Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?Can't observe DC offset in a simple RC circuit with an oscilloscopeWhy I cannot see SPI signal properly with oscilloscope?Cannot get a digital square wave on oscilloscope from the GPIO of the Raspberry Pi?Can I see an analog signal with changeable frequency on oscilloscope?See if signal is amplified without an oscilloscopeMy “audio oscilloscope” can't measure static/constant voltages but only changesHow to add bouncing to a switch in LTspice?Is it bad to let an oscilloscope trace go off screen?Why do I see multiple waveforms on my oscilloscope in normal trigger mode?To see an encoded AM radio wave, what kind of Oscilloscope do I need?
Watching something be written to a file live with tail
Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
A case of the sniffles
Filter any system log file by date or date range
DC-DC converter from low voltage at high current, to high voltage at low current
Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?
Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?
Why can't we play rap on piano?
Codimension of non-flat locus
Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?
I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply
Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?
Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?
When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?
Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file
Roll the carpet
Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?
Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?
Why doesn't a class having private constructor prevent inheriting from this class? How to control which classes can inherit from a certain base?
Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?
Can't observe DC offset in a simple RC circuit with an oscilloscopeWhy I cannot see SPI signal properly with oscilloscope?Cannot get a digital square wave on oscilloscope from the GPIO of the Raspberry Pi?Can I see an analog signal with changeable frequency on oscilloscope?See if signal is amplified without an oscilloscopeMy “audio oscilloscope” can't measure static/constant voltages but only changesHow to add bouncing to a switch in LTspice?Is it bad to let an oscilloscope trace go off screen?Why do I see multiple waveforms on my oscilloscope in normal trigger mode?To see an encoded AM radio wave, what kind of Oscilloscope do I need?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm trying to view bouncing of a simple switch on the oscilloscope. I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of scope screen and circuit. Please help me to identify why I can't catch bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: I have added a 3rd photo showing zoomed in time scale, 50uSec. As you can see it is rising 0 to 9v within 150uSec and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. Resistor in the picture is 220ohm 0.5w resistor.
switches oscilloscope debounce
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
|
show 10 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm trying to view bouncing of a simple switch on the oscilloscope. I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of scope screen and circuit. Please help me to identify why I can't catch bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: I have added a 3rd photo showing zoomed in time scale, 50uSec. As you can see it is rising 0 to 9v within 150uSec and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. Resistor in the picture is 220ohm 0.5w resistor.
switches oscilloscope debounce
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, zoom in farther. Although, I must say that switches typically bounce for 1-10ms, and that should be visible on the OP's 50ms/div timescale. That's surprisingly clean switch.
$endgroup$
– Toor
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
58 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
22 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
14 mins ago
|
show 10 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm trying to view bouncing of a simple switch on the oscilloscope. I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of scope screen and circuit. Please help me to identify why I can't catch bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: I have added a 3rd photo showing zoomed in time scale, 50uSec. As you can see it is rising 0 to 9v within 150uSec and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. Resistor in the picture is 220ohm 0.5w resistor.
switches oscilloscope debounce
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I'm trying to view bouncing of a simple switch on the oscilloscope. I have prepared a simple breadboard circuit (power->switch->resistor->ground). The problem is, it is displayed as perfect square/rectangle on the scope. I have attached a photo of scope screen and circuit. Please help me to identify why I can't catch bouncing of the switch on the scope. I don't think it this is a non-bouncing switch.
Edit: I have added a 3rd photo showing zoomed in time scale, 50uSec. As you can see it is rising 0 to 9v within 150uSec and staying there. I have tried a few different switches. Resistor in the picture is 220ohm 0.5w resistor.
switches oscilloscope debounce
switches oscilloscope debounce
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 31 mins ago
Deniz
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
asked 1 hour ago
DenizDeniz
1113
1113
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
6
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, zoom in farther. Although, I must say that switches typically bounce for 1-10ms, and that should be visible on the OP's 50ms/div timescale. That's surprisingly clean switch.
$endgroup$
– Toor
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
58 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
22 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
14 mins ago
|
show 10 more comments
6
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, zoom in farther. Although, I must say that switches typically bounce for 1-10ms, and that should be visible on the OP's 50ms/div timescale. That's surprisingly clean switch.
$endgroup$
– Toor
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
58 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
22 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
14 mins ago
6
6
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, zoom in farther. Although, I must say that switches typically bounce for 1-10ms, and that should be visible on the OP's 50ms/div timescale. That's surprisingly clean switch.
$endgroup$
– Toor
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, zoom in farther. Although, I must say that switches typically bounce for 1-10ms, and that should be visible on the OP's 50ms/div timescale. That's surprisingly clean switch.
$endgroup$
– Toor
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
58 mins ago
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
58 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
22 mins ago
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
22 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
14 mins ago
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
14 mins ago
|
show 10 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
36 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430983%2fwhy-cant-i-see-bouncing-of-switch-on-oscilloscope-screen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
36 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
36 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
$endgroup$
First, "zoom in" to that rising edge by adjusting the time base. When you start getting close, you will start to see the rising slope of the signal.
As you do this, you will start to lose resolution on your captured signal. You can capture new samples of that rising edge using the scope's triggering mechanism.
Once you can see the rising slope, capture a new sample. Any bouncing/overshoot/noise should become apparent.
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
edited 4 mins ago
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
answered 59 mins ago
bitsmackbitsmack
11.9k73677
11.9k73677
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
36 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
36 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 mins ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
36 mins ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
36 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
If you zoom a stored waveform it may not have intermediate samples and just interpolate. You may see the edge sharper if you store a new sample at the higher timebase setting. As mentioned, good or new switches may have very little detectable bounce.
$endgroup$
– KalleMP
31 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Deniz no switch closure is going to result in a piecewise linear pulse -- that has to be a zoom-in of something sampled at a lower rate (probably 150$mu$s, because that's how long it's taking to rise up).
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
12 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
$endgroup$
Figure 1. The guys down at photo-forensics found this.
There are several factors:
- You have a nice new clean switch that bounces very little.
- Your scope is loading the circuit and the 15 pF is enough to help. This is unlikely, though, with what appears to be a resistor with a value in the hundreds of ohms. (The colour rendition of your photo is poor.)
- Timebase is too fast - but your comments say you've checked this.
I'd go with the first and second option.
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
answered 1 hour ago
TransistorTransistor
88.2k785189
88.2k785189
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 mins ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
I have added 50uSec zoomed time scale photo. As you can see no bounce. I will also try to read button with a micro controller to see whether it is actually bouncing or not.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 mins ago
$begingroup$
So you think the 15pF is loading the 220 Ohms with a 3.3ns RC asymptote resulting in a 150us linear ramp? Ask the forensic guys to check again. My forensic guy said it smelt like 220 ohm i.stack.imgur.com/xEwUo.png
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
9 mins ago
add a comment |
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430983%2fwhy-cant-i-see-bouncing-of-switch-on-oscilloscope-screen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
var $window = $(window),
onScroll = function(e)
var $elem = $('.new-login-left'),
docViewTop = $window.scrollTop(),
docViewBottom = docViewTop + $window.height(),
elemTop = $elem.offset().top,
elemBottom = elemTop + $elem.height();
if ((docViewTop elemBottom))
StackExchange.using('gps', function() StackExchange.gps.track('embedded_signup_form.view', location: 'question_page' ); );
$window.unbind('scroll', onScroll);
;
$window.on('scroll', onScroll);
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
$begingroup$
Have you tried adjusting the time base / horizontal scale?
$endgroup$
– NMF
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, zoom in farther. Although, I must say that switches typically bounce for 1-10ms, and that should be visible on the OP's 50ms/div timescale. That's surprisingly clean switch.
$endgroup$
– Toor
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
If you don't succeed on the first try, try again.
$endgroup$
– StainlessSteelRat
58 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
I have a hard time believing that your zoomed in version is actually a new trig. Nothing would look like that except the scope's internal interpolation. An clean break with an RC-filter created by the scope would show an exponential clean rise - nothing linear. I bet that you just zoomed in on the stored waveform.
$endgroup$
– pipe
22 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
My zoomed photo is from another capture with battery instead of power supply. But as @pipe sait I have captured on zoomed out view and then zoomed on the rising edge after that. Now I understand that changing time scale before the capture and after the capture is different things? I didn't know that. I will need to figure out how to capture when time scale is set to uSec range.
$endgroup$
– Deniz
14 mins ago