Is oxalic acid dihydrate considered a primary acid standard in analytical chemistry?How to standardise NaOH?What are the limits of analytical chemistry?Oxalic acid structureHow to determine amount of CO₂ in soda waterDefinition of major, minor, and trace elements in analytical chemistryHow do I calculate the concentration of sulphuric acid by a titration experiment with sodium hydroxide?Analytical Chemistry Textbook RecommendationConcentrating Oxalic Acid by Evaporationanalytical chemistry standard deviationWhat primary standard acid can be used to standardise NaOH solutions by titration?Calculation of composition of drain cleaner

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

How can I kill an app using Terminal?

What is the best translation for "slot" in the context of multiplayer video games?

Pre-amplifier input protection

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers

Method to test if a number is a perfect power?

A particular customize with green line and letters for subfloat

Integer addition + constant, is it a group?

Do sorcerers' Subtle Spells require a skill check to be unseen?

Sequence of Tenses: Translating the subjunctive

What is paid subscription needed for in Mortal Kombat 11?

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle

Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?

Is expanding the research of a group into machine learning as a PhD student risky?

Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

India just shot down a satellite from the ground. At what altitude range is the resulting debris field?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Is `x >> pure y` equivalent to `liftM (const y) x`

Did the DC-9 ever use RATO in revenue service?



Is oxalic acid dihydrate considered a primary acid standard in analytical chemistry?


How to standardise NaOH?What are the limits of analytical chemistry?Oxalic acid structureHow to determine amount of CO₂ in soda waterDefinition of major, minor, and trace elements in analytical chemistryHow do I calculate the concentration of sulphuric acid by a titration experiment with sodium hydroxide?Analytical Chemistry Textbook RecommendationConcentrating Oxalic Acid by Evaporationanalytical chemistry standard deviationWhat primary standard acid can be used to standardise NaOH solutions by titration?Calculation of composition of drain cleaner













5












$begingroup$


Using oxalic acid dihydrate as a primary standard just seems really odd to me. I'd expect a primary standard to be oven dried. It just seems weird that a hydrate would be used.



Granted, I saw numerous references to using oxalic acid dihydrate on the web to standardize $ceNaOH$. I assume that for high school and freshman labs that it is "good enough." Using student grade burettes and open air pan balances would greatly limit the possible precision.



Also I'd guess that "good enough purity" oxalic acid dihydrate can be purchased much more cheaply than potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP), which would be my choice.




The analytical method as I remember from nearly 50 years ago...



Prepare a concentrated stock solution (4 molar?) of $ceNaOH$ using distilled water. That went in a jug with a spout just above the bottom. It was capped with a dedicator tube filled with $ceNaOH$ to absorb $ceCO2$ from the atmosphere. It sat for a couple of days to allow sodium carbonate to settle out. ($ceNaOH$ will have some carbonate.)



Dried KHP in an oven at $pu120 ^circC$ for four hours and then put that in a desiccator to cool.



Boiled distilled water to remove dissolved $ceCO2$ and stoppered that to cool.



Using the cooled boiled distilled water made an approximately $pu0.1 M$ solution of $ceNaOH$ by diluting the concentrated stock solution.



Using an analytical balance, weigh out 3 samples of KHP to nearest $pu0.0001 g$ into flasks and carefully dissolved the KHP in the cooled boiled distilled water with swirling to minimize introducing bubbles into the solution.



Then using $ceNaOH$ as the titrant, phenolphthalein was used as the indicator. Again careful to swirl solution, not shake, to prevent bubbles.



Using class 1 50-mL burette which was marked to $pu0.1 mL$s but read to $pu0.01 mL$.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Note that it is used also as a standard in manganometry.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Having one chemical that can be used in multiple ways would be good for cutting costs. But I'd expect that sodium oxalate would be a better redox standard than oxalic acid dihydrate.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps sodium oxalate, yes. Btw, we had at high school analytical scales with 0.1 mg resolution, with putting a wire on the scale shoulders, reading the pointer on enlighten scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    DAB (Deutsches Arzneibuch) lists a total of eight "Urtitersubstanzen" (= recommended primary standards), plus a dozen more which I might (for lack of a better word) call subprime standards. KHP is among the former, oxalic acid the latter.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$


Using oxalic acid dihydrate as a primary standard just seems really odd to me. I'd expect a primary standard to be oven dried. It just seems weird that a hydrate would be used.



Granted, I saw numerous references to using oxalic acid dihydrate on the web to standardize $ceNaOH$. I assume that for high school and freshman labs that it is "good enough." Using student grade burettes and open air pan balances would greatly limit the possible precision.



Also I'd guess that "good enough purity" oxalic acid dihydrate can be purchased much more cheaply than potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP), which would be my choice.




The analytical method as I remember from nearly 50 years ago...



Prepare a concentrated stock solution (4 molar?) of $ceNaOH$ using distilled water. That went in a jug with a spout just above the bottom. It was capped with a dedicator tube filled with $ceNaOH$ to absorb $ceCO2$ from the atmosphere. It sat for a couple of days to allow sodium carbonate to settle out. ($ceNaOH$ will have some carbonate.)



Dried KHP in an oven at $pu120 ^circC$ for four hours and then put that in a desiccator to cool.



Boiled distilled water to remove dissolved $ceCO2$ and stoppered that to cool.



Using the cooled boiled distilled water made an approximately $pu0.1 M$ solution of $ceNaOH$ by diluting the concentrated stock solution.



Using an analytical balance, weigh out 3 samples of KHP to nearest $pu0.0001 g$ into flasks and carefully dissolved the KHP in the cooled boiled distilled water with swirling to minimize introducing bubbles into the solution.



Then using $ceNaOH$ as the titrant, phenolphthalein was used as the indicator. Again careful to swirl solution, not shake, to prevent bubbles.



Using class 1 50-mL burette which was marked to $pu0.1 mL$s but read to $pu0.01 mL$.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Note that it is used also as a standard in manganometry.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Having one chemical that can be used in multiple ways would be good for cutting costs. But I'd expect that sodium oxalate would be a better redox standard than oxalic acid dihydrate.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps sodium oxalate, yes. Btw, we had at high school analytical scales with 0.1 mg resolution, with putting a wire on the scale shoulders, reading the pointer on enlighten scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    DAB (Deutsches Arzneibuch) lists a total of eight "Urtitersubstanzen" (= recommended primary standards), plus a dozen more which I might (for lack of a better word) call subprime standards. KHP is among the former, oxalic acid the latter.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


Using oxalic acid dihydrate as a primary standard just seems really odd to me. I'd expect a primary standard to be oven dried. It just seems weird that a hydrate would be used.



Granted, I saw numerous references to using oxalic acid dihydrate on the web to standardize $ceNaOH$. I assume that for high school and freshman labs that it is "good enough." Using student grade burettes and open air pan balances would greatly limit the possible precision.



Also I'd guess that "good enough purity" oxalic acid dihydrate can be purchased much more cheaply than potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP), which would be my choice.




The analytical method as I remember from nearly 50 years ago...



Prepare a concentrated stock solution (4 molar?) of $ceNaOH$ using distilled water. That went in a jug with a spout just above the bottom. It was capped with a dedicator tube filled with $ceNaOH$ to absorb $ceCO2$ from the atmosphere. It sat for a couple of days to allow sodium carbonate to settle out. ($ceNaOH$ will have some carbonate.)



Dried KHP in an oven at $pu120 ^circC$ for four hours and then put that in a desiccator to cool.



Boiled distilled water to remove dissolved $ceCO2$ and stoppered that to cool.



Using the cooled boiled distilled water made an approximately $pu0.1 M$ solution of $ceNaOH$ by diluting the concentrated stock solution.



Using an analytical balance, weigh out 3 samples of KHP to nearest $pu0.0001 g$ into flasks and carefully dissolved the KHP in the cooled boiled distilled water with swirling to minimize introducing bubbles into the solution.



Then using $ceNaOH$ as the titrant, phenolphthalein was used as the indicator. Again careful to swirl solution, not shake, to prevent bubbles.



Using class 1 50-mL burette which was marked to $pu0.1 mL$s but read to $pu0.01 mL$.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Using oxalic acid dihydrate as a primary standard just seems really odd to me. I'd expect a primary standard to be oven dried. It just seems weird that a hydrate would be used.



Granted, I saw numerous references to using oxalic acid dihydrate on the web to standardize $ceNaOH$. I assume that for high school and freshman labs that it is "good enough." Using student grade burettes and open air pan balances would greatly limit the possible precision.



Also I'd guess that "good enough purity" oxalic acid dihydrate can be purchased much more cheaply than potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP), which would be my choice.




The analytical method as I remember from nearly 50 years ago...



Prepare a concentrated stock solution (4 molar?) of $ceNaOH$ using distilled water. That went in a jug with a spout just above the bottom. It was capped with a dedicator tube filled with $ceNaOH$ to absorb $ceCO2$ from the atmosphere. It sat for a couple of days to allow sodium carbonate to settle out. ($ceNaOH$ will have some carbonate.)



Dried KHP in an oven at $pu120 ^circC$ for four hours and then put that in a desiccator to cool.



Boiled distilled water to remove dissolved $ceCO2$ and stoppered that to cool.



Using the cooled boiled distilled water made an approximately $pu0.1 M$ solution of $ceNaOH$ by diluting the concentrated stock solution.



Using an analytical balance, weigh out 3 samples of KHP to nearest $pu0.0001 g$ into flasks and carefully dissolved the KHP in the cooled boiled distilled water with swirling to minimize introducing bubbles into the solution.



Then using $ceNaOH$ as the titrant, phenolphthalein was used as the indicator. Again careful to swirl solution, not shake, to prevent bubbles.



Using class 1 50-mL burette which was marked to $pu0.1 mL$s but read to $pu0.01 mL$.







acid-base analytical-chemistry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Mathew Mahindaratne

1,69813




1,69813










asked 8 hours ago









MaxWMaxW

15.1k22261




15.1k22261











  • $begingroup$
    Note that it is used also as a standard in manganometry.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Having one chemical that can be used in multiple ways would be good for cutting costs. But I'd expect that sodium oxalate would be a better redox standard than oxalic acid dihydrate.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps sodium oxalate, yes. Btw, we had at high school analytical scales with 0.1 mg resolution, with putting a wire on the scale shoulders, reading the pointer on enlighten scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    DAB (Deutsches Arzneibuch) lists a total of eight "Urtitersubstanzen" (= recommended primary standards), plus a dozen more which I might (for lack of a better word) call subprime standards. KHP is among the former, oxalic acid the latter.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Note that it is used also as a standard in manganometry.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Having one chemical that can be used in multiple ways would be good for cutting costs. But I'd expect that sodium oxalate would be a better redox standard than oxalic acid dihydrate.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps sodium oxalate, yes. Btw, we had at high school analytical scales with 0.1 mg resolution, with putting a wire on the scale shoulders, reading the pointer on enlighten scale.
    $endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    DAB (Deutsches Arzneibuch) lists a total of eight "Urtitersubstanzen" (= recommended primary standards), plus a dozen more which I might (for lack of a better word) call subprime standards. KHP is among the former, oxalic acid the latter.
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Note that it is used also as a standard in manganometry.
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Note that it is used also as a standard in manganometry.
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Having one chemical that can be used in multiple ways would be good for cutting costs. But I'd expect that sodium oxalate would be a better redox standard than oxalic acid dihydrate.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Having one chemical that can be used in multiple ways would be good for cutting costs. But I'd expect that sodium oxalate would be a better redox standard than oxalic acid dihydrate.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Perhaps sodium oxalate, yes. Btw, we had at high school analytical scales with 0.1 mg resolution, with putting a wire on the scale shoulders, reading the pointer on enlighten scale.
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
Perhaps sodium oxalate, yes. Btw, we had at high school analytical scales with 0.1 mg resolution, with putting a wire on the scale shoulders, reading the pointer on enlighten scale.
$endgroup$
– Poutnik
7 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
DAB (Deutsches Arzneibuch) lists a total of eight "Urtitersubstanzen" (= recommended primary standards), plus a dozen more which I might (for lack of a better word) call subprime standards. KHP is among the former, oxalic acid the latter.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago





$begingroup$
DAB (Deutsches Arzneibuch) lists a total of eight "Urtitersubstanzen" (= recommended primary standards), plus a dozen more which I might (for lack of a better word) call subprime standards. KHP is among the former, oxalic acid the latter.
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Jander-Blasius (14. Ed., 1995) uses nonhygroscopic sodium oxalate, dried at 230-250°C (it decomposes above 250 according to wikipedia), to standardise permanganate titer solution against. They give no other useable standard for manganometry, so I assume this is it.



I have no idea why anybody would want to use (or recommend using) the free acid instead, except perhaps to insult his first-year students' intelligence. Can't imagine it's much cheaper, in analytical grade.



For NaOH titer solution, Jander recommends using a secondary standard, e.g. HCl solution. HCl itself is standardised against freshly precipitated and dried sodium carbonate, or HgO ($ce+ 4 KI + H2O -> K2[HgI4] + 2 KOH$) dried over conc. sulfuric acid.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I can certainly understand standardizing HCl using NaCO3. However I'd wonder about the accuracy/precision of using HCL as a secondary standard. Just using KHP to standardize the NaOH would seem to be a better technique. KHP would only need 1 titration instead of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I assume it is (or was) regarded as the better alternative, compared to using any of the widely available solid free acids. The book is a bit old school, perhaps KHP sounded too fancy for them. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$

At first glance, use of oxalic acid dihydrate ($ceH2C2O4.2H2O$ or simply OADH) as a primary standard seems really odd to anybody including me (although I'm not a analytical chemist). I'd also expect a primary standard to be oven dried and cool it in desiccator before use as we all did in our college analytical lab using potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). Yet, there is a good reason why these chemist use OADH continuously.



When it comes to be a good primary standard, Low hygroscopicity is one of the features in consideration, in order to minimize weight changes due to humidity. Oxalic acid dihydrate (OADH) and potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) are the most accessible acids for standardization, because of their low cost and their hardly changing content per a unit (of measurement). Specifically, OADH in the crystalline solid state, represents an interesting species that is still producing many surprises since 1920s. Although there are two extra water molecules in OADH (thich is hard to loose), the alternating acid and these water molecules act both as hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors [Ref.1]. The conclusion of that reference states that:




The trends both in the metric and electronic parameters exhibited by the model clusters with increasing the number of participating oxalic acid and water molecules (Figure 1) shows clearly that the cooperative effect is the major factor in the shortening of H-bonds. This is particularly well pronounced in the optimized $R_ceO··O$ of the carboxylic hydroxyl group bonded to the water molecules. One of the most eloquent steps in the reduction of $R_ceO··O$ is between the hydrated single molecule and the circular model consisting of two acid and two water molecules, indicating that it is the circular motif that primarily supports cooperativity. However, both the polarization evoked by the hydration of the carbonyl groups as well as the crystal field effect also contribute notably to the shortening.




OxalicAcid2H2O



This strong H-bonding make it so stable that two water molecule won't loose in ambient conditions. That's a good reason to use it as a primary standard.



Reference:



  1. J. Stare, D. Hadži, “Cooperativity Assisted Shortening of Hydrogen Bonds in Crystalline Oxalic Acid Dihydrate: DFT and NBO Model Studies,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10(4), 1817–1823 (DOI: 10.1021/ct500167n).





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Interesting. I have been thinking that being hygroscopic would be much more problematic than the salt losing water. Though I know that for instance exposed copper sulfate pentahydrate tends to lose water of hydration rather than be hygroscopic. // I wonder what the relative precision would be using both KHP and OADH.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    44 mins ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111646%2fis-oxalic-acid-dihydrate-considered-a-primary-acid-standard-in-analytical-chemis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Jander-Blasius (14. Ed., 1995) uses nonhygroscopic sodium oxalate, dried at 230-250°C (it decomposes above 250 according to wikipedia), to standardise permanganate titer solution against. They give no other useable standard for manganometry, so I assume this is it.



I have no idea why anybody would want to use (or recommend using) the free acid instead, except perhaps to insult his first-year students' intelligence. Can't imagine it's much cheaper, in analytical grade.



For NaOH titer solution, Jander recommends using a secondary standard, e.g. HCl solution. HCl itself is standardised against freshly precipitated and dried sodium carbonate, or HgO ($ce+ 4 KI + H2O -> K2[HgI4] + 2 KOH$) dried over conc. sulfuric acid.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I can certainly understand standardizing HCl using NaCO3. However I'd wonder about the accuracy/precision of using HCL as a secondary standard. Just using KHP to standardize the NaOH would seem to be a better technique. KHP would only need 1 titration instead of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I assume it is (or was) regarded as the better alternative, compared to using any of the widely available solid free acids. The book is a bit old school, perhaps KHP sounded too fancy for them. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago















2












$begingroup$

Jander-Blasius (14. Ed., 1995) uses nonhygroscopic sodium oxalate, dried at 230-250°C (it decomposes above 250 according to wikipedia), to standardise permanganate titer solution against. They give no other useable standard for manganometry, so I assume this is it.



I have no idea why anybody would want to use (or recommend using) the free acid instead, except perhaps to insult his first-year students' intelligence. Can't imagine it's much cheaper, in analytical grade.



For NaOH titer solution, Jander recommends using a secondary standard, e.g. HCl solution. HCl itself is standardised against freshly precipitated and dried sodium carbonate, or HgO ($ce+ 4 KI + H2O -> K2[HgI4] + 2 KOH$) dried over conc. sulfuric acid.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I can certainly understand standardizing HCl using NaCO3. However I'd wonder about the accuracy/precision of using HCL as a secondary standard. Just using KHP to standardize the NaOH would seem to be a better technique. KHP would only need 1 titration instead of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I assume it is (or was) regarded as the better alternative, compared to using any of the widely available solid free acids. The book is a bit old school, perhaps KHP sounded too fancy for them. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Jander-Blasius (14. Ed., 1995) uses nonhygroscopic sodium oxalate, dried at 230-250°C (it decomposes above 250 according to wikipedia), to standardise permanganate titer solution against. They give no other useable standard for manganometry, so I assume this is it.



I have no idea why anybody would want to use (or recommend using) the free acid instead, except perhaps to insult his first-year students' intelligence. Can't imagine it's much cheaper, in analytical grade.



For NaOH titer solution, Jander recommends using a secondary standard, e.g. HCl solution. HCl itself is standardised against freshly precipitated and dried sodium carbonate, or HgO ($ce+ 4 KI + H2O -> K2[HgI4] + 2 KOH$) dried over conc. sulfuric acid.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Jander-Blasius (14. Ed., 1995) uses nonhygroscopic sodium oxalate, dried at 230-250°C (it decomposes above 250 according to wikipedia), to standardise permanganate titer solution against. They give no other useable standard for manganometry, so I assume this is it.



I have no idea why anybody would want to use (or recommend using) the free acid instead, except perhaps to insult his first-year students' intelligence. Can't imagine it's much cheaper, in analytical grade.



For NaOH titer solution, Jander recommends using a secondary standard, e.g. HCl solution. HCl itself is standardised against freshly precipitated and dried sodium carbonate, or HgO ($ce+ 4 KI + H2O -> K2[HgI4] + 2 KOH$) dried over conc. sulfuric acid.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









KarlKarl

6,1771434




6,1771434











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I can certainly understand standardizing HCl using NaCO3. However I'd wonder about the accuracy/precision of using HCL as a secondary standard. Just using KHP to standardize the NaOH would seem to be a better technique. KHP would only need 1 titration instead of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I assume it is (or was) regarded as the better alternative, compared to using any of the widely available solid free acids. The book is a bit old school, perhaps KHP sounded too fancy for them. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I can certainly understand standardizing HCl using NaCO3. However I'd wonder about the accuracy/precision of using HCL as a secondary standard. Just using KHP to standardize the NaOH would seem to be a better technique. KHP would only need 1 titration instead of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I assume it is (or was) regarded as the better alternative, compared to using any of the widely available solid free acids. The book is a bit old school, perhaps KHP sounded too fancy for them. ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    5 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thanks! I can certainly understand standardizing HCl using NaCO3. However I'd wonder about the accuracy/precision of using HCL as a secondary standard. Just using KHP to standardize the NaOH would seem to be a better technique. KHP would only need 1 titration instead of 2.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
Thanks! I can certainly understand standardizing HCl using NaCO3. However I'd wonder about the accuracy/precision of using HCL as a secondary standard. Just using KHP to standardize the NaOH would seem to be a better technique. KHP would only need 1 titration instead of 2.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
6 hours ago













$begingroup$
I assume it is (or was) regarded as the better alternative, compared to using any of the widely available solid free acids. The book is a bit old school, perhaps KHP sounded too fancy for them. ;-)
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I assume it is (or was) regarded as the better alternative, compared to using any of the widely available solid free acids. The book is a bit old school, perhaps KHP sounded too fancy for them. ;-)
$endgroup$
– Karl
5 hours ago











2












$begingroup$

At first glance, use of oxalic acid dihydrate ($ceH2C2O4.2H2O$ or simply OADH) as a primary standard seems really odd to anybody including me (although I'm not a analytical chemist). I'd also expect a primary standard to be oven dried and cool it in desiccator before use as we all did in our college analytical lab using potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). Yet, there is a good reason why these chemist use OADH continuously.



When it comes to be a good primary standard, Low hygroscopicity is one of the features in consideration, in order to minimize weight changes due to humidity. Oxalic acid dihydrate (OADH) and potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) are the most accessible acids for standardization, because of their low cost and their hardly changing content per a unit (of measurement). Specifically, OADH in the crystalline solid state, represents an interesting species that is still producing many surprises since 1920s. Although there are two extra water molecules in OADH (thich is hard to loose), the alternating acid and these water molecules act both as hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors [Ref.1]. The conclusion of that reference states that:




The trends both in the metric and electronic parameters exhibited by the model clusters with increasing the number of participating oxalic acid and water molecules (Figure 1) shows clearly that the cooperative effect is the major factor in the shortening of H-bonds. This is particularly well pronounced in the optimized $R_ceO··O$ of the carboxylic hydroxyl group bonded to the water molecules. One of the most eloquent steps in the reduction of $R_ceO··O$ is between the hydrated single molecule and the circular model consisting of two acid and two water molecules, indicating that it is the circular motif that primarily supports cooperativity. However, both the polarization evoked by the hydration of the carbonyl groups as well as the crystal field effect also contribute notably to the shortening.




OxalicAcid2H2O



This strong H-bonding make it so stable that two water molecule won't loose in ambient conditions. That's a good reason to use it as a primary standard.



Reference:



  1. J. Stare, D. Hadži, “Cooperativity Assisted Shortening of Hydrogen Bonds in Crystalline Oxalic Acid Dihydrate: DFT and NBO Model Studies,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10(4), 1817–1823 (DOI: 10.1021/ct500167n).





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Interesting. I have been thinking that being hygroscopic would be much more problematic than the salt losing water. Though I know that for instance exposed copper sulfate pentahydrate tends to lose water of hydration rather than be hygroscopic. // I wonder what the relative precision would be using both KHP and OADH.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    44 mins ago















2












$begingroup$

At first glance, use of oxalic acid dihydrate ($ceH2C2O4.2H2O$ or simply OADH) as a primary standard seems really odd to anybody including me (although I'm not a analytical chemist). I'd also expect a primary standard to be oven dried and cool it in desiccator before use as we all did in our college analytical lab using potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). Yet, there is a good reason why these chemist use OADH continuously.



When it comes to be a good primary standard, Low hygroscopicity is one of the features in consideration, in order to minimize weight changes due to humidity. Oxalic acid dihydrate (OADH) and potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) are the most accessible acids for standardization, because of their low cost and their hardly changing content per a unit (of measurement). Specifically, OADH in the crystalline solid state, represents an interesting species that is still producing many surprises since 1920s. Although there are two extra water molecules in OADH (thich is hard to loose), the alternating acid and these water molecules act both as hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors [Ref.1]. The conclusion of that reference states that:




The trends both in the metric and electronic parameters exhibited by the model clusters with increasing the number of participating oxalic acid and water molecules (Figure 1) shows clearly that the cooperative effect is the major factor in the shortening of H-bonds. This is particularly well pronounced in the optimized $R_ceO··O$ of the carboxylic hydroxyl group bonded to the water molecules. One of the most eloquent steps in the reduction of $R_ceO··O$ is between the hydrated single molecule and the circular model consisting of two acid and two water molecules, indicating that it is the circular motif that primarily supports cooperativity. However, both the polarization evoked by the hydration of the carbonyl groups as well as the crystal field effect also contribute notably to the shortening.




OxalicAcid2H2O



This strong H-bonding make it so stable that two water molecule won't loose in ambient conditions. That's a good reason to use it as a primary standard.



Reference:



  1. J. Stare, D. Hadži, “Cooperativity Assisted Shortening of Hydrogen Bonds in Crystalline Oxalic Acid Dihydrate: DFT and NBO Model Studies,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10(4), 1817–1823 (DOI: 10.1021/ct500167n).





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Interesting. I have been thinking that being hygroscopic would be much more problematic than the salt losing water. Though I know that for instance exposed copper sulfate pentahydrate tends to lose water of hydration rather than be hygroscopic. // I wonder what the relative precision would be using both KHP and OADH.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    44 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

At first glance, use of oxalic acid dihydrate ($ceH2C2O4.2H2O$ or simply OADH) as a primary standard seems really odd to anybody including me (although I'm not a analytical chemist). I'd also expect a primary standard to be oven dried and cool it in desiccator before use as we all did in our college analytical lab using potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). Yet, there is a good reason why these chemist use OADH continuously.



When it comes to be a good primary standard, Low hygroscopicity is one of the features in consideration, in order to minimize weight changes due to humidity. Oxalic acid dihydrate (OADH) and potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) are the most accessible acids for standardization, because of their low cost and their hardly changing content per a unit (of measurement). Specifically, OADH in the crystalline solid state, represents an interesting species that is still producing many surprises since 1920s. Although there are two extra water molecules in OADH (thich is hard to loose), the alternating acid and these water molecules act both as hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors [Ref.1]. The conclusion of that reference states that:




The trends both in the metric and electronic parameters exhibited by the model clusters with increasing the number of participating oxalic acid and water molecules (Figure 1) shows clearly that the cooperative effect is the major factor in the shortening of H-bonds. This is particularly well pronounced in the optimized $R_ceO··O$ of the carboxylic hydroxyl group bonded to the water molecules. One of the most eloquent steps in the reduction of $R_ceO··O$ is between the hydrated single molecule and the circular model consisting of two acid and two water molecules, indicating that it is the circular motif that primarily supports cooperativity. However, both the polarization evoked by the hydration of the carbonyl groups as well as the crystal field effect also contribute notably to the shortening.




OxalicAcid2H2O



This strong H-bonding make it so stable that two water molecule won't loose in ambient conditions. That's a good reason to use it as a primary standard.



Reference:



  1. J. Stare, D. Hadži, “Cooperativity Assisted Shortening of Hydrogen Bonds in Crystalline Oxalic Acid Dihydrate: DFT and NBO Model Studies,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10(4), 1817–1823 (DOI: 10.1021/ct500167n).





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



At first glance, use of oxalic acid dihydrate ($ceH2C2O4.2H2O$ or simply OADH) as a primary standard seems really odd to anybody including me (although I'm not a analytical chemist). I'd also expect a primary standard to be oven dried and cool it in desiccator before use as we all did in our college analytical lab using potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). Yet, there is a good reason why these chemist use OADH continuously.



When it comes to be a good primary standard, Low hygroscopicity is one of the features in consideration, in order to minimize weight changes due to humidity. Oxalic acid dihydrate (OADH) and potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) are the most accessible acids for standardization, because of their low cost and their hardly changing content per a unit (of measurement). Specifically, OADH in the crystalline solid state, represents an interesting species that is still producing many surprises since 1920s. Although there are two extra water molecules in OADH (thich is hard to loose), the alternating acid and these water molecules act both as hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors [Ref.1]. The conclusion of that reference states that:




The trends both in the metric and electronic parameters exhibited by the model clusters with increasing the number of participating oxalic acid and water molecules (Figure 1) shows clearly that the cooperative effect is the major factor in the shortening of H-bonds. This is particularly well pronounced in the optimized $R_ceO··O$ of the carboxylic hydroxyl group bonded to the water molecules. One of the most eloquent steps in the reduction of $R_ceO··O$ is between the hydrated single molecule and the circular model consisting of two acid and two water molecules, indicating that it is the circular motif that primarily supports cooperativity. However, both the polarization evoked by the hydration of the carbonyl groups as well as the crystal field effect also contribute notably to the shortening.




OxalicAcid2H2O



This strong H-bonding make it so stable that two water molecule won't loose in ambient conditions. That's a good reason to use it as a primary standard.



Reference:



  1. J. Stare, D. Hadži, “Cooperativity Assisted Shortening of Hydrogen Bonds in Crystalline Oxalic Acid Dihydrate: DFT and NBO Model Studies,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10(4), 1817–1823 (DOI: 10.1021/ct500167n).






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









Mathew MahindaratneMathew Mahindaratne

1,69813




1,69813











  • $begingroup$
    Interesting. I have been thinking that being hygroscopic would be much more problematic than the salt losing water. Though I know that for instance exposed copper sulfate pentahydrate tends to lose water of hydration rather than be hygroscopic. // I wonder what the relative precision would be using both KHP and OADH.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    44 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Interesting. I have been thinking that being hygroscopic would be much more problematic than the salt losing water. Though I know that for instance exposed copper sulfate pentahydrate tends to lose water of hydration rather than be hygroscopic. // I wonder what the relative precision would be using both KHP and OADH.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    44 mins ago















$begingroup$
Interesting. I have been thinking that being hygroscopic would be much more problematic than the salt losing water. Though I know that for instance exposed copper sulfate pentahydrate tends to lose water of hydration rather than be hygroscopic. // I wonder what the relative precision would be using both KHP and OADH.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
44 mins ago




$begingroup$
Interesting. I have been thinking that being hygroscopic would be much more problematic than the salt losing water. Though I know that for instance exposed copper sulfate pentahydrate tends to lose water of hydration rather than be hygroscopic. // I wonder what the relative precision would be using both KHP and OADH.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
44 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111646%2fis-oxalic-acid-dihydrate-considered-a-primary-acid-standard-in-analytical-chemis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar