Did the UK government pay “millions and millions of dollars” to try to snag Julian Assange? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDoes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms not apply to government hiring practices?Does the US government voluntarily underreport inflation?Did NATO instruct anti-government neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine on conducting diversions and waging guerilla?Did Nutrasweet industries pay for 100% of the research showing aspartame is safe?Did millions of illegal immigrants vote in the 2016 USA election?Did the Syrian government use chemical weapons in Khan Shaykhun?Did the Syrian government use Sarin (or other chemical weapons) in the 2017 Khan Shaykhun attack?Did the DNC try to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the Democratic nomination?Did Hillary Clinton pay Russian officials 30 million dollars, through her campaign to get dirt on Trump?Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?

Currents/voltages graph for an electrical circuit

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

Is it correct to say the Neural Networks are an alternative way of performing Maximum Likelihood Estimation? if not, why?

APIPA and LAN Broadcast Domain

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

Is bread bad for ducks?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

How do PCB vias affect signal quality?

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?



Did the UK government pay “millions and millions of dollars” to try to snag Julian Assange?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDoes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms not apply to government hiring practices?Does the US government voluntarily underreport inflation?Did NATO instruct anti-government neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine on conducting diversions and waging guerilla?Did Nutrasweet industries pay for 100% of the research showing aspartame is safe?Did millions of illegal immigrants vote in the 2016 USA election?Did the Syrian government use chemical weapons in Khan Shaykhun?Did the Syrian government use Sarin (or other chemical weapons) in the 2017 Khan Shaykhun attack?Did the DNC try to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the Democratic nomination?Did Hillary Clinton pay Russian officials 30 million dollars, through her campaign to get dirt on Trump?Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?










12















In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:




"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."




Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?



How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?










share|improve this question



















  • 7





    Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.

    – kbelder
    4 hours ago






  • 6





    No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.

    – reirab
    2 hours ago











  • @reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...

    – Richard
    32 mins ago
















12















In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:




"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."




Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?



How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?










share|improve this question



















  • 7





    Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.

    – kbelder
    4 hours ago






  • 6





    No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.

    – reirab
    2 hours ago











  • @reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...

    – Richard
    32 mins ago














12












12








12








In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:




"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."




Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?



How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?










share|improve this question
















In a Fox News broadcast (timestamp 2:59), Greg Palkot (London-based senior foreign affairs correspondent for Fox News) said of Julian Assange:




"He has cost the UK government and security forces, police here, millions and millions of dollars. They've been guarding that place, waiting for him to come out, to snag him for the past several years..."




Did the UK government really spend millions of dollars to keep the Ecuadorian Embassy guarded for several years to prevent Julian Assange from leaving it and escaping?



How much did it cost and what was the money spent on?







politics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Christian

17.1k1275209




17.1k1275209










asked 6 hours ago









Gimme the 411Gimme the 411

1438




1438







  • 7





    Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.

    – kbelder
    4 hours ago






  • 6





    No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.

    – reirab
    2 hours ago











  • @reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...

    – Richard
    32 mins ago













  • 7





    Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.

    – kbelder
    4 hours ago






  • 6





    No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.

    – reirab
    2 hours ago











  • @reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...

    – Richard
    32 mins ago








7




7





Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.

– kbelder
4 hours ago





Although the answer is probably 'yes', attributing the responsibility of the expense to Assange is a little unfair. It was the government's decision how actively to pursue the 'stakeout', and they could have spent less or much more.

– kbelder
4 hours ago




6




6





No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.

– reirab
2 hours ago





No. They spent millions and millions of pounds.

– reirab
2 hours ago













@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...

– Richard
32 mins ago






@reirab - See my answer They spent nothing...above and beyond their existing and normal budget...

– Richard
32 mins ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















16














Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.



From The Telegraph in June 2015:




The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.



"As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.



"The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."



The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.




Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.



A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.






share|improve this answer






























    7














    No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.



    The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.




    The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.



    Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m




    Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.




    Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.






    share|improve this answer
































      6














      According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.




      Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015




      Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.



      ...



      Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.



      Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.



      ...



      The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.



      The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.




      This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".






      share|improve this answer
































        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        16














        Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.



        From The Telegraph in June 2015:




        The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.



        "As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.



        "The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."



        The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.




        Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.



        A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.






        share|improve this answer



























          16














          Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.



          From The Telegraph in June 2015:




          The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.



          "As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.



          "The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."



          The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.




          Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.



          A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.






          share|improve this answer

























            16












            16








            16







            Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.



            From The Telegraph in June 2015:




            The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.



            "As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.



            "The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."



            The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.




            Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.



            A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.






            share|improve this answer













            Yes, back in 2015 a figure of around £11 million was estimated by the Metropolitan Police. This figure represents the total amount of resources allocated to monitoring the embassy for the three years between Assange entering the embassy (June 2012) and when the figure was reported in June 2015.



            From The Telegraph in June 2015:




            The embassy, behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, is watched by police stationed on the corners of the building, and an officer inside the foyer of the multipurpose red brick residence at all times. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost.



            "As with all long term operations, issues around resourcing are subject to regular review in an attempt to minimise costs," a spokesman told The Telegraph.



            "The estimated full cost to April would be £11.1m. The costs provided are an estimate based on averages, as actual salary and overtime costs will vary daily."



            The Met said the figure included £6.5m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and £2.7m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further £1.1m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration.




            Around October 2015 the constant monitoring and police presence was removed due to being "no longer proportionate", so presumably the figure today is not much higher than it was in 2015.



            A bit of context for these numbers and timelines can be found at this related Politics SE question.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            GiterGiter

            7,92263030




            7,92263030





















                7














                No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.



                The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.




                The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.



                Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m




                Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.




                Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.






                share|improve this answer





























                  7














                  No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.



                  The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.




                  The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.



                  Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m




                  Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.




                  Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    7












                    7








                    7







                    No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.



                    The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.




                    The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.



                    Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m




                    Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.




                    Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.






                    share|improve this answer















                    No additional funds were spent on his capture beyond the spending already budgeted for 'Diplomatic Protection'.



                    The Diplomatic Protection Group is responsible for the guarding of embassies. The money that was spent trying to apprehend Julian Assange from inside the Ecuadorian Embassy was covered by the existing budget assigned by the Metropolitan Police for the protection and guarding of embassies in that part of the UK.




                    The Metropolitan Police said the costs were covered by the budget for diplomatic protection, which provides policing for embassies in the UK.



                    Julian Assange: Costs of policing Wikileaks founder reach £10m




                    Since that money was already budgeted for the guarding of embassies, since that money was spent on guarding an embassy and since no additional funds were subsequently added to their budget to cover the shortfall caused by guarding that embassy, it's arguable that no additional money was spent on his capture. That being said, following the same argument to its logical conclusion, it did result in a focusing of the DPG's resources on a single embassy instead of all of the foreign embassies in the area.




                    Oh, and for the record, the Met didn't spend a single dollar on policing since their entire budget is in Sterling.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 2 hours ago









                    RichardRichard

                    1,10711120




                    1,10711120





















                        6














                        According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.




                        Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015




                        Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.



                        ...



                        Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.



                        Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.



                        ...



                        The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.



                        The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.




                        This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".






                        share|improve this answer





























                          6














                          According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.




                          Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015




                          Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.



                          ...



                          Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.



                          Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.



                          ...



                          The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.



                          The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.




                          This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".






                          share|improve this answer



























                            6












                            6








                            6







                            According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.




                            Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015




                            Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.



                            ...



                            Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.



                            Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.



                            ...



                            The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.



                            The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.




                            This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".






                            share|improve this answer















                            According to the BBC, the cost was over £10 Million as of February 2015.




                            Per this BBC report from 6 February 2015




                            Scotland Yard has spent about £10m providing a 24-hour guard at the Ecuadorean embassy in London since Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claimed asylum there, figures show.



                            ...



                            Between June 2012 and October 2014, direct policing costs were £7.3m, with £1.8m spent on overtime, police said.



                            Scotland Yard confirmed the cost of the operation to UK taxpayers in the first 28 months, until 31 October last year, had reached £9m.



                            ...



                            The cost of a further three months policing is now expected to have taken the total bill to about £10m.



                            The figures - which equate to more than £10,000 a day - were obtained by LBC radio under the Freedom of Information Act.




                            This obviously does not contain the total amount spent, as these numbers were current as of early 2015, but is well within the range of "millions and millions of dollars".







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 6 hours ago

























                            answered 6 hours ago









                            DenisSDenisS

                            13.1k45462




                            13.1k45462













                                Popular posts from this blog

                                名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

                                格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订