOOD UR REHMAN
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
3
$begingroup$
This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of switches
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of switches
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
3
3
$begingroup$
This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of switches
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of switches
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have gone thru the answers mentioned above.
But First, please change your oscilloscope.
The scope you are using would have a shallow memory.(Acquisition Memory ...may be 1K or a few K memory).
Try with Deep Memory Scopes.Tektronix TDS 3000 or 4000 series , Keysight DSOx 3000 to 6000 series or many more brands and models are available.
You will definitely get a beautiful contact bounce ringing at the top the vertical rising/ falling edges.
The number of ringing edges is proportional to the length of your grounding wire length.Less the length, less ringing.The more the length, more ringing.
The Deep Memory scopes will contain record length or Acquisition memory in terms of Mb ....say 2Mb , 4Mb, 8Mb etc......Don't worry about Sampling rates. Deep memory will control to sustain the sampling rate.
I have captured enough time these switching circuits,in Deep memory scopes.
Try ...
Best Regards
A Senthil
New contributor
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
The instrument in use is orders or magnitude more than sufficient if used properly. Recommending the purchase of new gear over learning to use the ordinary and suitable gear at hand is the mark of those who do not know what they are doing. There exists a capture rate, within the capability of that scope where the bouncing of the actual contacts is easily represented on the screen alone, nevermind any off-screen memory.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have gone thru the answers mentioned above.
But First, please change your oscilloscope.
The scope you are using would have a shallow memory.(Acquisition Memory ...may be 1K or a few K memory).
Try with Deep Memory Scopes.Tektronix TDS 3000 or 4000 series , Keysight DSOx 3000 to 6000 series or many more brands and models are available.
You will definitely get a beautiful contact bounce ringing at the top the vertical rising/ falling edges.
The number of ringing edges is proportional to the length of your grounding wire length.Less the length, less ringing.The more the length, more ringing.
The Deep Memory scopes will contain record length or Acquisition memory in terms of Mb ....say 2Mb , 4Mb, 8Mb etc......Don't worry about Sampling rates. Deep memory will control to sustain the sampling rate.
I have captured enough time these switching circuits,in Deep memory scopes.
Try ...
Best Regards
A Senthil
New contributor
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
The instrument in use is orders or magnitude more than sufficient if used properly. Recommending the purchase of new gear over learning to use the ordinary and suitable gear at hand is the mark of those who do not know what they are doing. There exists a capture rate, within the capability of that scope where the bouncing of the actual contacts is easily represented on the screen alone, nevermind any off-screen memory.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have gone thru the answers mentioned above.
But First, please change your oscilloscope.
The scope you are using would have a shallow memory.(Acquisition Memory ...may be 1K or a few K memory).
Try with Deep Memory Scopes.Tektronix TDS 3000 or 4000 series , Keysight DSOx 3000 to 6000 series or many more brands and models are available.
You will definitely get a beautiful contact bounce ringing at the top the vertical rising/ falling edges.
The number of ringing edges is proportional to the length of your grounding wire length.Less the length, less ringing.The more the length, more ringing.
The Deep Memory scopes will contain record length or Acquisition memory in terms of Mb ....say 2Mb , 4Mb, 8Mb etc......Don't worry about Sampling rates. Deep memory will control to sustain the sampling rate.
I have captured enough time these switching circuits,in Deep memory scopes.
Try ...
Best Regards
A Senthil
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have gone thru the answers mentioned above.
But First, please change your oscilloscope.
The scope you are using would have a shallow memory.(Acquisition Memory ...may be 1K or a few K memory).
Try with Deep Memory Scopes.Tektronix TDS 3000 or 4000 series , Keysight DSOx 3000 to 6000 series or many more brands and models are available.
You will definitely get a beautiful contact bounce ringing at the top the vertical rising/ falling edges.
The number of ringing edges is proportional to the length of your grounding wire length.Less the length, less ringing.The more the length, more ringing.
The Deep Memory scopes will contain record length or Acquisition memory in terms of Mb ....say 2Mb , 4Mb, 8Mb etc......Don't worry about Sampling rates. Deep memory will control to sustain the sampling rate.
I have captured enough time these switching circuits,in Deep memory scopes.
Try ...
Best Regards
A Senthil
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
A SenthilA Senthil
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
8
$begingroup$
The instrument in use is orders or magnitude more than sufficient if used properly. Recommending the purchase of new gear over learning to use the ordinary and suitable gear at hand is the mark of those who do not know what they are doing. There exists a capture rate, within the capability of that scope where the bouncing of the actual contacts is easily represented on the screen alone, nevermind any off-screen memory.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
8
$begingroup$
The instrument in use is orders or magnitude more than sufficient if used properly. Recommending the purchase of new gear over learning to use the ordinary and suitable gear at hand is the mark of those who do not know what they are doing. There exists a capture rate, within the capability of that scope where the bouncing of the actual contacts is easily represented on the screen alone, nevermind any off-screen memory.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
8
8
$begingroup$
The instrument in use is orders or magnitude more than sufficient if used properly. Recommending the purchase of new gear over learning to use the ordinary and suitable gear at hand is the mark of those who do not know what they are doing. There exists a capture rate, within the capability of that scope where the bouncing of the actual contacts is easily represented on the screen alone, nevermind any off-screen memory.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The instrument in use is orders or magnitude more than sufficient if used properly. Recommending the purchase of new gear over learning to use the ordinary and suitable gear at hand is the mark of those who do not know what they are doing. There exists a capture rate, within the capability of that scope where the bouncing of the actual contacts is easily represented on the screen alone, nevermind any off-screen memory.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430983%2fwhy-cant-i-see-bouncing-of-a-switch-on-an-oscilloscope%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
9
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
7 hours ago
8
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Deniz Set the time base reasonably fast (maybe 1ms), the scope trigger to "single" and "rising edge", then press the button. That should be OK. You might also want to look at the display settings, and either change the points to just show dots for each point, or to step to each point (giving a ”staircase" effect). That'll stop you getting fooled when you zoom in too far.
$endgroup$
– Graham
5 hours ago