What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?What are all the ways a player can get to the Astral Plane?What happened to the Barrens of Doom and Despair during and after the Spellplague?Did the spellplague change the cosmology of other crystal spheres too, or just realmspace?What D&D creatures are the most appropriate to act as mercenaries?Can Gated Fiends/Celestials Die Permanently?Is there a Forgotten Realms campaign setting book for D&D 5e?What differentiates “Gods” from other entities in the Forgotten Realm cosmology?What rules are there for deciding what specific items to award when the loot table is unclear?Are the Material Planes comprising the various campaign settings surrounded by a shared set of outer planes?In an auction, how might magic item collectors in other lands bid remotely?How much would an average adventurer in the Forgotten Realms know about the Great Wheel Cosmology?

How can my private key be revealed if I use the same nonce while generating the signature?

What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

how to analyze "是其于主也至忠矣"

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

quarter to five p.m

Lay out the Carpet

How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?

Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?

Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races

Why did Kant, Hegel, and Adorno leave some words and phrases in the Greek alphabet?

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

Will it be accepted, if there is no ''Main Character" stereotype?

How does residential electricity work?

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Trouble understanding overseas colleagues

apt-get update is failing in debian

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Opposite of a diet

Is it correct to write "is not focus on"?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

Is a roofing delivery truck likely to crack my driveway slab?



What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?


What are all the ways a player can get to the Astral Plane?What happened to the Barrens of Doom and Despair during and after the Spellplague?Did the spellplague change the cosmology of other crystal spheres too, or just realmspace?What D&D creatures are the most appropriate to act as mercenaries?Can Gated Fiends/Celestials Die Permanently?Is there a Forgotten Realms campaign setting book for D&D 5e?What differentiates “Gods” from other entities in the Forgotten Realm cosmology?What rules are there for deciding what specific items to award when the loot table is unclear?Are the Material Planes comprising the various campaign settings surrounded by a shared set of outer planes?In an auction, how might magic item collectors in other lands bid remotely?How much would an average adventurer in the Forgotten Realms know about the Great Wheel Cosmology?













1












$begingroup$


I'm currently working on a homebrew world for a campaign of mine, which is currently on hold. We played a few sessions before some of our newer players decided that D&D wasn't for them, and I figured out that I want to DM a less Forgotten-Realms-clone-like world.

Overall design intent:



  1. I don't want to have a 1:1 identical world to the Forgotten
    Realms, with the only difference being the Material Plane,



  2. I'm not entirely content with the planar cosmology and pantheons
    in the Forgotten Realms.



    Since I personally don't like the Astral Plane in particular, I'm thinking about outright removing it from my world.



However, the DMG states on page 43 on "The Planes":




At minimum, most D&D campaigns require these elements:



  • [...]

  • A way of getting from one plane to another

  • A way for spells and monsters that use the Astral Plane and the Ethereal Plane to function



Obviously, I don't have to adhere to these guidelines. However, I'm aware that a number of spells, creatures, magical items and other things in 5e directly refer to the Astral Plane. Miniman's answer to the question What are all the ways a player can get to the Astral Plane? lists quite a few of these.



Naturally, spells (like Astral Projection), creatures (including playable races like Gith) or magical objects that refer to the Astral Plane simply don't exist (in unmodified form) in this campaign. I'd homebrew something for what happens when you put e.g. two Bags of Holding into each other.



I also know that the Astral Plane can be used as a means of travelling between different worlds, using the color pools located on it. I'm thinking about implementing a Yggdrasil-style World Tree in my world, which would assume this job.



Are there any other ramifications as a result of not having an Astral Plane in a 5e campaign setting?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    initally, tier 1 or 2. However, the world will serve as a setting for all tiers, so the PC's level shouldn't really be relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    47 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just as an aside, the Astral Plane was a thing long before FR became a setting. It was in the AD&D 1e books a a thing. (Greyhawk default world if we view E Gygax as creator, and there were references to it in the OD&D supplements). Thus your reference to FR is irrelevant to the question. The astral plane touches most settings in one way or another. Suggest you edit your question to remove FR reference (it will make for a tighter/cleaner question). Also suggest you tighten your title: what are the mechanical effects of not having an Astral Plane in my setting. Up to you.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    40 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Title seems fine imho.
    $endgroup$
    – Quadratic Wizard
    32 mins ago















1












$begingroup$


I'm currently working on a homebrew world for a campaign of mine, which is currently on hold. We played a few sessions before some of our newer players decided that D&D wasn't for them, and I figured out that I want to DM a less Forgotten-Realms-clone-like world.

Overall design intent:



  1. I don't want to have a 1:1 identical world to the Forgotten
    Realms, with the only difference being the Material Plane,



  2. I'm not entirely content with the planar cosmology and pantheons
    in the Forgotten Realms.



    Since I personally don't like the Astral Plane in particular, I'm thinking about outright removing it from my world.



However, the DMG states on page 43 on "The Planes":




At minimum, most D&D campaigns require these elements:



  • [...]

  • A way of getting from one plane to another

  • A way for spells and monsters that use the Astral Plane and the Ethereal Plane to function



Obviously, I don't have to adhere to these guidelines. However, I'm aware that a number of spells, creatures, magical items and other things in 5e directly refer to the Astral Plane. Miniman's answer to the question What are all the ways a player can get to the Astral Plane? lists quite a few of these.



Naturally, spells (like Astral Projection), creatures (including playable races like Gith) or magical objects that refer to the Astral Plane simply don't exist (in unmodified form) in this campaign. I'd homebrew something for what happens when you put e.g. two Bags of Holding into each other.



I also know that the Astral Plane can be used as a means of travelling between different worlds, using the color pools located on it. I'm thinking about implementing a Yggdrasil-style World Tree in my world, which would assume this job.



Are there any other ramifications as a result of not having an Astral Plane in a 5e campaign setting?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    initally, tier 1 or 2. However, the world will serve as a setting for all tiers, so the PC's level shouldn't really be relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    47 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just as an aside, the Astral Plane was a thing long before FR became a setting. It was in the AD&D 1e books a a thing. (Greyhawk default world if we view E Gygax as creator, and there were references to it in the OD&D supplements). Thus your reference to FR is irrelevant to the question. The astral plane touches most settings in one way or another. Suggest you edit your question to remove FR reference (it will make for a tighter/cleaner question). Also suggest you tighten your title: what are the mechanical effects of not having an Astral Plane in my setting. Up to you.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    40 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Title seems fine imho.
    $endgroup$
    – Quadratic Wizard
    32 mins ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm currently working on a homebrew world for a campaign of mine, which is currently on hold. We played a few sessions before some of our newer players decided that D&D wasn't for them, and I figured out that I want to DM a less Forgotten-Realms-clone-like world.

Overall design intent:



  1. I don't want to have a 1:1 identical world to the Forgotten
    Realms, with the only difference being the Material Plane,



  2. I'm not entirely content with the planar cosmology and pantheons
    in the Forgotten Realms.



    Since I personally don't like the Astral Plane in particular, I'm thinking about outright removing it from my world.



However, the DMG states on page 43 on "The Planes":




At minimum, most D&D campaigns require these elements:



  • [...]

  • A way of getting from one plane to another

  • A way for spells and monsters that use the Astral Plane and the Ethereal Plane to function



Obviously, I don't have to adhere to these guidelines. However, I'm aware that a number of spells, creatures, magical items and other things in 5e directly refer to the Astral Plane. Miniman's answer to the question What are all the ways a player can get to the Astral Plane? lists quite a few of these.



Naturally, spells (like Astral Projection), creatures (including playable races like Gith) or magical objects that refer to the Astral Plane simply don't exist (in unmodified form) in this campaign. I'd homebrew something for what happens when you put e.g. two Bags of Holding into each other.



I also know that the Astral Plane can be used as a means of travelling between different worlds, using the color pools located on it. I'm thinking about implementing a Yggdrasil-style World Tree in my world, which would assume this job.



Are there any other ramifications as a result of not having an Astral Plane in a 5e campaign setting?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm currently working on a homebrew world for a campaign of mine, which is currently on hold. We played a few sessions before some of our newer players decided that D&D wasn't for them, and I figured out that I want to DM a less Forgotten-Realms-clone-like world.

Overall design intent:



  1. I don't want to have a 1:1 identical world to the Forgotten
    Realms, with the only difference being the Material Plane,



  2. I'm not entirely content with the planar cosmology and pantheons
    in the Forgotten Realms.



    Since I personally don't like the Astral Plane in particular, I'm thinking about outright removing it from my world.



However, the DMG states on page 43 on "The Planes":




At minimum, most D&D campaigns require these elements:



  • [...]

  • A way of getting from one plane to another

  • A way for spells and monsters that use the Astral Plane and the Ethereal Plane to function



Obviously, I don't have to adhere to these guidelines. However, I'm aware that a number of spells, creatures, magical items and other things in 5e directly refer to the Astral Plane. Miniman's answer to the question What are all the ways a player can get to the Astral Plane? lists quite a few of these.



Naturally, spells (like Astral Projection), creatures (including playable races like Gith) or magical objects that refer to the Astral Plane simply don't exist (in unmodified form) in this campaign. I'd homebrew something for what happens when you put e.g. two Bags of Holding into each other.



I also know that the Astral Plane can be used as a means of travelling between different worlds, using the color pools located on it. I'm thinking about implementing a Yggdrasil-style World Tree in my world, which would assume this job.



Are there any other ramifications as a result of not having an Astral Plane in a 5e campaign setting?







dnd-5e homebrew planes world-building astral






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 46 mins ago









KorvinStarmast

82.5k20257444




82.5k20257444










asked 3 hours ago









PixelMasterPixelMaster

12.1k346113




12.1k346113











  • $begingroup$
    initally, tier 1 or 2. However, the world will serve as a setting for all tiers, so the PC's level shouldn't really be relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    47 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just as an aside, the Astral Plane was a thing long before FR became a setting. It was in the AD&D 1e books a a thing. (Greyhawk default world if we view E Gygax as creator, and there were references to it in the OD&D supplements). Thus your reference to FR is irrelevant to the question. The astral plane touches most settings in one way or another. Suggest you edit your question to remove FR reference (it will make for a tighter/cleaner question). Also suggest you tighten your title: what are the mechanical effects of not having an Astral Plane in my setting. Up to you.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    40 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Title seems fine imho.
    $endgroup$
    – Quadratic Wizard
    32 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    initally, tier 1 or 2. However, the world will serve as a setting for all tiers, so the PC's level shouldn't really be relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    47 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just as an aside, the Astral Plane was a thing long before FR became a setting. It was in the AD&D 1e books a a thing. (Greyhawk default world if we view E Gygax as creator, and there were references to it in the OD&D supplements). Thus your reference to FR is irrelevant to the question. The astral plane touches most settings in one way or another. Suggest you edit your question to remove FR reference (it will make for a tighter/cleaner question). Also suggest you tighten your title: what are the mechanical effects of not having an Astral Plane in my setting. Up to you.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    40 mins ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Title seems fine imho.
    $endgroup$
    – Quadratic Wizard
    32 mins ago















$begingroup$
initally, tier 1 or 2. However, the world will serve as a setting for all tiers, so the PC's level shouldn't really be relevant.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
47 mins ago




$begingroup$
initally, tier 1 or 2. However, the world will serve as a setting for all tiers, so the PC's level shouldn't really be relevant.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
47 mins ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Just as an aside, the Astral Plane was a thing long before FR became a setting. It was in the AD&D 1e books a a thing. (Greyhawk default world if we view E Gygax as creator, and there were references to it in the OD&D supplements). Thus your reference to FR is irrelevant to the question. The astral plane touches most settings in one way or another. Suggest you edit your question to remove FR reference (it will make for a tighter/cleaner question). Also suggest you tighten your title: what are the mechanical effects of not having an Astral Plane in my setting. Up to you.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
40 mins ago





$begingroup$
Just as an aside, the Astral Plane was a thing long before FR became a setting. It was in the AD&D 1e books a a thing. (Greyhawk default world if we view E Gygax as creator, and there were references to it in the OD&D supplements). Thus your reference to FR is irrelevant to the question. The astral plane touches most settings in one way or another. Suggest you edit your question to remove FR reference (it will make for a tighter/cleaner question). Also suggest you tighten your title: what are the mechanical effects of not having an Astral Plane in my setting. Up to you.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
40 mins ago





1




1




$begingroup$
Title seems fine imho.
$endgroup$
– Quadratic Wizard
32 mins ago




$begingroup$
Title seems fine imho.
$endgroup$
– Quadratic Wizard
32 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Only the following elements in the core rulebooks use the Astral Plane



While it's impossible to list every possible Astral Plane interaction in D&D, the list of things in the three core rulebooks which rely on the Astral Plane is actually very limited.



The following spells, items or abilities allow travel to the Astral Plane, and will not have that function if the plane is removed:



  • An 18th-level monk's Timeless Body ability

  • A wild magic sorcerer's wild surge (2% chance)

  • The 9th level spell astral projection


  • Prismatic spray and prismatic wall's violet layer (can also banish to the Ethereal or another plane)

  • The Robe of Stars

  • A torn Bag of Devouring, Bag of Holding, Heward's Handy Haversack, or Portable Hole

  • Ether cyclones on the Ethereal Plane (5% chance)

The only other core rules elements which rely on that plane are as follows:



  • Souls of slain individuals traditionally travel to their final resting place via the Astral Plane. You need to invent a new reasoning for how souls get to their afterlife or the realm of their deity.

  • The Githyanki live on the Astral Plane. Without the Astral, they either don't exist or live somewhere else.


  • Forbiddance blocks planar travel, including from the Astral Plane; if you have no Astral Plane, it doesn't do that any more.

You don't need an Astral Plane



Fundamentally, you can completely ignore the Astral Plane. The only significant changes you need to make are explaining how souls and planar visitors get to the realms of the gods, explaining where stuff gets banished by certain spell effects that normally send things to the Astral, and resolving very high-level abilities that normally allow astral projection so that they work some other way.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Team win! comment gone. :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    34 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$

It's impossible to cover every scenario



You are trying to create a homebrew universe, which is awesome. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to cover all your bases but just deal with issues as they come up.



Building an entire universe is incredibly difficult, so don't worry about covering most cases (because you probably can't.) Worry more about building an engaging world and working on inconsistencies as they come up.



My own world and time management



I'm currently running a campaign in my own contained world that technically doesn't have those planes, either. I haven't even really considered the issues around that and I don't plan to unless something specific comes up. There is so much more to work on that creating contingencies for every possible thing is not a good use of my worldbuilding/storybuilding/encounterbuilding time.



It'll be a process



Authors can spend their lifetimes building and filling out their universe. As GMs, we often don't have that luxury - especially if our players are itching to get started.



What you need to do is fill in enough to get you started. Have your main story arc(s) outlined as well as your primary and motivating characters. But you're going to have to be flexible. Your players are going to change it, and you should let them and listen to them. Let them influence you and help build the world they are playing in. It'll likely lead to greater table satisfaction - and they're going to come up with ideas you probably wouldn't have :) And their actions can introduce new characters you hadn't thought of or new regions/worlds/planes interactions that you didn't consider.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate your advice, but I generally have a hard time with "just-roll-with-it-approaches". I don't know if it's because I tend to perfectionist or for some other reason, but I feel insecure and uncomfortable DMing a story without a decent, overarching theme/goal; in other words, when I start the campaign, I need to know the end goal / villain / etc. of the first "arc" (arc equals tiers of play here), and at least have a rough idea of possibilities for subsequent arcs. part 1/2 ...
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ... part 2/2: Since I'm also fond of the general concept of planes, the second act is likely to involve extraplanar entities. Since I'd like to at least hint towards the second arc during the first, I need / want to have the planes figured out. tl;dr I want my story neatly integrated with the world, and don't want to run into inconsistencies due to world elements not having been thought about for too long.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster That's kind of a different question - and I'm sure we can help with that as well. Unfortunately, I do think that what your'e getting at may be idea generation needs and better suited to a forum (or maybe to worldbuilding SE). FIguring out how to make your world work with your story is going to be very much opinion-based and idea generation.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster But you can try and present a problem of story vs plane/world and see if it's possible to answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't feel like I need to ask a question about that. I simply desire a solid foundation (in terms of world lore) to work with, but that's just me, it's not D&D-exclusive. Furthermore, I enjoy building a world, and I don't want to have to rush it later because the ongoing sessions demand it.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143972%2fwhat-are-the-ramifications-of-creating-a-homebrew-world-without-an-astral-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

Only the following elements in the core rulebooks use the Astral Plane



While it's impossible to list every possible Astral Plane interaction in D&D, the list of things in the three core rulebooks which rely on the Astral Plane is actually very limited.



The following spells, items or abilities allow travel to the Astral Plane, and will not have that function if the plane is removed:



  • An 18th-level monk's Timeless Body ability

  • A wild magic sorcerer's wild surge (2% chance)

  • The 9th level spell astral projection


  • Prismatic spray and prismatic wall's violet layer (can also banish to the Ethereal or another plane)

  • The Robe of Stars

  • A torn Bag of Devouring, Bag of Holding, Heward's Handy Haversack, or Portable Hole

  • Ether cyclones on the Ethereal Plane (5% chance)

The only other core rules elements which rely on that plane are as follows:



  • Souls of slain individuals traditionally travel to their final resting place via the Astral Plane. You need to invent a new reasoning for how souls get to their afterlife or the realm of their deity.

  • The Githyanki live on the Astral Plane. Without the Astral, they either don't exist or live somewhere else.


  • Forbiddance blocks planar travel, including from the Astral Plane; if you have no Astral Plane, it doesn't do that any more.

You don't need an Astral Plane



Fundamentally, you can completely ignore the Astral Plane. The only significant changes you need to make are explaining how souls and planar visitors get to the realms of the gods, explaining where stuff gets banished by certain spell effects that normally send things to the Astral, and resolving very high-level abilities that normally allow astral projection so that they work some other way.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Team win! comment gone. :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    34 mins ago















5












$begingroup$

Only the following elements in the core rulebooks use the Astral Plane



While it's impossible to list every possible Astral Plane interaction in D&D, the list of things in the three core rulebooks which rely on the Astral Plane is actually very limited.



The following spells, items or abilities allow travel to the Astral Plane, and will not have that function if the plane is removed:



  • An 18th-level monk's Timeless Body ability

  • A wild magic sorcerer's wild surge (2% chance)

  • The 9th level spell astral projection


  • Prismatic spray and prismatic wall's violet layer (can also banish to the Ethereal or another plane)

  • The Robe of Stars

  • A torn Bag of Devouring, Bag of Holding, Heward's Handy Haversack, or Portable Hole

  • Ether cyclones on the Ethereal Plane (5% chance)

The only other core rules elements which rely on that plane are as follows:



  • Souls of slain individuals traditionally travel to their final resting place via the Astral Plane. You need to invent a new reasoning for how souls get to their afterlife or the realm of their deity.

  • The Githyanki live on the Astral Plane. Without the Astral, they either don't exist or live somewhere else.


  • Forbiddance blocks planar travel, including from the Astral Plane; if you have no Astral Plane, it doesn't do that any more.

You don't need an Astral Plane



Fundamentally, you can completely ignore the Astral Plane. The only significant changes you need to make are explaining how souls and planar visitors get to the realms of the gods, explaining where stuff gets banished by certain spell effects that normally send things to the Astral, and resolving very high-level abilities that normally allow astral projection so that they work some other way.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Team win! comment gone. :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    34 mins ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$

Only the following elements in the core rulebooks use the Astral Plane



While it's impossible to list every possible Astral Plane interaction in D&D, the list of things in the three core rulebooks which rely on the Astral Plane is actually very limited.



The following spells, items or abilities allow travel to the Astral Plane, and will not have that function if the plane is removed:



  • An 18th-level monk's Timeless Body ability

  • A wild magic sorcerer's wild surge (2% chance)

  • The 9th level spell astral projection


  • Prismatic spray and prismatic wall's violet layer (can also banish to the Ethereal or another plane)

  • The Robe of Stars

  • A torn Bag of Devouring, Bag of Holding, Heward's Handy Haversack, or Portable Hole

  • Ether cyclones on the Ethereal Plane (5% chance)

The only other core rules elements which rely on that plane are as follows:



  • Souls of slain individuals traditionally travel to their final resting place via the Astral Plane. You need to invent a new reasoning for how souls get to their afterlife or the realm of their deity.

  • The Githyanki live on the Astral Plane. Without the Astral, they either don't exist or live somewhere else.


  • Forbiddance blocks planar travel, including from the Astral Plane; if you have no Astral Plane, it doesn't do that any more.

You don't need an Astral Plane



Fundamentally, you can completely ignore the Astral Plane. The only significant changes you need to make are explaining how souls and planar visitors get to the realms of the gods, explaining where stuff gets banished by certain spell effects that normally send things to the Astral, and resolving very high-level abilities that normally allow astral projection so that they work some other way.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Only the following elements in the core rulebooks use the Astral Plane



While it's impossible to list every possible Astral Plane interaction in D&D, the list of things in the three core rulebooks which rely on the Astral Plane is actually very limited.



The following spells, items or abilities allow travel to the Astral Plane, and will not have that function if the plane is removed:



  • An 18th-level monk's Timeless Body ability

  • A wild magic sorcerer's wild surge (2% chance)

  • The 9th level spell astral projection


  • Prismatic spray and prismatic wall's violet layer (can also banish to the Ethereal or another plane)

  • The Robe of Stars

  • A torn Bag of Devouring, Bag of Holding, Heward's Handy Haversack, or Portable Hole

  • Ether cyclones on the Ethereal Plane (5% chance)

The only other core rules elements which rely on that plane are as follows:



  • Souls of slain individuals traditionally travel to their final resting place via the Astral Plane. You need to invent a new reasoning for how souls get to their afterlife or the realm of their deity.

  • The Githyanki live on the Astral Plane. Without the Astral, they either don't exist or live somewhere else.


  • Forbiddance blocks planar travel, including from the Astral Plane; if you have no Astral Plane, it doesn't do that any more.

You don't need an Astral Plane



Fundamentally, you can completely ignore the Astral Plane. The only significant changes you need to make are explaining how souls and planar visitors get to the realms of the gods, explaining where stuff gets banished by certain spell effects that normally send things to the Astral, and resolving very high-level abilities that normally allow astral projection so that they work some other way.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 24 mins ago

























answered 44 mins ago









Quadratic WizardQuadratic Wizard

30.2k399163




30.2k399163











  • $begingroup$
    Team win! comment gone. :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    34 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Team win! comment gone. :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    34 mins ago















$begingroup$
Team win! comment gone. :)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
34 mins ago




$begingroup$
Team win! comment gone. :)
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
34 mins ago













3












$begingroup$

It's impossible to cover every scenario



You are trying to create a homebrew universe, which is awesome. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to cover all your bases but just deal with issues as they come up.



Building an entire universe is incredibly difficult, so don't worry about covering most cases (because you probably can't.) Worry more about building an engaging world and working on inconsistencies as they come up.



My own world and time management



I'm currently running a campaign in my own contained world that technically doesn't have those planes, either. I haven't even really considered the issues around that and I don't plan to unless something specific comes up. There is so much more to work on that creating contingencies for every possible thing is not a good use of my worldbuilding/storybuilding/encounterbuilding time.



It'll be a process



Authors can spend their lifetimes building and filling out their universe. As GMs, we often don't have that luxury - especially if our players are itching to get started.



What you need to do is fill in enough to get you started. Have your main story arc(s) outlined as well as your primary and motivating characters. But you're going to have to be flexible. Your players are going to change it, and you should let them and listen to them. Let them influence you and help build the world they are playing in. It'll likely lead to greater table satisfaction - and they're going to come up with ideas you probably wouldn't have :) And their actions can introduce new characters you hadn't thought of or new regions/worlds/planes interactions that you didn't consider.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate your advice, but I generally have a hard time with "just-roll-with-it-approaches". I don't know if it's because I tend to perfectionist or for some other reason, but I feel insecure and uncomfortable DMing a story without a decent, overarching theme/goal; in other words, when I start the campaign, I need to know the end goal / villain / etc. of the first "arc" (arc equals tiers of play here), and at least have a rough idea of possibilities for subsequent arcs. part 1/2 ...
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ... part 2/2: Since I'm also fond of the general concept of planes, the second act is likely to involve extraplanar entities. Since I'd like to at least hint towards the second arc during the first, I need / want to have the planes figured out. tl;dr I want my story neatly integrated with the world, and don't want to run into inconsistencies due to world elements not having been thought about for too long.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster That's kind of a different question - and I'm sure we can help with that as well. Unfortunately, I do think that what your'e getting at may be idea generation needs and better suited to a forum (or maybe to worldbuilding SE). FIguring out how to make your world work with your story is going to be very much opinion-based and idea generation.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster But you can try and present a problem of story vs plane/world and see if it's possible to answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't feel like I need to ask a question about that. I simply desire a solid foundation (in terms of world lore) to work with, but that's just me, it's not D&D-exclusive. Furthermore, I enjoy building a world, and I don't want to have to rush it later because the ongoing sessions demand it.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

It's impossible to cover every scenario



You are trying to create a homebrew universe, which is awesome. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to cover all your bases but just deal with issues as they come up.



Building an entire universe is incredibly difficult, so don't worry about covering most cases (because you probably can't.) Worry more about building an engaging world and working on inconsistencies as they come up.



My own world and time management



I'm currently running a campaign in my own contained world that technically doesn't have those planes, either. I haven't even really considered the issues around that and I don't plan to unless something specific comes up. There is so much more to work on that creating contingencies for every possible thing is not a good use of my worldbuilding/storybuilding/encounterbuilding time.



It'll be a process



Authors can spend their lifetimes building and filling out their universe. As GMs, we often don't have that luxury - especially if our players are itching to get started.



What you need to do is fill in enough to get you started. Have your main story arc(s) outlined as well as your primary and motivating characters. But you're going to have to be flexible. Your players are going to change it, and you should let them and listen to them. Let them influence you and help build the world they are playing in. It'll likely lead to greater table satisfaction - and they're going to come up with ideas you probably wouldn't have :) And their actions can introduce new characters you hadn't thought of or new regions/worlds/planes interactions that you didn't consider.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate your advice, but I generally have a hard time with "just-roll-with-it-approaches". I don't know if it's because I tend to perfectionist or for some other reason, but I feel insecure and uncomfortable DMing a story without a decent, overarching theme/goal; in other words, when I start the campaign, I need to know the end goal / villain / etc. of the first "arc" (arc equals tiers of play here), and at least have a rough idea of possibilities for subsequent arcs. part 1/2 ...
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ... part 2/2: Since I'm also fond of the general concept of planes, the second act is likely to involve extraplanar entities. Since I'd like to at least hint towards the second arc during the first, I need / want to have the planes figured out. tl;dr I want my story neatly integrated with the world, and don't want to run into inconsistencies due to world elements not having been thought about for too long.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster That's kind of a different question - and I'm sure we can help with that as well. Unfortunately, I do think that what your'e getting at may be idea generation needs and better suited to a forum (or maybe to worldbuilding SE). FIguring out how to make your world work with your story is going to be very much opinion-based and idea generation.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster But you can try and present a problem of story vs plane/world and see if it's possible to answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't feel like I need to ask a question about that. I simply desire a solid foundation (in terms of world lore) to work with, but that's just me, it's not D&D-exclusive. Furthermore, I enjoy building a world, and I don't want to have to rush it later because the ongoing sessions demand it.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

It's impossible to cover every scenario



You are trying to create a homebrew universe, which is awesome. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to cover all your bases but just deal with issues as they come up.



Building an entire universe is incredibly difficult, so don't worry about covering most cases (because you probably can't.) Worry more about building an engaging world and working on inconsistencies as they come up.



My own world and time management



I'm currently running a campaign in my own contained world that technically doesn't have those planes, either. I haven't even really considered the issues around that and I don't plan to unless something specific comes up. There is so much more to work on that creating contingencies for every possible thing is not a good use of my worldbuilding/storybuilding/encounterbuilding time.



It'll be a process



Authors can spend their lifetimes building and filling out their universe. As GMs, we often don't have that luxury - especially if our players are itching to get started.



What you need to do is fill in enough to get you started. Have your main story arc(s) outlined as well as your primary and motivating characters. But you're going to have to be flexible. Your players are going to change it, and you should let them and listen to them. Let them influence you and help build the world they are playing in. It'll likely lead to greater table satisfaction - and they're going to come up with ideas you probably wouldn't have :) And their actions can introduce new characters you hadn't thought of or new regions/worlds/planes interactions that you didn't consider.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It's impossible to cover every scenario



You are trying to create a homebrew universe, which is awesome. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to cover all your bases but just deal with issues as they come up.



Building an entire universe is incredibly difficult, so don't worry about covering most cases (because you probably can't.) Worry more about building an engaging world and working on inconsistencies as they come up.



My own world and time management



I'm currently running a campaign in my own contained world that technically doesn't have those planes, either. I haven't even really considered the issues around that and I don't plan to unless something specific comes up. There is so much more to work on that creating contingencies for every possible thing is not a good use of my worldbuilding/storybuilding/encounterbuilding time.



It'll be a process



Authors can spend their lifetimes building and filling out their universe. As GMs, we often don't have that luxury - especially if our players are itching to get started.



What you need to do is fill in enough to get you started. Have your main story arc(s) outlined as well as your primary and motivating characters. But you're going to have to be flexible. Your players are going to change it, and you should let them and listen to them. Let them influence you and help build the world they are playing in. It'll likely lead to greater table satisfaction - and they're going to come up with ideas you probably wouldn't have :) And their actions can introduce new characters you hadn't thought of or new regions/worlds/planes interactions that you didn't consider.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 44 mins ago









KorvinStarmast

82.5k20257444




82.5k20257444










answered 3 hours ago









NautArchNautArch

61.1k8219406




61.1k8219406











  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate your advice, but I generally have a hard time with "just-roll-with-it-approaches". I don't know if it's because I tend to perfectionist or for some other reason, but I feel insecure and uncomfortable DMing a story without a decent, overarching theme/goal; in other words, when I start the campaign, I need to know the end goal / villain / etc. of the first "arc" (arc equals tiers of play here), and at least have a rough idea of possibilities for subsequent arcs. part 1/2 ...
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ... part 2/2: Since I'm also fond of the general concept of planes, the second act is likely to involve extraplanar entities. Since I'd like to at least hint towards the second arc during the first, I need / want to have the planes figured out. tl;dr I want my story neatly integrated with the world, and don't want to run into inconsistencies due to world elements not having been thought about for too long.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster That's kind of a different question - and I'm sure we can help with that as well. Unfortunately, I do think that what your'e getting at may be idea generation needs and better suited to a forum (or maybe to worldbuilding SE). FIguring out how to make your world work with your story is going to be very much opinion-based and idea generation.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster But you can try and present a problem of story vs plane/world and see if it's possible to answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't feel like I need to ask a question about that. I simply desire a solid foundation (in terms of world lore) to work with, but that's just me, it's not D&D-exclusive. Furthermore, I enjoy building a world, and I don't want to have to rush it later because the ongoing sessions demand it.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I appreciate your advice, but I generally have a hard time with "just-roll-with-it-approaches". I don't know if it's because I tend to perfectionist or for some other reason, but I feel insecure and uncomfortable DMing a story without a decent, overarching theme/goal; in other words, when I start the campaign, I need to know the end goal / villain / etc. of the first "arc" (arc equals tiers of play here), and at least have a rough idea of possibilities for subsequent arcs. part 1/2 ...
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ... part 2/2: Since I'm also fond of the general concept of planes, the second act is likely to involve extraplanar entities. Since I'd like to at least hint towards the second arc during the first, I need / want to have the planes figured out. tl;dr I want my story neatly integrated with the world, and don't want to run into inconsistencies due to world elements not having been thought about for too long.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster That's kind of a different question - and I'm sure we can help with that as well. Unfortunately, I do think that what your'e getting at may be idea generation needs and better suited to a forum (or maybe to worldbuilding SE). FIguring out how to make your world work with your story is going to be very much opinion-based and idea generation.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PixelMaster But you can try and present a problem of story vs plane/world and see if it's possible to answer here.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't feel like I need to ask a question about that. I simply desire a solid foundation (in terms of world lore) to work with, but that's just me, it's not D&D-exclusive. Furthermore, I enjoy building a world, and I don't want to have to rush it later because the ongoing sessions demand it.
    $endgroup$
    – PixelMaster
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
I appreciate your advice, but I generally have a hard time with "just-roll-with-it-approaches". I don't know if it's because I tend to perfectionist or for some other reason, but I feel insecure and uncomfortable DMing a story without a decent, overarching theme/goal; in other words, when I start the campaign, I need to know the end goal / villain / etc. of the first "arc" (arc equals tiers of play here), and at least have a rough idea of possibilities for subsequent arcs. part 1/2 ...
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I appreciate your advice, but I generally have a hard time with "just-roll-with-it-approaches". I don't know if it's because I tend to perfectionist or for some other reason, but I feel insecure and uncomfortable DMing a story without a decent, overarching theme/goal; in other words, when I start the campaign, I need to know the end goal / villain / etc. of the first "arc" (arc equals tiers of play here), and at least have a rough idea of possibilities for subsequent arcs. part 1/2 ...
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
... part 2/2: Since I'm also fond of the general concept of planes, the second act is likely to involve extraplanar entities. Since I'd like to at least hint towards the second arc during the first, I need / want to have the planes figured out. tl;dr I want my story neatly integrated with the world, and don't want to run into inconsistencies due to world elements not having been thought about for too long.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
... part 2/2: Since I'm also fond of the general concept of planes, the second act is likely to involve extraplanar entities. Since I'd like to at least hint towards the second arc during the first, I need / want to have the planes figured out. tl;dr I want my story neatly integrated with the world, and don't want to run into inconsistencies due to world elements not having been thought about for too long.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
3 hours ago













$begingroup$
@PixelMaster That's kind of a different question - and I'm sure we can help with that as well. Unfortunately, I do think that what your'e getting at may be idea generation needs and better suited to a forum (or maybe to worldbuilding SE). FIguring out how to make your world work with your story is going to be very much opinion-based and idea generation.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
@PixelMaster That's kind of a different question - and I'm sure we can help with that as well. Unfortunately, I do think that what your'e getting at may be idea generation needs and better suited to a forum (or maybe to worldbuilding SE). FIguring out how to make your world work with your story is going to be very much opinion-based and idea generation.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago













$begingroup$
@PixelMaster But you can try and present a problem of story vs plane/world and see if it's possible to answer here.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@PixelMaster But you can try and present a problem of story vs plane/world and see if it's possible to answer here.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
I don't feel like I need to ask a question about that. I simply desire a solid foundation (in terms of world lore) to work with, but that's just me, it's not D&D-exclusive. Furthermore, I enjoy building a world, and I don't want to have to rush it later because the ongoing sessions demand it.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I don't feel like I need to ask a question about that. I simply desire a solid foundation (in terms of world lore) to work with, but that's just me, it's not D&D-exclusive. Furthermore, I enjoy building a world, and I don't want to have to rush it later because the ongoing sessions demand it.
$endgroup$
– PixelMaster
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143972%2fwhat-are-the-ramifications-of-creating-a-homebrew-world-without-an-astral-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

名間水力發電廠 目录 沿革 設施 鄰近設施 註釋 外部連結 导航菜单23°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.7113923°50′10″N 120°42′41″E / 23.83611°N 120.71139°E / 23.83611; 120.71139計畫概要原始内容臺灣第一座BOT 模式開發的水力發電廠-名間水力電廠名間水力發電廠 水利署首件BOT案原始内容《小檔案》名間電廠 首座BOT水力發電廠原始内容名間電廠BOT - 經濟部水利署中區水資源局

格濟夫卡 參考資料 导航菜单51°3′40″N 34°2′21″E / 51.06111°N 34.03917°E / 51.06111; 34.03917ГезівкаПогода в селі 编辑或修订