Is patent abuse being used to block high-lumen headlamps that run on standard batteries? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In

How do PCB vias affect signal quality?

How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?

Relationship between Gromov-Witten and Taubes' Gromov invariant

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

What is the light source in the black hole images?

Match Roman Numerals

Flight paths in orbit around Ceres?

Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic wars mean?

How to display lines in a file like ls displays files in a directory?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

Output the Arecibo Message

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

"as much details as you can remember"

Can a flute soloist sit?

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

Falsification in Math vs Science

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?



Is patent abuse being used to block high-lumen headlamps that run on standard batteries?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In










0















There are virtually NO high lumen lamps on the market. Old/closed posts related to this have links to VERY FEW and they are discontinued. Nothing comes up from Amazon or Google searches. Is some manufacturer sitting on a patent for LED headlamps that run on standard batteries? Energizer sells non-bike 500+ lumen strap-on-your head headlamp which runs on AAA batteries, as well as small flashlights that are very bright.



Obviously selling lamps with non replacable or proprietary integrated Lithium/Ion is great for the manufacturer because they get a full replacement purchase or a proprietary battery sale after 500-1000 recharge cycles. For disposable lamps, it's a disservice to the environment because LED lights have a much longer lifespan than pre-LED bulbs. Three standard batteries can provide 4.5V which is similar to some of the proprietary batteries.



Right now, it seems like it would be a product idea to sell an adapter to put a $15 energizer flashlight or head lamp on the handlebars.



Note to moderator: this is not a question about bike product recommendations, it's a question about an incident of patent abuse in the bike technology area. It would not be subject to changing offerings in the market.










share|improve this question







New contributor




John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Don’t know the answer. But I chose my front light because it was usb rechargable. I would look at market trends before conspiracy theories.

    – Swifty
    6 hours ago











  • I think the biggest question would be battery life. How long do those non-bike lights run before the batteries die?

    – Noah Sutherland
    6 hours ago











  • Regarding any environmental concerns, there are plenty of bike lights with non-integrated rechargeable batteries. There's absolutely no need to waste 3000 standard batteries in order to save a LED chip.

    – Walto Salonen
    5 hours ago











  • I wrote up an answer which headded off on the path of discharge rates vs total capacity per volume, which is getting quite off topic. Have a browse around electronics.stackexchange.com and everydaycarry.com/posts/6921/… and all the battery comparisons at candlepowerforums.com

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago















0















There are virtually NO high lumen lamps on the market. Old/closed posts related to this have links to VERY FEW and they are discontinued. Nothing comes up from Amazon or Google searches. Is some manufacturer sitting on a patent for LED headlamps that run on standard batteries? Energizer sells non-bike 500+ lumen strap-on-your head headlamp which runs on AAA batteries, as well as small flashlights that are very bright.



Obviously selling lamps with non replacable or proprietary integrated Lithium/Ion is great for the manufacturer because they get a full replacement purchase or a proprietary battery sale after 500-1000 recharge cycles. For disposable lamps, it's a disservice to the environment because LED lights have a much longer lifespan than pre-LED bulbs. Three standard batteries can provide 4.5V which is similar to some of the proprietary batteries.



Right now, it seems like it would be a product idea to sell an adapter to put a $15 energizer flashlight or head lamp on the handlebars.



Note to moderator: this is not a question about bike product recommendations, it's a question about an incident of patent abuse in the bike technology area. It would not be subject to changing offerings in the market.










share|improve this question







New contributor




John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Don’t know the answer. But I chose my front light because it was usb rechargable. I would look at market trends before conspiracy theories.

    – Swifty
    6 hours ago











  • I think the biggest question would be battery life. How long do those non-bike lights run before the batteries die?

    – Noah Sutherland
    6 hours ago











  • Regarding any environmental concerns, there are plenty of bike lights with non-integrated rechargeable batteries. There's absolutely no need to waste 3000 standard batteries in order to save a LED chip.

    – Walto Salonen
    5 hours ago











  • I wrote up an answer which headded off on the path of discharge rates vs total capacity per volume, which is getting quite off topic. Have a browse around electronics.stackexchange.com and everydaycarry.com/posts/6921/… and all the battery comparisons at candlepowerforums.com

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago













0












0








0








There are virtually NO high lumen lamps on the market. Old/closed posts related to this have links to VERY FEW and they are discontinued. Nothing comes up from Amazon or Google searches. Is some manufacturer sitting on a patent for LED headlamps that run on standard batteries? Energizer sells non-bike 500+ lumen strap-on-your head headlamp which runs on AAA batteries, as well as small flashlights that are very bright.



Obviously selling lamps with non replacable or proprietary integrated Lithium/Ion is great for the manufacturer because they get a full replacement purchase or a proprietary battery sale after 500-1000 recharge cycles. For disposable lamps, it's a disservice to the environment because LED lights have a much longer lifespan than pre-LED bulbs. Three standard batteries can provide 4.5V which is similar to some of the proprietary batteries.



Right now, it seems like it would be a product idea to sell an adapter to put a $15 energizer flashlight or head lamp on the handlebars.



Note to moderator: this is not a question about bike product recommendations, it's a question about an incident of patent abuse in the bike technology area. It would not be subject to changing offerings in the market.










share|improve this question







New contributor




John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












There are virtually NO high lumen lamps on the market. Old/closed posts related to this have links to VERY FEW and they are discontinued. Nothing comes up from Amazon or Google searches. Is some manufacturer sitting on a patent for LED headlamps that run on standard batteries? Energizer sells non-bike 500+ lumen strap-on-your head headlamp which runs on AAA batteries, as well as small flashlights that are very bright.



Obviously selling lamps with non replacable or proprietary integrated Lithium/Ion is great for the manufacturer because they get a full replacement purchase or a proprietary battery sale after 500-1000 recharge cycles. For disposable lamps, it's a disservice to the environment because LED lights have a much longer lifespan than pre-LED bulbs. Three standard batteries can provide 4.5V which is similar to some of the proprietary batteries.



Right now, it seems like it would be a product idea to sell an adapter to put a $15 energizer flashlight or head lamp on the handlebars.



Note to moderator: this is not a question about bike product recommendations, it's a question about an incident of patent abuse in the bike technology area. It would not be subject to changing offerings in the market.







headlights led-lights






share|improve this question







New contributor




John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









John MeyerJohn Meyer

1072




1072




New contributor




John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






John Meyer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    Don’t know the answer. But I chose my front light because it was usb rechargable. I would look at market trends before conspiracy theories.

    – Swifty
    6 hours ago











  • I think the biggest question would be battery life. How long do those non-bike lights run before the batteries die?

    – Noah Sutherland
    6 hours ago











  • Regarding any environmental concerns, there are plenty of bike lights with non-integrated rechargeable batteries. There's absolutely no need to waste 3000 standard batteries in order to save a LED chip.

    – Walto Salonen
    5 hours ago











  • I wrote up an answer which headded off on the path of discharge rates vs total capacity per volume, which is getting quite off topic. Have a browse around electronics.stackexchange.com and everydaycarry.com/posts/6921/… and all the battery comparisons at candlepowerforums.com

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    Don’t know the answer. But I chose my front light because it was usb rechargable. I would look at market trends before conspiracy theories.

    – Swifty
    6 hours ago











  • I think the biggest question would be battery life. How long do those non-bike lights run before the batteries die?

    – Noah Sutherland
    6 hours ago











  • Regarding any environmental concerns, there are plenty of bike lights with non-integrated rechargeable batteries. There's absolutely no need to waste 3000 standard batteries in order to save a LED chip.

    – Walto Salonen
    5 hours ago











  • I wrote up an answer which headded off on the path of discharge rates vs total capacity per volume, which is getting quite off topic. Have a browse around electronics.stackexchange.com and everydaycarry.com/posts/6921/… and all the battery comparisons at candlepowerforums.com

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago







1




1





Don’t know the answer. But I chose my front light because it was usb rechargable. I would look at market trends before conspiracy theories.

– Swifty
6 hours ago





Don’t know the answer. But I chose my front light because it was usb rechargable. I would look at market trends before conspiracy theories.

– Swifty
6 hours ago













I think the biggest question would be battery life. How long do those non-bike lights run before the batteries die?

– Noah Sutherland
6 hours ago





I think the biggest question would be battery life. How long do those non-bike lights run before the batteries die?

– Noah Sutherland
6 hours ago













Regarding any environmental concerns, there are plenty of bike lights with non-integrated rechargeable batteries. There's absolutely no need to waste 3000 standard batteries in order to save a LED chip.

– Walto Salonen
5 hours ago





Regarding any environmental concerns, there are plenty of bike lights with non-integrated rechargeable batteries. There's absolutely no need to waste 3000 standard batteries in order to save a LED chip.

– Walto Salonen
5 hours ago













I wrote up an answer which headded off on the path of discharge rates vs total capacity per volume, which is getting quite off topic. Have a browse around electronics.stackexchange.com and everydaycarry.com/posts/6921/… and all the battery comparisons at candlepowerforums.com

– Criggie
2 hours ago





I wrote up an answer which headded off on the path of discharge rates vs total capacity per volume, which is getting quite off topic. Have a browse around electronics.stackexchange.com and everydaycarry.com/posts/6921/… and all the battery comparisons at candlepowerforums.com

– Criggie
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Replaceable standard batteries have several disadvantages that make them a poor choice for small portable devices like headlights.



  • For disposable batteries, they cost money and present a waste problem afterwards. Common alkaline cells slightly better energy density than Li-Ion cells, but the difference isn't huge.


  • Because standard battery powered devices can't be trusted to have battery protection circuits that are required for Li-Ion and Li-Po, rechargeable batteries are limited to rechargeable Ni-Mh cells that have lower energy density and are slow to recharge.


  • Standard batteries come in fixed size and shape, and the rest of the device has to be designed around them. Built in batteries have many more sizes and shapes to choose from, and in particular Li-Po can be manufactured in almost any shape.


  • To be able to replace the batteries, you need a battery holder and a hatch. These make the case more complex to design, heavier, more expensive to manufacture and more fragile. If the device needs to be waterproof (it's really nice if headlights don't fail when it rains) the design becomes even more complex.


With these problems, it's not a surprise that replaceable batteries are not very popular.






share|improve this answer
































    2














    They do exist, but they're not necessarily cheap or common.



    Audaxers (randoneurs) are perhaps more keen than typical cyclists on lights that can be recharged in 5 minutes in a 24 hour petrol station (as a fall-back to our dynamos) so this is a regular topic of conversation. Of course these are road lights, with a good beam pattern that makes efficient us of the light. They're not so good for trail riding but not impossible either (paired with a headtorch as they don't really illuminate overhanging branches.



    I don't have such a light myself at the moment but one example that's recommended by others: The Busch + Müller Ixon IQ (premium). Hope used to make one but they discontinued it - that's evidence suggesting no patent issues, but not enough of a market.



    There are a couple of alternatives:



    • There are some lights designed to be run off a 5V battery bank, as you might use to charge your phone. The Knog PWR Trail is a particularly tidy example. I'm sure they'd do very well off 4 standard cells (maybe add a series power diode if using alkalines, just to bring the voltage down a touch, if the lights run a bit warm otherwise).


    • Some of the cheap Chinese lights can take a range of batteries (e.g. they come with a holder for 3xAAA and another for 1x18650, so have a look on dealextreme/ali-express. They also sell flashlight clips which are good for putting high-brightness torches on your bars.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      I have a Ixon IQ and wouldn't recommend one unless you really need replaceable batteries. Compared to slightly dimmer Ixon Core it is huge and heavy, and even though battery life is advertised to be better, it switches to low power mode sooner. The reason why I bought one is that the Core I had fell to asphalt and broke, and IQ has stronger handlebar mount.

      – ojs
      2 hours ago











    • @ojs, fair enough. I use USB rechargeable or big trail lights to back up my dynamo setup, but for those that want to be able to buy batteries it does seem to be the best quality option. Do you use yours on NiMH or alkaline? I've had devices that turn off surprisingly soon on the former because of the different discharge Prudhoe

      – Chris H
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "126"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    John Meyer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60318%2fis-patent-abuse-being-used-to-block-high-lumen-headlamps-that-run-on-standard-ba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    Replaceable standard batteries have several disadvantages that make them a poor choice for small portable devices like headlights.



    • For disposable batteries, they cost money and present a waste problem afterwards. Common alkaline cells slightly better energy density than Li-Ion cells, but the difference isn't huge.


    • Because standard battery powered devices can't be trusted to have battery protection circuits that are required for Li-Ion and Li-Po, rechargeable batteries are limited to rechargeable Ni-Mh cells that have lower energy density and are slow to recharge.


    • Standard batteries come in fixed size and shape, and the rest of the device has to be designed around them. Built in batteries have many more sizes and shapes to choose from, and in particular Li-Po can be manufactured in almost any shape.


    • To be able to replace the batteries, you need a battery holder and a hatch. These make the case more complex to design, heavier, more expensive to manufacture and more fragile. If the device needs to be waterproof (it's really nice if headlights don't fail when it rains) the design becomes even more complex.


    With these problems, it's not a surprise that replaceable batteries are not very popular.






    share|improve this answer





























      5














      Replaceable standard batteries have several disadvantages that make them a poor choice for small portable devices like headlights.



      • For disposable batteries, they cost money and present a waste problem afterwards. Common alkaline cells slightly better energy density than Li-Ion cells, but the difference isn't huge.


      • Because standard battery powered devices can't be trusted to have battery protection circuits that are required for Li-Ion and Li-Po, rechargeable batteries are limited to rechargeable Ni-Mh cells that have lower energy density and are slow to recharge.


      • Standard batteries come in fixed size and shape, and the rest of the device has to be designed around them. Built in batteries have many more sizes and shapes to choose from, and in particular Li-Po can be manufactured in almost any shape.


      • To be able to replace the batteries, you need a battery holder and a hatch. These make the case more complex to design, heavier, more expensive to manufacture and more fragile. If the device needs to be waterproof (it's really nice if headlights don't fail when it rains) the design becomes even more complex.


      With these problems, it's not a surprise that replaceable batteries are not very popular.






      share|improve this answer



























        5












        5








        5







        Replaceable standard batteries have several disadvantages that make them a poor choice for small portable devices like headlights.



        • For disposable batteries, they cost money and present a waste problem afterwards. Common alkaline cells slightly better energy density than Li-Ion cells, but the difference isn't huge.


        • Because standard battery powered devices can't be trusted to have battery protection circuits that are required for Li-Ion and Li-Po, rechargeable batteries are limited to rechargeable Ni-Mh cells that have lower energy density and are slow to recharge.


        • Standard batteries come in fixed size and shape, and the rest of the device has to be designed around them. Built in batteries have many more sizes and shapes to choose from, and in particular Li-Po can be manufactured in almost any shape.


        • To be able to replace the batteries, you need a battery holder and a hatch. These make the case more complex to design, heavier, more expensive to manufacture and more fragile. If the device needs to be waterproof (it's really nice if headlights don't fail when it rains) the design becomes even more complex.


        With these problems, it's not a surprise that replaceable batteries are not very popular.






        share|improve this answer















        Replaceable standard batteries have several disadvantages that make them a poor choice for small portable devices like headlights.



        • For disposable batteries, they cost money and present a waste problem afterwards. Common alkaline cells slightly better energy density than Li-Ion cells, but the difference isn't huge.


        • Because standard battery powered devices can't be trusted to have battery protection circuits that are required for Li-Ion and Li-Po, rechargeable batteries are limited to rechargeable Ni-Mh cells that have lower energy density and are slow to recharge.


        • Standard batteries come in fixed size and shape, and the rest of the device has to be designed around them. Built in batteries have many more sizes and shapes to choose from, and in particular Li-Po can be manufactured in almost any shape.


        • To be able to replace the batteries, you need a battery holder and a hatch. These make the case more complex to design, heavier, more expensive to manufacture and more fragile. If the device needs to be waterproof (it's really nice if headlights don't fail when it rains) the design becomes even more complex.


        With these problems, it's not a surprise that replaceable batteries are not very popular.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 4 hours ago









        ojsojs

        12.2k22244




        12.2k22244





















            2














            They do exist, but they're not necessarily cheap or common.



            Audaxers (randoneurs) are perhaps more keen than typical cyclists on lights that can be recharged in 5 minutes in a 24 hour petrol station (as a fall-back to our dynamos) so this is a regular topic of conversation. Of course these are road lights, with a good beam pattern that makes efficient us of the light. They're not so good for trail riding but not impossible either (paired with a headtorch as they don't really illuminate overhanging branches.



            I don't have such a light myself at the moment but one example that's recommended by others: The Busch + Müller Ixon IQ (premium). Hope used to make one but they discontinued it - that's evidence suggesting no patent issues, but not enough of a market.



            There are a couple of alternatives:



            • There are some lights designed to be run off a 5V battery bank, as you might use to charge your phone. The Knog PWR Trail is a particularly tidy example. I'm sure they'd do very well off 4 standard cells (maybe add a series power diode if using alkalines, just to bring the voltage down a touch, if the lights run a bit warm otherwise).


            • Some of the cheap Chinese lights can take a range of batteries (e.g. they come with a holder for 3xAAA and another for 1x18650, so have a look on dealextreme/ali-express. They also sell flashlight clips which are good for putting high-brightness torches on your bars.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              I have a Ixon IQ and wouldn't recommend one unless you really need replaceable batteries. Compared to slightly dimmer Ixon Core it is huge and heavy, and even though battery life is advertised to be better, it switches to low power mode sooner. The reason why I bought one is that the Core I had fell to asphalt and broke, and IQ has stronger handlebar mount.

              – ojs
              2 hours ago











            • @ojs, fair enough. I use USB rechargeable or big trail lights to back up my dynamo setup, but for those that want to be able to buy batteries it does seem to be the best quality option. Do you use yours on NiMH or alkaline? I've had devices that turn off surprisingly soon on the former because of the different discharge Prudhoe

              – Chris H
              1 hour ago















            2














            They do exist, but they're not necessarily cheap or common.



            Audaxers (randoneurs) are perhaps more keen than typical cyclists on lights that can be recharged in 5 minutes in a 24 hour petrol station (as a fall-back to our dynamos) so this is a regular topic of conversation. Of course these are road lights, with a good beam pattern that makes efficient us of the light. They're not so good for trail riding but not impossible either (paired with a headtorch as they don't really illuminate overhanging branches.



            I don't have such a light myself at the moment but one example that's recommended by others: The Busch + Müller Ixon IQ (premium). Hope used to make one but they discontinued it - that's evidence suggesting no patent issues, but not enough of a market.



            There are a couple of alternatives:



            • There are some lights designed to be run off a 5V battery bank, as you might use to charge your phone. The Knog PWR Trail is a particularly tidy example. I'm sure they'd do very well off 4 standard cells (maybe add a series power diode if using alkalines, just to bring the voltage down a touch, if the lights run a bit warm otherwise).


            • Some of the cheap Chinese lights can take a range of batteries (e.g. they come with a holder for 3xAAA and another for 1x18650, so have a look on dealextreme/ali-express. They also sell flashlight clips which are good for putting high-brightness torches on your bars.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              I have a Ixon IQ and wouldn't recommend one unless you really need replaceable batteries. Compared to slightly dimmer Ixon Core it is huge and heavy, and even though battery life is advertised to be better, it switches to low power mode sooner. The reason why I bought one is that the Core I had fell to asphalt and broke, and IQ has stronger handlebar mount.

              – ojs
              2 hours ago











            • @ojs, fair enough. I use USB rechargeable or big trail lights to back up my dynamo setup, but for those that want to be able to buy batteries it does seem to be the best quality option. Do you use yours on NiMH or alkaline? I've had devices that turn off surprisingly soon on the former because of the different discharge Prudhoe

              – Chris H
              1 hour ago













            2












            2








            2







            They do exist, but they're not necessarily cheap or common.



            Audaxers (randoneurs) are perhaps more keen than typical cyclists on lights that can be recharged in 5 minutes in a 24 hour petrol station (as a fall-back to our dynamos) so this is a regular topic of conversation. Of course these are road lights, with a good beam pattern that makes efficient us of the light. They're not so good for trail riding but not impossible either (paired with a headtorch as they don't really illuminate overhanging branches.



            I don't have such a light myself at the moment but one example that's recommended by others: The Busch + Müller Ixon IQ (premium). Hope used to make one but they discontinued it - that's evidence suggesting no patent issues, but not enough of a market.



            There are a couple of alternatives:



            • There are some lights designed to be run off a 5V battery bank, as you might use to charge your phone. The Knog PWR Trail is a particularly tidy example. I'm sure they'd do very well off 4 standard cells (maybe add a series power diode if using alkalines, just to bring the voltage down a touch, if the lights run a bit warm otherwise).


            • Some of the cheap Chinese lights can take a range of batteries (e.g. they come with a holder for 3xAAA and another for 1x18650, so have a look on dealextreme/ali-express. They also sell flashlight clips which are good for putting high-brightness torches on your bars.






            share|improve this answer













            They do exist, but they're not necessarily cheap or common.



            Audaxers (randoneurs) are perhaps more keen than typical cyclists on lights that can be recharged in 5 minutes in a 24 hour petrol station (as a fall-back to our dynamos) so this is a regular topic of conversation. Of course these are road lights, with a good beam pattern that makes efficient us of the light. They're not so good for trail riding but not impossible either (paired with a headtorch as they don't really illuminate overhanging branches.



            I don't have such a light myself at the moment but one example that's recommended by others: The Busch + Müller Ixon IQ (premium). Hope used to make one but they discontinued it - that's evidence suggesting no patent issues, but not enough of a market.



            There are a couple of alternatives:



            • There are some lights designed to be run off a 5V battery bank, as you might use to charge your phone. The Knog PWR Trail is a particularly tidy example. I'm sure they'd do very well off 4 standard cells (maybe add a series power diode if using alkalines, just to bring the voltage down a touch, if the lights run a bit warm otherwise).


            • Some of the cheap Chinese lights can take a range of batteries (e.g. they come with a holder for 3xAAA and another for 1x18650, so have a look on dealextreme/ali-express. They also sell flashlight clips which are good for putting high-brightness torches on your bars.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            Chris HChris H

            24.3k138108




            24.3k138108







            • 1





              I have a Ixon IQ and wouldn't recommend one unless you really need replaceable batteries. Compared to slightly dimmer Ixon Core it is huge and heavy, and even though battery life is advertised to be better, it switches to low power mode sooner. The reason why I bought one is that the Core I had fell to asphalt and broke, and IQ has stronger handlebar mount.

              – ojs
              2 hours ago











            • @ojs, fair enough. I use USB rechargeable or big trail lights to back up my dynamo setup, but for those that want to be able to buy batteries it does seem to be the best quality option. Do you use yours on NiMH or alkaline? I've had devices that turn off surprisingly soon on the former because of the different discharge Prudhoe

              – Chris H
              1 hour ago












            • 1





              I have a Ixon IQ and wouldn't recommend one unless you really need replaceable batteries. Compared to slightly dimmer Ixon Core it is huge and heavy, and even though battery life is advertised to be better, it switches to low power mode sooner. The reason why I bought one is that the Core I had fell to asphalt and broke, and IQ has stronger handlebar mount.

              – ojs
              2 hours ago











            • @ojs, fair enough. I use USB rechargeable or big trail lights to back up my dynamo setup, but for those that want to be able to buy batteries it does seem to be the best quality option. Do you use yours on NiMH or alkaline? I've had devices that turn off surprisingly soon on the former because of the different discharge Prudhoe

              – Chris H
              1 hour ago







            1




            1





            I have a Ixon IQ and wouldn't recommend one unless you really need replaceable batteries. Compared to slightly dimmer Ixon Core it is huge and heavy, and even though battery life is advertised to be better, it switches to low power mode sooner. The reason why I bought one is that the Core I had fell to asphalt and broke, and IQ has stronger handlebar mount.

            – ojs
            2 hours ago





            I have a Ixon IQ and wouldn't recommend one unless you really need replaceable batteries. Compared to slightly dimmer Ixon Core it is huge and heavy, and even though battery life is advertised to be better, it switches to low power mode sooner. The reason why I bought one is that the Core I had fell to asphalt and broke, and IQ has stronger handlebar mount.

            – ojs
            2 hours ago













            @ojs, fair enough. I use USB rechargeable or big trail lights to back up my dynamo setup, but for those that want to be able to buy batteries it does seem to be the best quality option. Do you use yours on NiMH or alkaline? I've had devices that turn off surprisingly soon on the former because of the different discharge Prudhoe

            – Chris H
            1 hour ago





            @ojs, fair enough. I use USB rechargeable or big trail lights to back up my dynamo setup, but for those that want to be able to buy batteries it does seem to be the best quality option. Do you use yours on NiMH or alkaline? I've had devices that turn off surprisingly soon on the former because of the different discharge Prudhoe

            – Chris H
            1 hour ago










            John Meyer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            John Meyer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            John Meyer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            John Meyer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60318%2fis-patent-abuse-being-used-to-block-high-lumen-headlamps-that-run-on-standard-ba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

            格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订