Did the UK government pay “millions and millions of dollars” to try to snag Julian Assange? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDoes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms not apply to government hiring practices?Does the US government voluntarily underreport inflation?Did NATO instruct anti-government neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine on conducting diversions and waging guerilla?Did Nutrasweet industries pay for 100% of the research showing aspartame is safe?Did millions of illegal immigrants vote in the 2016 USA election?Did the Syrian government use chemical weapons in Khan Shaykhun?Did the Syrian government use Sarin (or other chemical weapons) in the 2017 Khan Shaykhun attack?Did the DNC try to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the Democratic nomination?Did Hillary Clinton pay Russian officials 30 million dollars, through her campaign to get dirt on Trump?Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?
Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Inverse Relationship Between Precision and Recall
If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
What's the name of these plastic connectors
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly defeats?
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?
How to obtain a position of last non-zero element
Output the Arecibo Message
A word that means fill it to the required quantity
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
Worn-tile Scrabble
Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
When should I buy a clipper card after flying to Oakland?
How to translate "being like"?
Ubuntu Server install with full GUI
Did the UK government pay “millions and millions of dollars” to try to snag Julian Assange?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDoes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms not apply to government hiring practices?Does the US government voluntarily underreport inflation?Did NATO instruct anti-government neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine on conducting diversions and waging guerilla?Did Nutrasweet industries pay for 100% of the research showing aspartame is safe?Did millions of illegal immigrants vote in the 2016 USA election?Did the Syrian government use chemical weapons in Khan Shaykhun?Did the Syrian government use Sarin (or other chemical weapons) in the 2017 Khan Shaykhun attack?Did the DNC try to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the Democratic nomination?Did Hillary Clinton pay Russian officials 30 million dollars, through her campaign to get dirt on Trump?Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?
In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:
"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."
Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?
How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?
politics
add a comment |
In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:
"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."
Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?
How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?
politics
7
Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.
– kbelder
4 hours ago
2
No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.
– reirab
1 hour ago
@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...
– Richard
3 mins ago
add a comment |
In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:
"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."
Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?
How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?
politics
In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:
"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."
Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?
How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?
politics
politics
edited 3 hours ago
Christian
17.1k1275209
17.1k1275209
asked 6 hours ago
Gimme the 411Gimme the 411
1287
1287
7
Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.
– kbelder
4 hours ago
2
No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.
– reirab
1 hour ago
@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...
– Richard
3 mins ago
add a comment |
7
Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.
– kbelder
4 hours ago
2
No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.
– reirab
1 hour ago
@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...
– Richard
3 mins ago
7
7
Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.
– kbelder
4 hours ago
Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.
– kbelder
4 hours ago
2
2
No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.
– reirab
1 hour ago
No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.
– reirab
1 hour ago
@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...
– Richard
3 mins ago
@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...
– Richard
3 mins ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.
From The Telegraph in June 2015:
The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.
"As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.
"The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."
The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.
Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.
A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.
add a comment |
According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.
Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015
Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.
...
Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.
Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.
...
The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.
The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.
This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".
add a comment |
No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.
The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.
The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.
Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m
Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.
Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.
From The Telegraph in June 2015:
The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.
"As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.
"The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."
The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.
Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.
A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.
add a comment |
Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.
From The Telegraph in June 2015:
The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.
"As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.
"The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."
The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.
Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.
A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.
add a comment |
Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.
From The Telegraph in June 2015:
The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.
"As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.
"The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."
The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.
Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.
A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.
Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.
From The Telegraph in June 2015:
The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.
"As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.
"The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."
The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.
Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.
A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.
answered 5 hours ago
GiterGiter
7,90263030
7,90263030
add a comment |
add a comment |
According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.
Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015
Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.
...
Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.
Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.
...
The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.
The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.
This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".
add a comment |
According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.
Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015
Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.
...
Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.
Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.
...
The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.
The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.
This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".
add a comment |
According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.
Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015
Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.
...
Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.
Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.
...
The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.
The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.
This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".
According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.
Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015
Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.
...
Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.
Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.
...
The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.
The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.
This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
DenisSDenisS
13.1k45462
13.1k45462
add a comment |
add a comment |
No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.
The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.
The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.
Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m
Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.
Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.
add a comment |
No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.
The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.
The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.
Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m
Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.
Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.
add a comment |
No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.
The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.
The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.
Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m
Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.
Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.
No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.
The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.
The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.
Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m
Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.
Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
RichardRichard
1,09711120
1,09711120
add a comment |
add a comment |
7
Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.
– kbelder
4 hours ago
2
No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.
– reirab
1 hour ago
@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...
– Richard
3 mins ago