Naïve RSA decryption in PythonIs my Encryption Module Secure?Basic CalculatorEncoding and decoding small strings of textSecure RSA encryption with PyCryptoHow could I shorten my code in this old graded homework?My images have secrets A.K.A. the making of aesthetic passwords V.2Simple Decrypter/Encrypter(Final)Simple Decryptor/EncryptorGenerate two random primes and find their totientPython RSA/DSA File Cryptography, Key Generation, Key Protection

Could any one tell what PN is this Chip? Thanks~

Knife as defense against stray dogs

CLI: Get information Ubuntu releases

Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?

What are the rules for concealing thieves' tools (or items in general)?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

Do I need to convey a moral for each of my blog post?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Nested Dynamic SOQL Query

Determine voltage drop over 10G resistors with cheap multimeter

When should a starting writer get his own webpage?

Why I don't get the wanted width of tcbox?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space?

Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?

Justification failure in beamer enumerate list

Single word to change groups

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

pipe commands inside find -exec?

Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?

Help with identifying unique aircraft over NE Pennsylvania



Naïve RSA decryption in Python


Is my Encryption Module Secure?Basic CalculatorEncoding and decoding small strings of textSecure RSA encryption with PyCryptoHow could I shorten my code in this old graded homework?My images have secrets A.K.A. the making of aesthetic passwords V.2Simple Decrypter/Encrypter(Final)Simple Decryptor/EncryptorGenerate two random primes and find their totientPython RSA/DSA File Cryptography, Key Generation, Key Protection













0












$begingroup$


I am making a code with basic RSA encryption/decryption. My professor wants me to speed up this function but it is already so simple and I am lost. Any ideas?



def decrypt(kenc,d,n): 
kdec=(kenc**d)%n
return kdec









share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am making a code with basic RSA encryption/decryption. My professor wants me to speed up this function but it is already so simple and I am lost. Any ideas?



    def decrypt(kenc,d,n): 
    kdec=(kenc**d)%n
    return kdec









    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am making a code with basic RSA encryption/decryption. My professor wants me to speed up this function but it is already so simple and I am lost. Any ideas?



      def decrypt(kenc,d,n): 
      kdec=(kenc**d)%n
      return kdec









      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am making a code with basic RSA encryption/decryption. My professor wants me to speed up this function but it is already so simple and I am lost. Any ideas?



      def decrypt(kenc,d,n): 
      kdec=(kenc**d)%n
      return kdec






      python performance homework cryptography






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 mins ago









      200_success

      130k17153419




      130k17153419










      asked 4 hours ago









      Chad TChad T

      161




      161




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Simple does not mean fast, so you cannot judge performance based on how simple the implementation looks. Usually the most efficient way to perform a non-trivial task is not also the simplest way to do it. In this case though, there is a much more efficient solution that is about equally simple, and is probably sufficient.



          There is a serious problem with this implementation: it computes kenc**d.



          kenc**d is in general a very big number that takes a long time to compute, and then it takes a long time again to reduce it modulo n. For example, trying it out with 1024bit RSA (the lowest setting!):



          import Crypto
          from Crypto.PublicKey import RSA
          from Crypto import Random

          random_generator = Random.new().read
          key = RSA.generate(1024, random_generator)

          def decrypt(kenc,d,n):
          kdec=(kenc**d)%n
          return kdec

          (ciphertext,) = key.encrypt(42, 0)
          print(decrypt(ciphertext, key.d, key.n))


          This does not finish in a reasonable time. Estimating the size of kenc**d, it is expected to be up to (and usually close to) 1024*1024 = 1048576 bits (both kenc and d are 1024 bit numbers), that will certainly fit on a computer these days, but that's still a very big number and calculations on such large numbers take a lot of time, especially multiplication and remainder.



          There is a simple remedy: use modular exponentiation, which keeps the size of the numbers that it is working with low throughout the whole calculation by reducing modulo n as it goes along. You could implement it yourself, but Python handily provides a built-in function for this: pow(x, e, n)



          So decrypt can be written as:



          def decrypt(kenc, d, n):
          return pow(kenc, d, n)


          With that change, the code above decodes the message quickly.



          Further improvements are possible, but more complicated, and won't be drop-in replacements.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "196"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215712%2fna%25c3%25afve-rsa-decryption-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Simple does not mean fast, so you cannot judge performance based on how simple the implementation looks. Usually the most efficient way to perform a non-trivial task is not also the simplest way to do it. In this case though, there is a much more efficient solution that is about equally simple, and is probably sufficient.



            There is a serious problem with this implementation: it computes kenc**d.



            kenc**d is in general a very big number that takes a long time to compute, and then it takes a long time again to reduce it modulo n. For example, trying it out with 1024bit RSA (the lowest setting!):



            import Crypto
            from Crypto.PublicKey import RSA
            from Crypto import Random

            random_generator = Random.new().read
            key = RSA.generate(1024, random_generator)

            def decrypt(kenc,d,n):
            kdec=(kenc**d)%n
            return kdec

            (ciphertext,) = key.encrypt(42, 0)
            print(decrypt(ciphertext, key.d, key.n))


            This does not finish in a reasonable time. Estimating the size of kenc**d, it is expected to be up to (and usually close to) 1024*1024 = 1048576 bits (both kenc and d are 1024 bit numbers), that will certainly fit on a computer these days, but that's still a very big number and calculations on such large numbers take a lot of time, especially multiplication and remainder.



            There is a simple remedy: use modular exponentiation, which keeps the size of the numbers that it is working with low throughout the whole calculation by reducing modulo n as it goes along. You could implement it yourself, but Python handily provides a built-in function for this: pow(x, e, n)



            So decrypt can be written as:



            def decrypt(kenc, d, n):
            return pow(kenc, d, n)


            With that change, the code above decodes the message quickly.



            Further improvements are possible, but more complicated, and won't be drop-in replacements.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              Simple does not mean fast, so you cannot judge performance based on how simple the implementation looks. Usually the most efficient way to perform a non-trivial task is not also the simplest way to do it. In this case though, there is a much more efficient solution that is about equally simple, and is probably sufficient.



              There is a serious problem with this implementation: it computes kenc**d.



              kenc**d is in general a very big number that takes a long time to compute, and then it takes a long time again to reduce it modulo n. For example, trying it out with 1024bit RSA (the lowest setting!):



              import Crypto
              from Crypto.PublicKey import RSA
              from Crypto import Random

              random_generator = Random.new().read
              key = RSA.generate(1024, random_generator)

              def decrypt(kenc,d,n):
              kdec=(kenc**d)%n
              return kdec

              (ciphertext,) = key.encrypt(42, 0)
              print(decrypt(ciphertext, key.d, key.n))


              This does not finish in a reasonable time. Estimating the size of kenc**d, it is expected to be up to (and usually close to) 1024*1024 = 1048576 bits (both kenc and d are 1024 bit numbers), that will certainly fit on a computer these days, but that's still a very big number and calculations on such large numbers take a lot of time, especially multiplication and remainder.



              There is a simple remedy: use modular exponentiation, which keeps the size of the numbers that it is working with low throughout the whole calculation by reducing modulo n as it goes along. You could implement it yourself, but Python handily provides a built-in function for this: pow(x, e, n)



              So decrypt can be written as:



              def decrypt(kenc, d, n):
              return pow(kenc, d, n)


              With that change, the code above decodes the message quickly.



              Further improvements are possible, but more complicated, and won't be drop-in replacements.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Simple does not mean fast, so you cannot judge performance based on how simple the implementation looks. Usually the most efficient way to perform a non-trivial task is not also the simplest way to do it. In this case though, there is a much more efficient solution that is about equally simple, and is probably sufficient.



                There is a serious problem with this implementation: it computes kenc**d.



                kenc**d is in general a very big number that takes a long time to compute, and then it takes a long time again to reduce it modulo n. For example, trying it out with 1024bit RSA (the lowest setting!):



                import Crypto
                from Crypto.PublicKey import RSA
                from Crypto import Random

                random_generator = Random.new().read
                key = RSA.generate(1024, random_generator)

                def decrypt(kenc,d,n):
                kdec=(kenc**d)%n
                return kdec

                (ciphertext,) = key.encrypt(42, 0)
                print(decrypt(ciphertext, key.d, key.n))


                This does not finish in a reasonable time. Estimating the size of kenc**d, it is expected to be up to (and usually close to) 1024*1024 = 1048576 bits (both kenc and d are 1024 bit numbers), that will certainly fit on a computer these days, but that's still a very big number and calculations on such large numbers take a lot of time, especially multiplication and remainder.



                There is a simple remedy: use modular exponentiation, which keeps the size of the numbers that it is working with low throughout the whole calculation by reducing modulo n as it goes along. You could implement it yourself, but Python handily provides a built-in function for this: pow(x, e, n)



                So decrypt can be written as:



                def decrypt(kenc, d, n):
                return pow(kenc, d, n)


                With that change, the code above decodes the message quickly.



                Further improvements are possible, but more complicated, and won't be drop-in replacements.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Simple does not mean fast, so you cannot judge performance based on how simple the implementation looks. Usually the most efficient way to perform a non-trivial task is not also the simplest way to do it. In this case though, there is a much more efficient solution that is about equally simple, and is probably sufficient.



                There is a serious problem with this implementation: it computes kenc**d.



                kenc**d is in general a very big number that takes a long time to compute, and then it takes a long time again to reduce it modulo n. For example, trying it out with 1024bit RSA (the lowest setting!):



                import Crypto
                from Crypto.PublicKey import RSA
                from Crypto import Random

                random_generator = Random.new().read
                key = RSA.generate(1024, random_generator)

                def decrypt(kenc,d,n):
                kdec=(kenc**d)%n
                return kdec

                (ciphertext,) = key.encrypt(42, 0)
                print(decrypt(ciphertext, key.d, key.n))


                This does not finish in a reasonable time. Estimating the size of kenc**d, it is expected to be up to (and usually close to) 1024*1024 = 1048576 bits (both kenc and d are 1024 bit numbers), that will certainly fit on a computer these days, but that's still a very big number and calculations on such large numbers take a lot of time, especially multiplication and remainder.



                There is a simple remedy: use modular exponentiation, which keeps the size of the numbers that it is working with low throughout the whole calculation by reducing modulo n as it goes along. You could implement it yourself, but Python handily provides a built-in function for this: pow(x, e, n)



                So decrypt can be written as:



                def decrypt(kenc, d, n):
                return pow(kenc, d, n)


                With that change, the code above decodes the message quickly.



                Further improvements are possible, but more complicated, and won't be drop-in replacements.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                haroldharold

                1,30867




                1,30867



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215712%2fna%25c3%25afve-rsa-decryption-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                    Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?

                    Is my guitar’s action too high? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Strings too stiff on a recently purchased acoustic guitar | Cort AD880CEIs the action of my guitar really high?Μy little finger is too weak to play guitarWith guitar, how long should I give my fingers to strengthen / callous?When playing a fret the guitar sounds mutedPlaying (Barre) chords up the guitar neckI think my guitar strings are wound too tight and I can't play barre chordsF barre chord on an SG guitarHow to find to the right strings of a barre chord by feel?High action on higher fret on my steel acoustic guitar